Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T03:06:01.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the survival time of the spermatozoa in the genital tract of the cow and its relation to fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. A. Laing
J. A. Laing
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Experiments were carried out to determine the period of survival of spermatozoa in the genital tract of the cow.

2. No reliable results were obtained by searching, post-mortem, the genital tracts of two cows and three heifers killed at various intervals after insemination.

3. An attempt to induce ovulation at a definite time to which insemination could be related, in order that the survival time of the spermatozoa might be determined by the recovery of the ova post-mortem, was not successful. Of four cows and one heifer given pregnant mare's serum followed by pregnancy urine, one ovulated. To one animal, where a large follicle was present in one ovary, pregnancy urine was given. Ovulation occurred but could not be definitely attributed to the pregnancy urine.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 1945 , pp. 72 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E., McKenzie, F. F., Kennedy, J. W. & Beare, W. W. (1931). Anat. Rec. 48 (suppl. 9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoroso, E. C., Griffiths, W. F. B. & Hamilton, W. J. (1939). Vet. Rec. 51, 168.Google Scholar
Amoroso, E. C., Griffiths, W. F. B. & Hamilton, W. J. (1942). J. Anat., Lond., 76, 377.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1936). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 4, 186.Google Scholar
Assheton, R. (1898 a). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 41, 205Google Scholar
Assheton, R. (1898 b). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 41, 329.Google Scholar
Beshlebnov, A. V. (1938). Probl. Zivotn. no. 2, p. 73. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 6, 291.)Google Scholar
Brewster, J. E., May, R. & Cole, C. L. (1940). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 304.Google Scholar
Clark, R. T. (1934). Anat. Rec. 60, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H. (1930). Amer. J. Anat. 46, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, G. W. & Amsbaugh, A. E. (1917). Anat. Rec. 12, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, F. T. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. I. & Miller, F. W. (1935). Anat. Rec. 62, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferring, N. L. (1937). Diss. München. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 8, 367.)Google Scholar
Gerasimova, A. A. (1938). Probl. Zivotn. no. 12, p. 126.Google Scholar
Gerasimova, A. A., Potopova, N. G., Solovei, M. J. & Hratov, B. P. (1940). Dokl. Akad. Seljs. Nank, no. 13, p. 26. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 13, 26.)Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1927). Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hartman, C. G., Lewis, W. H., Miller, F. W. & Swett, W. W. (1931). Anat. Rec. 48, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuser, C. H. & Streeter, G. L. (1929). Contr. Embryol. Carneg. Instn, no. 109, 20, 1.Google Scholar
Kirillov, V. S. (1937). Probl. Zivotn. no. 3, p. 34. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 5, 278.)Google Scholar
Kozlova, V. M. (1935). Probl. Zivotn. no. 4/5, p. 233. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 4, 35.)Google Scholar
Kupfer, M. (1936). Fmg S. Afr. 11, 184.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. (1945 a). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J. A. (1945 b). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClean, D. & Rowlands, I. W. (1942). Nature, Lond., 150, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. (1940). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 98.Google Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. & Allen, E. (1933). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 328, p. 14.Google Scholar
Mirskaya, L. (1933). Probl. Zivotn. no. 5, p. 100. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 1, 241.)Google Scholar
Mirskaya, L. M. & Petropavlovskii, V. (1937). Probl. Zivotn. no. 4, p. 22. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 51, 387.)Google Scholar
Mirskaya, L. M., Kedrov, V. K. & Lihaceva, A. N. (1938). Probl. Zivotn. no. 3, p. 66. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 8, 15.)Google Scholar
Nalbandov, A. & Casida, L. E. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, G. (1936). The Eggs of Mammals. New York.Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. W., Beck, G. H., Cupps, P. T. & Elliott, I. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott Blair, G. W., Folley, S. J., Malpress, F. H. & Coppen, F. M. V. (1941). Biochem. J. 35, 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimberger, G. W. & Davis, H. P. (1943). Res. Bull. Neb. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 129.Google Scholar
Winters, L. M., Green, W. W. & Comstock, R. E. (1942). Tech. Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 151.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Hammond, J. (1925). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, W. C. (1940). Quart. Rev. Biol. 16, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar