Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T07:22:17.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The value of potato peelings in the nutrition of the bacon pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Woodman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge

Extract

Mechanical peeling of potatoes removes an exceedingly thin skin that is notably richer in ether extract, fibre and lime, but much poorer in N-free extractives, than the thicker parings obtained by ordinary hand peeling. The latter, in respect of their general composition, do not differ to any marked extent from whole potatoes.

The results of digestion trials with pigs have shown that potato peelings, after cooking, are highly digestible when included in the rations of bacon pigs. The N-free extractives, which form about 80% of the dry matter of the hand peelings, have a digestion coefficient of 96·2%. An allowance of 5 lb. of such peelings supplies as much digestible organic matter as 4 lb. of whole potatoes, and it is concluded that 1 lb. of barley meal in the rations of bacon pigs may be replaced by 4 lb. of potatoes or by 5 lb. of potato peelings. Both the potatoes and the potato peelings should be cooked before feeding.

In conclusion, the writers take this opportunity of expressing their thanks to Messrs V. Thurlbourn and C. Bendall, in whose experienced hands the care of the experimental animals was placed during the digestion trials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kellner, O. (1926). The Scientific Feeding of Animals (translated by Goodwin, W.), Lond.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1942). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 124.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. B. & Evans, R. E. (1943). J. Agric. Sci. 33, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar