Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T05:09:07.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oestrus and some related phenomena in the buffalo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. S. E. Hafez
E. S. E. Hafez
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Thirty-one buffalo-cows of different ages were tested for the symptoms and duration of oestrus, and the incidence of post-partum oestrus and conception. Clinical examinations of the vagina were also carried out.

2. The symptoms of heat were less intense than in cattle and there was no homosexual activity.

3. Pro-oestrus occurred in 43% of the cases with an average duration of 21.20 hr. whilst metoestrus occurred in 67% of the cases with an average duration of 19.20 hr. The average duration of oestrus was 28.47 hr.

4. The onset and cessation of oestrus were either abrupt or gradual. The phenomenon ‘split oestrus’ was observed intervening normal cycles. This was not characteristic of the individuals.

5. The average interval to post-partum oestrus was 43.80 days. The average number of silent heats per individual was 0.86. Conception took place after an average of 1.71 services whilst the breeding efficiency was 93% in the calving buffaloes.

6. Normal clinical changes in the vagina (temperature; nature and amount of secretion; picture of smear) were not reliable indicators of oestrus.

7. Further problems concerning reproduction in the buffalo are suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1954 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, F. N. & McKenzie, F. F. (1941). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 329.Google Scholar
Badreldin, A. L. (1952). Experientia, 8, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranov, A. G. (1941). Sovetsak. Zooteh. no. 1, 65. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 11, 31.)Google Scholar
Cowie, A. T. (1948). Publ. Commonw. Agric. Bur. no. 13.Google Scholar
Dave, C. N. (1938). Agric. Live-Stk. India, 5, 47.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1952 a). Indian J. Vet. Sci. & Anim. Husb. 22, 257.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1952 b). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 21, 15.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1953). Res. Bull. Cairo Faculty of Agric. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1927). Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1949). 14th Int. Vet. Congr. (London), Sec. 4(e), p. 5.Google Scholar
Hansel, W., Asdell, S. A. & Roberts, S. J. (1949). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 10, 221.Google Scholar
Kaleff, B. (1932). Z. Zücht. 24 B, 391.Google Scholar
Kaleff, B. (1942). Z. Tierz. Zücht Biol. 51, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, C. O. (1920). J. Hered. 11, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoud, I. N. (1949). Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agric., Cairo University.Google Scholar
Manresa, M. & Diapo, D. (1939). Philipp.Agric. 28, 286.Google Scholar
McGregor, R. (1941). Vet. Rec. 53, 443.Google Scholar
Ocampo, A. R. (1939). Philipp. Agric. 28, 286.Google Scholar
Opperman, J. G. S. (1949). B.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W., Fraps, R. M. & Frank, A. H. (1945). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 6, 165.Google Scholar
Roark, D. B. & Herman, H. A. (1950). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 455.Google Scholar
Shortridge, G. C. (1934). The Mammals of South West Africa, vol. 2, p. 439. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Villegas, V. (1928). Philipp. Agric. 17, 477.Google Scholar
Zoo, (1953). Records of Zoological Gardens, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar