Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-fz5kh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T09:51:55.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Net assimilation rate in barley, oats and wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Q. Cannell
R. Q. Cannell
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Net assimilation rate (E) was measured in three experiments involving related species and cultivated varieties with increasing grain yield potential in the genera Hordeum, Avena and Triticum. No consistent differences in E between the barley varieties were found, but in the oat and wheat experiments, Abundance and Atle respectively had lower values of E. However, these differences did not suggest that E had been influenced in selecting for grain yield. The relationship of E to dry-matter production was calculated and discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 157 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Davidson, J. L. (1965). Some effects of leaf area control on the yield of wheat. Aust. J. agric. Res. 16, 721–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, C. S. (1962). The importance of variety testing in relation to crop production. J. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. 9, 199–206.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G. (1964). Physiological studies, cereals section. Ann. Rep. 1962–3, Pl. Breed. Inst. Cambridge, p. 59.Google Scholar
Kidd, F. & West, C. (1918). Physiological pre-determination: the influence of the physiological conditions of the seed upon the course of subsequent growth and upon the yield. II. Review of literature, chapter I. Ann. appl. Biol. 5, 112–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1966). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H. (1961). Varietal differences in some physiological characters of wheat. Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 557–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murata, Y. (1961). Studies on the photosynthesis of rice plants and its culture significance. Bui. Natn. Instr. Agric. Aci. (Series D; No. 2, Nishinghara, Tokyo.) (Seen in Muramoto el al (1965).)Google Scholar
Muramoto, H., Hesketh, J. & El-Sharkawy, M. (1965). Relationships among rate of leaf area development, photosynthetic rate, and rate of dry-matter production among American cottons and other species. Crop Sci. 5, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
N.I.A.B. (1957). Varieties of spring wheats and spring barleys. Fmr's Leafl. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. no. 2.Google Scholar
N.I.A.B. (1961a). Varieties of oats. Fmrs' Leafl. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. no. 13.Google Scholar
N.I.A.B. (1961b). Varieties of spring wheats. Fmrs' Leafl. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. no. 9.Google Scholar
N.I.A.B. (1963). Varieties of barley. Fmrs’ Leafl. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. no. 10.Google Scholar
Quinlan, J. D. & Sagar, G. R. (1965). Grain yield in two contrasting varieties of spring wheat. Ann. Bot., N.S. 29, 683–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 484 p. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stoy, V. (1963). Some plant physiological aspects of the breeding of high yielding varieties. Recent Plant Breeding Research pp. 264–75. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1963). Varietal differences in photosynthesis of ears and leaves of barley. Ann. Bot., N.S. 27, 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thuorston, J. M. (1959). A comparative study of the growth of wild oats (A.fatua L. and A. ludoviciana D.) and of cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Ann. appl. Biol. 47, 716–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1947). Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties and within and between years. Ann. Bot., N.S. 11, 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1952). The physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv. Agron. 4, 101—45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1958). Physiological causes of differences in grain yield between varieties of barley. Ann. Bot., N.S. 22, 321–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1963). Analysis of growth and yield of winter and spring wheats. Ann. Bot. N.S. 27, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar