Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T21:46:12.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water displacement of soils and the soil solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

John S. Burd  and
J. C. Martin
John S. Burd
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
J. C. Martin
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The use of a positive air pressure on closely packed soils decreases the time of recovery and increases the yield of solution obtained by water displacement.

2. Equipment and technique for the recovery of displaced solutions is described.

3. Data from three sandy loams and two silty clay loams are reported.

4. Successive displaced solutions of equal electrical conductivity were obtained from each soil. The concentration thus measured was in each case the same as that of the liquid obtained without the use of displacing water.

5. Concentrations of individual ions in successive portions of displaced solution are uniform in soils at optimum and this also appears to be true at half optimum.

6. There is an inverse proportion between total moisture content of soil and concentration of displaced solution as indicated by measurements of specific resistance.

7. When the solution displaced by water from a given mass of soil was used as displacing agent on another portion of the same soil, the newly displaced solution had the same concentration of electrolytes as the displacing solution. The opinion is expressed that this result indicates that the displaced solution has the same concentration as the solution with which it came in contact in the soil.

8. Typical differences in behaviour of the various solutes in displaced solutions are discussed.

9. The significance and limitations of water extractions of soils are discussed in the light of the results from displaced solutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 1923 , pp. 265 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bouyoucos, G. J. (1917). Measurement of the inactive, or unfree, moisture in the soil by means of the dilatometer method. In Journ. Agr. Res. 8, No. 6, pp. 195–217, 1 fig.Google Scholar
(2)Bouyouoos, G. J. and McCool, M. M. (1916). The freezing-point method as a new means of measuring the concentrations of the soil solution directly in the Soil Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 24.Google Scholar
(3)Burd, John S. (1918). Water extraction of soils as criteria of their crop-producing power. In Journ. Agr. Res. 12, No. 6, pp. 297–309.Google Scholar
(4)Burd, John S. (1918). Chemical criteria, crop-production and physical classification in two soil classes. In Soil Science, 5, No. 5. 05, 1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Burgess, P. S. (1922). The soil solution, extracted by Lipman's direct pressure method, compared with 1: 5 water extracts. In Soil Science, 14, No. 3, pp. 191–212, 2 Plates. September, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Hoagland, D. R. (1918). The freezing-point method as an index of variations in the soil solution due to season and crop growth. In Journ. Agr. Res. 12, No. 6, pp. 369–395, 9 figs.Google Scholar
(7)Hoagland, D. R., Martin, J. C. and Stewart, G. R. (1920). Relation of the soil solution to the soil extract. In Journ. Agr. Res. 20, No. 5, pp. 381–395. December 1st, 1920.Google Scholar
(8)Keen, B. A. (1914). The evaporation of water from soils. Journ. Agr. Sci. 6, 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Lipman, C. B. (1918). A new method of extracting the soil solution. In Univ. Calif. Publ. Agric. Sci. Series, 3, No. 7, pp. 131–134.Google Scholar
(10)Morgan, J. F. (1917). The soil solution obtained by the oil pressure method. In Soil Sci. 3, No. 6, pp. 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Northrup, Zoe (1918). The true soil solution. In Science, N.S., 47, 1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(12)Parker, F. W. (1921). Methods of studying the concentration and composition of the soil solution. In Soil Sci. 12, No. 3, pp. 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Sohreiner, O. and Failyer, G. H. (1906). The absorption of phosphates and potassium by soils. Bul. 32, Bur. Soils, U.S.D.A.Google Scholar
(14)Stewart, G. R. (1918). Effect of season and crop growth in modifying the soil extract. In Journ. Agr. Res. 12, No. 6, pp. 311–368, 24 figs., Pl. 1.Google Scholar