Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T21:37:15.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A methodology for the analysis of the relationships between farms and their physical environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

J. A. RIVEIRO ,
M. F. MAREY-PÉREZ ,
E. R. DÍAZ-VARELA  and
C. J. ÁLVAREZ
J. A. RIVEIRO
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela – Agroforestry Engineering, Campus Universitario s/n Lugo27002, Spain
M. F. MAREY-PÉREZ
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela – Agroforestry Engineering, Campus Universitario s/n Lugo27002, Spain
E. R. DÍAZ-VARELA
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela – Agroforestry Engineering, Campus Universitario s/n Lugo27002, Spain
C. J. ÁLVAREZ*
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela – Agroforestry Engineering, Campus Universitario s/n Lugo27002, Spain
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: carlosjose.alvarez@usc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Agricultural activity involves direct interaction with the physical environment factors in the environmental context in which the activity is developed. Galicia, northwest Spain, is an environmentally heterogeneous region that encompasses territorial spaces with different levels of suitability for each agricultural activity. In barely 30 years, the production systems of the region have evolved from self-sufficiency to commercial production; however, the requirements of production for each differ greatly. During such a transformation, many farms have disappeared while other farms have conformed to the requirements of the current production systems without changing location. Decision-making in rural planning requires knowing the spatial distribution of farms, the evolution of farm distribution and the relationship between the spatial location of farms (associated with some specific environmental characteristics) and the production systems used.

The current paper describes a methodology for analysing the spatial distribution of farms and for determining the relationships between the spatial location of farms and the values of the physical environment factors that are characteristic of each spatial location. The methodology has been developed by using Agricultural Census data and is exemplified through the analysis of two crops (wheat and potato) and one farming activity (dairy farming). Results show the location of farms and the production systems used, and reveal different degrees of fit to the physical environment factors considered.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 148 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 101 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Africor Lugo (2007). Memoria de Actividades da Asociación Provincial de Criadores de Frisón de Lugo para o Control de Rendementos. Available online at http://www.africorlugo.com/memorias.asp (verified 16 July 2009).Google Scholar
Andersen, E., Elbersen, B., Godeschalkc, F. & Verhoog, D. (2007). Farm management indicators and farm typologies as a basis for assessments in a changing policy environment. Journal of Environmental Management 82, 353–362.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. J. & Galwey, N. W. (2002). The use of spatial analysis to measure the effect of environmental heterogeneity on genetic variation in Trifolium species from Sardinia. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 139, 283–294.Google Scholar
Bouhier, A. (2001). Galicia. Ensaio Xeográfico de Análise e Interpretación dun Vello Complexo Agrario. Tomos I y II (Translated by B. Casal Vila). Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Xunta de Galicia – Consellería de Agricultura, Gandería e Montes. Caixanova.Google Scholar
Brasier, K. J. (2005). Spatial analysis of changes in the number of farms during the farm crisis. Rural Sociology 70, 540–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffontaines, J. P., Thenail, C. & Baudry, J. (1995). Agricultural systems and landscape patterns – how can we build a relationship? Landscape and Urban Planning 31, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Miguel, J. C., Perez, T. & Rodríguez, X. A. (2002). Tendencias productivas en las explotaciones de leche gallegas. Revista Galega de Economía 12, 1–18.Google Scholar
Dendoncker, N., Rounsevell, M. & Bogaert, P. (2007). Spatial analysis and modelling of land use distributions in Belgium. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 31, 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EIDO-USC (2004). Estudios Comarcales De Ordenación Productiva Agraria De 21 Comarcas. Santiago De Compostela, Spain: Xunta De Galicia – Consellería De Política Agroalimentaria e Desarrollo Rural.Google Scholar
Hodson, D. P. & White, J. W. (2007). Use of spatial analyses for global characterization of wheat-based production systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 115–125.Google Scholar
IGE (2006) Galicia en Cifras. Available online at http://www.ige.eu/estatico/html/gl/galicia_en_cifras/galicia_2006/gcifras_2006_c07.pdf (verified 16 July 2009).Google Scholar
