Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Isolating the ‘farmer’ effect as a component of the advantage of growing genetically modified varieties in developing countries: a Bt cotton case study from Jalgaon, India

  • S. MORSE (a1), R. BENNETT (a2) and Y. ISMAEL (a1)
Summary

The present paper explores the ‘farmer’ effect in economic advantages often claimed for Bt cotton varieties (those with the endotoxin gene from Bacillus thuringiensis conferring resistance to some insect pests) compared to non-Bt varieties. Critics claim that much of the yield advantage of Bt cotton could be due to the fact that farmers adopting the technology are in a better position to provide inputs and management and so much of any claimed Bt advantage is an artefact rather than reflecting a real advantage of the variety per se. The present paper provides an in-depth analysis of 63 non-adopting and 94 adopting households of Bt cotton in Jalgaon, Maharashtra State, India, spanning the seasons 2002 and 2003. Results suggest that Bt adopters are indeed different from non-adopters in a number of ways. Adopters appear to specialize more on cotton (at least in terms of the land area they devote to the crop), spend more money on irrigation and grow well-performing non-Bt varieties of cotton (Bunny). Taking gross margin as the basis for comparison, Bt plots had 2·5 times the gross margin of non-Bt plots in both seasons. If only adopters are considered then the gross margin advantage of Bt plots reduces to 1·6 times that of non-Bt plots. This is still a significant advantage and could well explain the popularity of Bt in Maharashtra. However, it is clear that great care needs to be taken with such comparative studies.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: s.morse@reading.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Arends-Kuenning, M. & Makundi, F. (2000). Agricultural biotechnology for developing countries – prospects and policies. American Behavioral Scientist 44, 318349.
Barwale, R. B., Gadwal, V. R., Zehr, U. & Zehr, B. (2004). Prospects for Bt cotton technology in India. AgBioForum 7, 2326.
Bennett, R. M., Ismael, Y., Kambhampati, U. & Morse, S. (2004). Economic impact of genetically-modified cotton in India. AgBioForum 7, 96100.
Bennett, R., Kambhampati, U., Morse, S. & Ismael, Y. (2006). Farm-level economic performance of genetically modified cotton in Maharashtra, India. Review of Agricultural Economics 28, 5971.
Crost, B., Shankar, B., Bennett, R. & Morse, S. (2007). Bias from farmer self-selection in GM crop productivity estimates: evidence from Indian data. Journal of Agricultural Economics 58, 2436.
deGrassi, A. (2003). Genetically Modified Crops and Sustainable Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Assessment of Current Evidence. Accra, Ghana, Africa: Third World Network.
Delmer, D. P. (2005). Agriculture in the developing world: connecting innovations in plant research to downstream applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 1573915746.
Gala, R. (2005). India's Bt Cotton Fraud. London: Institute of Science in Society. Press Release dated 03/05/05 available online at http://www.i-sis.org.uk/IBTCF.php (verified 14/3/07).
GMWatch (2005). More on Study Confirming Failure of Bt Cotton. Norwich, UK: Norfolk Genetic Information Network.
Gonzalez-Cabrera, J., Escriche, B., Tabashnik, B. E. & Ferre, J. (2003). Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in resistant and susceptible strains of pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 33, 929935.
Hillocks, R. J. (2005). Is there a role for Bt cotton in IPM for smallholders in Africa? International Journal of Pest Management 51, 131141.
Hossain, F., Pray, C. E., Lu, Y. M., Huang, J. K. & Fan, C. H. (2004). Genetically modified cotton and farmers' health in China. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 10, 296303.
James, C. (2002). Global Review of Commercialised Transgenic Crops Featuring Bt Cotton. ISAA Brief No. 26. Ithaca, NY: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications.
Jayaraman, K. S. (2005). Indian Bt gene monoculture, potential timebomb. Nature Biotechnology 23, 158.
Kambhampati, U., Morse, S., Bennett, R. & Ismael, Y. (2006). Farm-level performance of genetically-modified cotton: a frontier analysis of cotton production in Maharashtra. Outlook on Agriculture 35, 291297.
Kranthi, K. R. & Kranthi, N. R. (2004). Modelling adaptability of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to Bt cotton in India. Current Science 87, 10961107.
Morse, S., Bennett, R. M. & Ismael, Y. (2005). Genetically modified insect resistance in cotton: some farm level economic impacts in India. Crop Protection 24, 433440.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2003). The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Available online at http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/browseablepublications/gmcropsdevcountries/report_212.html (verified 14/3/07).
Orton, L. (2003). GM Crops – Going Against the Grain. London: ActionAid. Available online at http://www.actionaid.org.uk/doc_lib/against_the_grain.pdf (verified 14/3/07).
Pemsl, D., Waibel, H. & Orphal, J. (2004). A methodology to assess the profitability of Bt cotton: case study results from the state of Karnataka, India. Crop Protection 23, 12491257.
Qaim, M. (2003). Bt cotton in India: field trial results and economic projections. World Development 31, 21152127.
Qaim, M. & Zilberman, D. (2003). Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299, 900902.
Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Naik, G. & Zilberman, D. (2006). Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India. Review of Agricultural Economics 28, 4858.
Russell, D. & Deguine, J. P. (2006). Sustainability of Bt cotton in China and India. Cahiers Agricultures 15, 5459.
Tabashnik, B. E., Patin, A. L., Dennehy, T. J., Liu, Y. B., Carriere, Y., Sims, M. A. & Antilla, L. (2000). Frequency of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in field populations of pink bollworm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 1298012984.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed