Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T09:16:38.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The utilization of the energy of different rations by sheep and cattle for maintenance and for fattening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. L. Blaxter  and
F. W. Wainman
K. L. Blaxter
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
F. W. Wainman
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Six diets in which the percentage of hay varied from 0 to 100% and the percentage of flaked maize varied conversely from 100 to 0% were each given to three sheep and three steers in a series of 72 calorimetric experiments. In addition the fasting metabolism of each animal was determined on two occasions.

2. The loss of energy in the faeces increased linearly with the percentage of flaked maize in the diet, but the loss of N in the faeces did not, the loss being proportionately smaller for diets containing more than 60 % maize.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , August 1964 , pp. 113 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armsby, H. P. & Fbies, J. A. (1917). J. Agric. Res. 10, 599.Google Scholar
Armstbong, D. G. & Blaxter, K. L. (1956). Proa. Nutr. Soc. 15, i.Google Scholar
Armstbong, D. G. & Blaxteb, K. L. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. MoC. (1960). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19, xxxi.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. Mcc., & Wainman, F. W. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axellson, J. (1939). Tierernahrung, 11, 176.Google Scholar
Axellson, J. (1946). K. LantbrAkad. Tidsskr. 94, 259.Google Scholar
Barker, S. B. & Summerson, W. H. (1941). J. Biol. Chem. 138, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Orassl. Congr. p. 479.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). E.A.A.P. Pub. No. 10, p. 211.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Martin, A. K. (1962). E.A.A.P. Publ. No. 10, p. 200.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Rook, J. A. F. (1953). Brit. J. Nutr. 7, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wilson, R. S. (1963). Anim. Prod. 5, 1, 27.Google Scholar
Breibem, K. (1944). K. LantbrAkad. Tidsskr. 93, 345.Google Scholar
Breirem, K. (1953). Tidsskr. Det. Norske Landbruk. 60, 25.Google Scholar
Breibem, K. (1954). Die Nettoenergie als Grundlage der Bewertung der Futtermittel. In Festschrift anlässlich des 100-jährigen Bestehens der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchsstation Leipzig-Möckern. Bd. II, p. 91. Ed. Nehring, K..Google Scholar
Carrol, E. J. & Hungate, R. E. (1955). Arch. Biochem. 56, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynabd, L. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. B. (1933). Science, 77, 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W., Kriss, M. & Swift, R. W. (1931). J. Agric. Res. 43, 1015.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W., Kriss, M., Swift, R. W., Black, A., Frear, D. E., Kahlenbebq, O. J., Mcclure, F. J. & Voris, Le R. (1933). J. Agric. Res. 46, 753.Google Scholar
James, A. T. & Martin, A. J. P. (1952). Biochem. J. 50, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, O. & KÖhler, A. (1900). Landw. Versuchs. 53, 1.Google Scholar
Kriss, M. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. K. & Blaxter, K. L. (1962). Brit. J. Nutr. 16, 397.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1934). Science, 80, 558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, R. W. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1958a). E.A.A.P. Publ. No. 8, p. 85.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1958b). E.A.A.P. Publ. No. 8, p. 80.Google Scholar