Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T08:17:44.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional studies with sheep fed conserved ryegrass. 1. Silage and dried grass offered ad libitum without supplements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. G. Wernli  and
R. J. Wilkins
C. G. Wernli
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
R. J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Silage, dried-grass wafers and dried-grass pellets all prepared from a single crop of perennial ryegrass were given ad libitum as sole diets to six rumen-fistulated wether sheep.

Feed intake, intake of digestible nutrients and the concentration of volatile fatty acids (VTA) in the rumen were lowest with silage, highest with pellets and intermediate with wafers. Conversely, digestibility, eating and ruminating time per kg D.M. consumed, rumen pH, the rate of D.M. and cellulose digestion in the rumen and the mean retention time of digesta in the alimentary tract were highest for silage, intermediate for wafers and lowest for pellets. The pattern of rumen fermentation differed significantly between silage and the dried-grass treatments. The rumen fluid contained higher proportions of acetic, iso-butyric, n-valeric and iso-valeric acids, but lower proportions of propionic and n-butyric acids with silage than with dried grass. Differences in rumen. VFA between the two forms of dried grass were small. Nitrogen retention was lowest for the silage treatment and this was associated with a high concentration of ammonia in the rumen.

Low nitrogen status with silage could have limited voluntary intake, whereas the difference in intake between the wafer and pellet treatments probably arose from differences in the retention time of digesta in the alimentary tract.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 209 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Agricultural Engineers (1967). Recommendation A.S.A.E. 2461. Method of determining modulus of uniformity and modulus of fineness of ground feeds. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Yearbook, 1967, p. 301.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 10th ed.Washington: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Baile, C. A., Mayer, J. & McLaughlin, C. (1969). Feeding behaviour of goats: ruminal distension, ingesta dilution and acetate concentration. American Journal of Physiology 217, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. Rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1971). Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of the extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristic of roughage. British Journal of Nutrition 26, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Johnson, V. W. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 2. Factors influencing the rate of breakdown of cellulose (cotton thread) in the rumen of the cow. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1976). Effects of intraperitoneal injections of DL-methionine on the voluntary intake and wool growth of sheep fed sole diets of hay, silage and pasture differing in digestibility. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Cook, J. E. & Wilkins, R. J. (1978). The influence of formic acid and formaldehyde additives and type of harvesting machine on the utilization of nitrogen in lucerne silages. 1. The voluntary intake and nitrogen retention of young sheep consuming the silages with and without intraperitoneal supplements of DL-methionine. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 701–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Fennessy, P. F. & Duncan, S. J. (1973). Effect of formaldehyde treatment on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage. III. Voluntary intake, liveweight gain and wool growth in sheep fed the silages with and without intraperitoneal supplementation with DL-methionine. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson and Co.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C. (1966). The control of voluntary intake of food in cattle. Outlook on Agriculture 5, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, B. C. & Milne, J. A. (1972). The nutritive value of processed roughages for milking cattle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1972, pp. 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciszuk, P. & Eriksson, S. (1973). Ammonia formation in the rumen of sheep fed on grass, clover and/or lucerne preserved in various ways. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 3, 13–20.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. Journal of Nutrition 15, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C. & Jarrige, R. (1970). The effect of method of forage conservation on digestibility and voluntary intake. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Grassland Congress, Surfers Paradise, pp. 733–737.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Moir, R. J. (1965). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. 1. Effects of duodenally infused single doses of casein, urea and propionate upon voluntary intake of a low-protein roughage by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. & Gibson, Q. H. (1954). The estimation of lactio acid using cerio sulphate. Biochemical Journal 58, 741–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhan, S. M. A. & Thomas, P. C. (1978). The effect of partial neutralisation of formic acid silages with sodium bicarbonate on their voluntary intake by cattle and sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 33, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. & Williams, A. J. (1962). The effects of pregnancy on the passage of food through the digestive tract of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 894–900.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Wainman, F. W. (1972). The nutritive value of processed roughage for fattening cattle and sheep. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1972, pp. 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedorn, H. C. & Jensen, B. N. (1923). Zur Mikrobestimmung des Blutzuckers mittels Ferricyanid. Biochemische Zeitschrift 135, 46–58.Google Scholar
Harris, C. E. & Raymond, W. F. (1963). The effect of ensiling on crop digestibility. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaney, D. P., Pigden, W. J. & Pritchard, G. I. (1966). The effect of freezing or drying pasture herbage on digestibility and voluntary intake assays with sheep. Proceedings of the Tenth International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 379–384.Google Scholar
Heaney, D. P., Pritchard, G. I. & Pigden, W. J. (1968). Variability in ad libitum forage intakes by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 27, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, K. J., Wilkins, R. J. & Osbourn, D. F. (1971). The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. III. The effects of post-ruminal infusions of casein on the intake and nitrogen retention of sheep given silage ad libitum. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 545–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, R. J. (1976). Effect of formaldehydetreated casein and methionine on the intake of silage by sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 36, 127.Google Scholar
Lawlor, M. J. & O'Shea, J. (1967). A comparison of rumen characteristics of hay versus silage-fed animals. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 119–121.Google Scholar
McLeod, D. S., Wilkins, R. J. & Raymond, W. F. (1970). The voluntary intake by sheep and cattle of silage differing in free-acid content. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, L. A., Thomas, J. W. & Sykes, J. F. (1960). The acceptability of grass/legume silage by dairy cattle. Proceedings of the Eighth International Grassland Congress, Reading, pp. 701–704.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. (1964). Some factors affecting the intake of roughage by sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1969). The nutritive value of forage crops. Advances in Agronomy 21, 2–108.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. & Flatt, W. P. (1975). The Evaluation of Feeds Through Digestibility Experiments. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Terry, R. A. & Tilley, J. M. A. (1962). Volatile fatty acid determinations on sheep rumen liquor. Experiments in Progress, Grassland Research Institute, No. 14, p. 58.Google Scholar
Tetlow, R. M. (1974). A method for determining particle size distribution in packages of dried forage. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 19, 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. W., Ingalls, J. B., Yang, M. & Reddy, B. S. (1961). Effect of ad libitum or equalized feeding of alfalfa hay or silage on rumen contents and its characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1203.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. W., Moore, L. A., Okamoto, M. & Sykes, J. F. (1961). A study of factors affecting the rate of intake of heifers fed silage. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1471–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Miller, R. W., Okamoto, M. & Moore, L. A. (1965 a). Ruminant utilization of silage in relation to hay, pellets and hay plus grain. II. Rumen content, dry matter passage and water intake. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1473–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Miller, R. W., Okamoto, M. & Moore, L. A. (1965 b). Ruminant utilization of silage in relation to hay, pellets and hay plus grain. I. Composition, digestion, nitrogen balance, intake and growth. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 910–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldo, D. B., Smith, L. W., Miller, B. W. & Moore, L. A. (1969). Growth, intake and digestibility from formic acid silage versus hay. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. & Stacey, B. D. (1968). The fate of water in the rumen. 1. A critical appraisal of the use of soluble markers. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1973). The effects of processing on the nutritive value of dehydrated forages. Proceedings of the First International Green Crop Drying Congress, Oxford, pp. 119–134.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1974). The effects of partial neutralization with sodium bicarbonate or ammonia and the feeding of blood meal on the voluntary intako of a whole-crop barley silage by sheep. Animal Production 19, 87–91.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1972). An evaluation of laboratory ensiling techniques. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 23, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelter, S. Z. & Charlet-Lery, G. (1969). Forme de presentation de l'aliment energetique (orge immature) et taux de retention de n-ureique chez le taurillon en croissance. Comptes rendu de I'Academie des Sciences, Paris 269, 1007–1010.Google Scholar