Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T21:13:25.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritive value of Lucerne: IV. The Leaf-Stem Ratio.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Woodman  and
R. E. Evans
H. E. Woodman
Affiliation:
(The Animal Nutrition Research Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.)
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
(The Animal Nutrition Research Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper are brought together a number of data concerning the ratio of the amount of leaf to stem in the lucerne crop, at different stages of growth, and the separate composition of the leafy and stemmy fractions.

It is shown that the proportion of leaf falls off as the crop advances in maturity, and that the rate of decrease of leafiness is greater before budding than during the period from the beginning of budding to early flower. The changes in the leaf-stem ratio largely account for the fall in protein content, the rise in fibre content and the running-off in digestibility and feeding value that take place as the crop passes through the successive stages of growth up to flowering.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 1935 , pp. 578 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

(1), Woodman, , Evans and , Norman. J. agric. Sci. (1933), 23, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2), Woodman, , Evans and , Norman. J. agric. Sci. (1934), 24, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3), Woodman and , Eden. J. agric. Sci. (1935), 25, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4), Nicol. Emp. J. exp. Agric. (1934), 2, 380.Google Scholar
(5), Salmon, , Swanson and , McCampbell. Tech. Bull. 15, Kans. agric. Exp. Sta.(1925), No. 15.Google Scholar
(6), Willard. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1930), 22, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar