Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T08:11:32.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infrequent drinking, digestive efficiency and particle size of digesta in black Bedouin goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Brosh
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Israel
I. Choshniak
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Israel
A. Tadmor
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Israel
A. Shkolnik
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Summary

When given access to water once every 4 days, black Bedouin goats that were fed dry lucerne hay required, on average, only half the water and 60% of the gross energy they consumed when water was offered to them once daily. Digestibility of the feed in these goats was increased by 4%. The outflow of fluid from the rumen slowed down during the water deprivation period. A flow rate of 1080 ml/kg0.75. day was recorded during the 1st day of the period and only 350 ml/kg0.75. day during the last day. While being offered water once daily the outflow from the rumen amounted to 1243 ml/kg0.75.day.

Following the subjection of black Bedouin goats to infrequent drinking the mean retention time of the digesta in the rumen was extended by 33 % and in the entire gastrointestinal tract by 43 %. It is suggested that the slowing down of the ruminal flow that followed the subjection of the goats to infrequent drinking enabled the particulate matter to stay longer in the digestive tract despite their smaller size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, R. L., Koong, L. J. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1977). The formation and utilization of fermentation endproducts: mathematical models. In Microbial Ecology of the Gut (ed. Clarke, R. T. J. and Bauchop, T.), pp. 347391. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1956). The nutritive value of feeds as sources of energy. A review. Journal of Dairy Science 39, 1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Brosh, A., Shkolnik, A. & Choshniak, I. (1986). Metabolic effects of infrequent drinking and low-quality feed on Bedouin goats. Ecology (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. & Quin, J. L. (1949). Studies on the water requirement of farm animals in South Africa. 1. Effect of intermittent watering on merino-sheep. Onder-steeport Journal of Veterinary Sciences 22, 335356.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The use of markers for partition digestion within gastro intestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 277291. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
French, M. H. (1956). The effect of infrequent water intake on the consumption and digestibility of hay by Zebu. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 24 (94), 128136.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hydén, S. (1961). Determination of the amount of fluid in the reticulo-rumen of sheep and its rate of passage to the omasum. Kungl. Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler 27, 5179.Google Scholar
Larsen, C., Hungerford, E. H. & Bailey, D. E. (1917). The rate of water in dairy cows ration. Dakota Agricultural Experimental Station 175, 648693.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, W. V., Morris, R. J. H., Howard, B., McDonald, J. & Budtz Olsen, O. E. (1961). Water and electrolyte changes in tropical merino sheep exposed to dehydration during summer. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 889912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
More, T. & Sahni, K. L. (1981). Effects of water intake on feed digestibility. World Review of Animal Production 17(2), 3339.Google Scholar
Reid, C. S. W., Ulyatt, M. J. & Monro, J. A. (1977). The physical breakdown of feed during digestion in rumen. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 37, 173175.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1956). Animals and arid conditions. Physiological aspects of productive and management in the future of arid lands. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., pp. 368382.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1964). Desert Animals: Physiological Problems of Heat and Water. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shkolnik, A. & Choshniak, I. (1984). Physiological response and productivity of goats. In CRC Stress Physiology in Livestock vol. 2, Ungulates (ed. Yousef, M. K.), pp. 3955. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Squires, V. R. (1973). Distance to water as factor in performance of livestock on arid and semi-arid range-lands. Proceedings of Water–Animal Relation Symposium (ed. Maryland, H. F.), pp. 2833. Soil Scientists USDA-ARS-Western Region, Snake River Conservation Research Center, Kimberley, Idaho.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. F. & Yates, N. G. (1968). Some effects of water restricted on apparent digestibility and water excretion of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 65672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, P., Colucci, P. E. & Van Soest, P. J. (1980). Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta; rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, A. C. I. & Stacy, B. D. (1968). The fate of water in the rumen. 1. A critical appraisal of the use of soluble markers. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 369388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. D. (1970). Water economy and food intake of sheep when watered intermittently. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 273281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar