Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T09:09:09.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modification of the analytical procedures for the determination of herbage and faecal n-alkanes used in the estimation of herbage intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. A. Vulich ,
J. P. Hanrahan  and
B. A. Crowley
S. A. Vulich
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Belclare, Tuam, Co Galway, Republic of Ireland
J. P. Hanrahan
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Belclare, Tuam, Co Galway, Republic of Ireland
B. A. Crowley
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Belclare, Tuam, Co Galway, Republic of Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The evaluation of n-alkane concentrations in herbage and faeces is the basis of a methodology that yields precise estimates of herbage intake. Established chemical analysis procedures for the determination of n-alkane concentrations in herbage and faecal samples involve an elaborate sequence of steps utilizing n-hexane as solvent for both the liquid-liquid extraction of n-alkanes from the sample and the solid-phase separation of n-alkanes in the extract. Composites of herbage and faecal samples from studies with sheep provided the experimental material used to evaluate a series of modifications which would simplify and reduce the workload involved in the chemical analysis. The results show that a less hazardous chemical, n-heptane, can replace n-hexane at all stages of the analytical procedure. They also show that evaporation of the sample extract and redissolving it prior to the separation of the n-alkanes, using a silica gel column, is unnecessary and that the volume of solvent used can be reduced. Procedures for saponification of samples prior to extraction can also be simplified as the process can be run overnight involving a slow build-up of temperature to 90 °C. The gain in precision from processing samples in duplicate was negligible and it would be more appropriate to invest extra efforts on an increased number of experimental animals. The results snowed that the workload and cost of using the n-alkane technique to estimate herbage intake can be reduced substantially.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 124 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 71 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. & Colgrove, P. M. (1986). The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patty, F. A. (1963). Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 2nd Edn, Vol 2. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A. (1990). Preparation of capsules for the dosing of n-alkanes used to estimate feed intake in sheep. In Animal Production Research Report 1988–89, pp. 196–197. Dublin: Teagase.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1990). Determination of herbage and faecal n-alkane contents: sources of sampling variation. In Proceedings of the VIIth European Grazing Workshop, Wageningen, The Netherlands (Ed. Agricultural University, Department of Field Crops and Grassland Science, Wageningen), Paper TH 4.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., Hanrahan, J. P. & O'Riordan, E. G. (1990). Variation of intake at pasture: differences among breeds of sheep of different mature size. In Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Edinburgh (Eds Hill, W. G., Thompson, R. & Woolliams, J. A.), Vol. 15, 57–60.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O'Riordan, E. G. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1991 a). Use of n-alkanes for the estimation of herbage intake in sheep: accuracy and precision of the estimates. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116, 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O'Riordan, E. G. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1991 b). Effect of litter size on herbage intake at pasture by ewes and their progeny. Animal Production 53, 191–197.Google Scholar