INE (1962). Censo Agrario de 1962. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.Google Scholar
INE (1989) Base de microdatos del Censo Agrario de 1989. Available online at http://www.ine.es/prodyser/micro_censoag.htm (verified 16 July 2009).Google Scholar
INE (1999) Base de microdatos del Censo Agrario de 1999. Available online at http://www.ine.es/prodyser/micro_censoag.htm (verified 16 July 2009).Google Scholar
INE-EEEA (2003) Encuesta sobre la Estructura de las Explotaciones Agrícolas de 2003. Available online at http://www.ine.es/proyectos/exploagri/proy_explo_agri.pdf (verified 19 July 2009).Google Scholar
INE-EPA (2003) Encuesta de Población Activa. Año 2003. Available online at http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t22/e308_mnu&file=inebase&N=&L=0 (verified 16 July 2009).Google Scholar
Jongman, R. H. G. (2002). Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape and Urban Planning 58, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1956). Foundations of the Theory of Probability, 2nd edn.New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kristensen, L. S., Thenail, C. & Kristensen, S. P. (2004). Landscape changes in agrarian landscapes in the 1990s: the interaction between farmers and the farmed landscape. A case study from Jutland, Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 231–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López Iglesias, E. (2000). O sector agrário galego ás portas do século XXI: balance das suas transformacións recentes. Revista Galega de Economía 9, 167–196.Google Scholar
MAPA (2004). Sistema de Información Geográfica de Datos Agrarios (SIGA). Available online at http://www.mapa.es/es/sig/pags/siga/intro.htm (verified 16 July 2009).Google Scholar
Mignolet, C., Schott, C. & Benoît, M. (2004). Spatial dynamics of agricultural practices on a basin territory: a retrospective study to implement models simulating nitrate flow. The case of the Seine basin. Agronomie 24, 219–236.Google Scholar
Mignolet, C., Schott, C. & Benoît, M. (2007). Spatial dynamics of farming practices in the Seine basin: Methods for agronomic approaches on a regional scale. Science of the Total Environment 375, 13–32.Google Scholar
Riveiro, J. A. (2007). La tipificación y clasificación de explotaciones como una herramienta para diferenciar los distintos sistemas productivos – Aplicación a las explotaciones de vacuno lechero en Galicia. PhD thesis, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain.Google Scholar
Riveiro, J. A., Marey, M. F., Marco, J. L. & Álvarez, C. J. (2008). Procedure for the classification and characterization of farms for agricultural production planning: application in the Northwest of Spain. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 61, 169–178.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Couso, M., Teijido, M., Álvarez, C. J. (2006). Rural development in Galicia (north-west Spain). Outlook on Agriculture 35, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roschewitz, I., Thies, C. & Tscharntke, T. (2004). Are landscape complexity and farm specialisation related to land-use intensity of annual crop fields? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmit, C. & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2006). Are agricultural land use patterns influenced by farmer imitation? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 115, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sineiro, F. (2006). A evolución socioeconómica dos sectores rurais galegos. Recursos Rurais – Serie Cursos 4, 47–55.Google Scholar
Skop, E. & Schou, J. S. (1999). Modeling the effects of agricultural production. An integrated economic and environmental analysis using farm account statistics and GIS. Ecological Economics, 29, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods. 8th edn.Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Thenail, C. (2002). Relationships between farm characteristics and the variation of the density of hedgerows at the level of a micro-region of bocage landscape. Study case in Brittany, France. Agricultural Systems 71, 207–230.Google Scholar
Thenail, C. & Baudry, J. (2004). Variation of farm spatial land use pattern according to the structure of the hedgerow network (bocage) landscape: a case study in northeast Brittany. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 101, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vence, X. (2000). Cambio estrutural e innovación na economía galega. Os retos na soleira do século XXI. Revista Galega de Economía 9, 43–88.Google Scholar
Winkler Stirm, J. E. & St-Pierre, N. R. (2003). Identification and characterization of location decision factors for relocating dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3473–3487.Google Scholar
Xunta de Galicia. (2007) Consellería de Medio rural. Available online at http://mediorural.xunta.es/nc/areas/infraestruturas/concentracions_parcelarias/buscador/ (verified 16 July 2009).Google Scholar
Zhu, J. & Morgan, G. D. (2004). Comparison of spatial variables over subregions using a block bootstrap. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 9, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar