Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:40:30.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on calcium and magnesium in the alimentary tract of sheep II. The effect of reducing the acidity of abomasal digesta in vitro on the distribution of calcium and magnesium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. E. Storry
J. E. Storry
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Increasing the pH of abomasal contents of the sheep in vitro reduced the concentrations of ultrafilterable calcium and magnesium due to the binding of these ions to suspended material in the digesta. In the presence of this material such binding prevented the precipitation of calcium phosphate and magnesium ammonium phosphate which would otherwise have occurred about pH 6·0. Calcium and magnesium soap formation was eliminated as a possible factor contributing to the reduced concentrations of ultrafilterable calcium and magnesium.

2. At saturation the binding capacity of the material was greater for calcium than magnesium. Although some of the binding sites were common to both ions calcium was more strongly bound. The bound and ultrafilterable forms of both elements were in equilibrium.

3. The significance of these findings is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , August 1961 , pp. 103 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ash, R. W. (1959). J. Physiol. 149, 72P.Google Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, Y. (1925). J. Biol. Chem. 66, 375.Google Scholar
Fontenot, J. P., Miller, R. W., Whitehair, C. K. & Macvicar, R. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 127.Google Scholar
Garton, G. A. (1951). J. Exp. Biol. 28, 358.Google Scholar
Garton, G. A. (1959). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 18, 112.Google Scholar
Garton, G. A. (1960). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 30, 1.Google Scholar
Head, M. J. & Rook, J. A. F. (1957). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 16, 25.Google Scholar
Hilditch, T. P. (1956). The Chemical Constitution of Natural Fats, p. 152, 3rd ed.London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. (1957). The transport of ammonia from the digestive tract of the sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
King, E. J. (1951). Micro-Analysis in Medical Biochemistry, p. 68, 2nd ed.London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1942). Digestion in the ruminant. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. (1957). Rep. Nat. Inst. Res. Dairying, University of Reading, p. 78.Google Scholar
Shorland, F. B. (1944). Nature, Lond., 153, 168.Google Scholar
Simensen, M. G. (1959). Commun. XVIth Int. Vet. Congr., Madrid, 2, 85.Google Scholar
Storry, J. E. (1960). Studies on calcium and magnesium in the ruminant in relation to the aetiology of grass tetany. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Storry, J. E. (1961 a). Nature, Lond. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Storry, J. E. (1961 b). J. agric Sci. 57, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, R. M. & Allen, R. S. (1957). J. Agric. Fd Chem. 5, 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar