Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T12:30:11.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potassium reserves in British soils. I. The Rothamsted Classical Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. Talibudeen  and
S. K. Dey
O. Talibudeen
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
S. K. Dey
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Thirty-four soils from the Rothamsted Experiments were exhaustively cropped with ryegrass in the glasshouse. The concentration and yield of potassium in ryegrass tops and the potassium intensity in the soil were measured every 4 weeks, after harvesting the grass.

The change in K-intensity of soils, rich in potassium, with exhaustion differed from that of ‘poor’ soils. This change was related to the rate of change of the cumulative K-yield. The rate of change of soil K-intensity demarcated periods of intense and limited exhaustion and partial recovery of the soil during cropping.

The cumulative K-yield of ryegrass was very significantly related to the K-intensity of the uncropped soil; the ‘16-week’ yield was slightly better related than the ‘60-week’ yield. For Park Grass soils, the relationship was improved by allowing for variations in soil pH.

The K-intensity of all soils, with or without manuring, decreased to nearly 10-3 (M)½ in (AR)0 units after 16 weeks cropping, although large differences in K-yield persisted until much later.

K-buffer capacity per unit clay content of the soil, measured by a laboratory method, was inversely related to the K-intensity of the uncropped soil. The K-buffer capacities of soils rich in potassium, measured in laboratory and glasshouse experiments, were significantly related, but were unrelated for ‘poor’ soils. The K-buffer capacity (laboratory method) of Rothamsted soils with different manurial treatments was only very approximately related to the cumulative K-yield.

Less K was taken up from all Rothamsted soils given nitrogen fertilizer in the field and their K intensities were also smaller than the corresponding soils without ‘N’. Field liming of acid soils decreased their K-intensity and increased their K-buffer capacity, presumably because more potassium was removed by the field crop.

A rapid method is suggested for measuring potassium intensities of soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , August 1968 , pp. 95 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, P. W. (1962). The potassium status of some English soils considered as a problem of energy relationships. Proc. Fertil. Soc. No. 72, 25–43.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. W. & Close, B. M. (1961a). Potassium-releasing power of soils from the Agdell rotation experiment assessed by glasshouse cropping. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57, 381–6.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. W. & Close, B. M. (1961b). Release of non-exchangeable potassium from some British soils cropped in the glasshouse. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, P. H. T. (1964). Studies on soil potassium. II. The ‘Immediate’ Q/I relations of labile potassium in the soil. J. Soil Sci. 15, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deist, J. & Talibudeen, O. (1967). Ion exchange in soils from the ion pairs K–Ca, K–Rb and K–Na. J. Soil Sci. 18, 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, B. C. & Beckett, P. H. T. (1962). A new procedure for studying the release and fixation of potassium ions in soil. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 59–64.Google Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station, 1966. Details of the Classical and Long-Term Experiments up to 1962, 87 pp.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K. (1947). A ratio law governing the equilibrium of cations in the soil solution. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Pure appl. Chem., London 3, 257–61.Google Scholar
Talibudeen, O. & Dey, S. K. Potassium reserves in British soils. II. Soils from different parent materials. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Taylor, A. W. (1958). Some equilibrium solution studies on Rothamsted soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 22, 511–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidyanathan, L. V. & Talibudeen, O. (1965). A laboratory method for the evaluation of nutrient residues in soils. Pl. Soil 23, 371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1960). The Exhaustion Land site. Rep. Rothamsted Exp. Sin for 1959, pp. 230–9.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1962). Barnfleld. Rep. Rothamsted Exp. Stn for 1961, pp. 227–47.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1964). The Park Grass Experiment. Rep. Rothamsted Exp. Stn for 1963, pp. 240–62.Google Scholar
Woodruff, C. M (1955a) Ionic equilibria between clay and dilute salt solutions. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 19, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, C. M. (1955b). Cation activities in the soil solution and energies of cationic exchange. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 19, 98–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, C. M. (1955c). The energies of replacement of calcium by potassium in soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 19, 167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar