Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-03T02:26:17.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of Panicum maximum (Guinea grass) II. Digestibility by cattle and water buffaloes, related to season and herbage growth stage*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. L. Johnson ,
A. L. Ordoveza ,
W. A. Hardison  and
L. S. Castillo
W. L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.
A. L. Ordoveza
Affiliation:
Dairy Training and Research Institute, College, Laguna, Philippines
W. A. Hardison
Affiliation:
Dairy Training and Research Institute, College, Laguna, Philippines
L. S. Castillo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of the Philippines College of Agriculture, College, Laguna, Philippines
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fifteen digestibility trials were conducted in the wet, early dry, and late dry seasons in the Philippines. Panicum maximum (guinea grass) was fed at growth stages of 1–4 months to Bos taurus (Holstein), Bos indicus (Red Sindhi), and Bos bubalis (water buffalo) bulls.

Significant differences were shown between digestibility coefficients from water buffaloes and those from Holstein cattle, the former having a 5–7 % advantage in most cases. Ratios of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid from the two species were not different. Separate tables of digestible protein, TDN and digestible energy values for guinea grass were computed for cattle and water buffaloes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , October 1967 , pp. 161 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achacoso, A. S. (1956). Digestibility of rice straw alone and in a balanced ration by Philippine steer, grade and pure Murrah carabao, and Holstein cattle. Phil. Agr. 40, 165.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L., & White, K. (1964). The evaluation of artificially dried grass as a source of energy for sheep. Part III. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axtmayer, J. H., Asenjo, C. F. Jr & Cook, D. M. (1938). The nutritive values of some forage crops of Puerto Rico. Part I. J. Agric. Univ. P. Rico 22, 95.Google Scholar
Butterworth, M. H. (1964). The digestible energy content of some tropical forages. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, M. H. (1965). Some aspects of the utilization of tropical forages. Part I. J. Agric Sci., Camb. 65, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, M. H. & Butterworth, J. P. (1965). Some aspects of the utilization of tropical forages. II. Pangola and coastal Bermuda hays. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, M. H. & Chicco, C. F. (1960). A study of the digestibility of forage plants in Venezuela. Part III. Agronomia trop. 10, 47.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. (1942). Digestibility trials on green fodders. Trop. Agric, Trin. 19, 147.Google Scholar
Hebron, P. P. (1955). The digestibility and nutritive value of cogan grass at two stages of growth when fed to a Philippine steer, a Holstein–Friesian bull, a grade Murrah carabao and a Murrah carabao. B.S.A. thesis, University of the Philippines College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Ichhponani, J. S., Makker, G. S., Sidhu, G. S. & Moxon, A. L. (1962). Cellulose digestion in water buffalo and zebu cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 21, 1001.Google Scholar
Ichhponani, J. S. & Sidhu, G. S. (1965). Comparative concentrations of rumen volatile fatty acids in cattle and buffalo. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 921.Google Scholar
Jang, S. & Majumdar, B. N. (1962). A study of comparative digestibilities in different species of ruminants. Ann. Biochem. exp. Med. 22, 303.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W. L., Hardison, W. A. & Castillo, L. S. (1967). The nutritive value of Panicum maximum (guinea grass). I. Yields and chemical composition related to season and herbage growth stage. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 155.Google Scholar
Makkar, G. S. & Sidhu, G. S. (1964). The fractionation of carbohydrates in Indian feedingstuffs and the digestion of different fractions in the rumina of cattle and buffalo. J. Res. Ludhiana 1, 56.Google Scholar
Raghavan, G. V., Kakkar, B., Rao, M. V. N. & Mullick, D. N. (1963). Effects of air temperature and humidity on the metabolism of food nutrients in cattle and buffalo bulls. Ann. Biochem. exp. Med. 23, 23.Google Scholar
Reynolds, P. J. (1962). The separation and estimation of the volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid, Mimeograph, Department of Animal Husbandry, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1947). Feeds of the World. West Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta., Morgantown.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. G. (1959). Continuous culture as a method for studying rumen fermentation. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Wiseman, H. G. & Irvin, H. M. (1957). Determination of organic acids in silage. J. agric. Fd Chem. 5, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Work, S. H. (1946). Digestible nutrient content of some Hawaiian feeds and forages. Tech. Bull. Hawaii agric Exp. Stn, no. 4.Google Scholar