Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-n6p7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-24T00:41:26.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Democracy-Promotion Gap in American Public Opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2007

Abstract

United States foreign-policymakers have enthusiastically backed policies of promoting democracy abroad. But do the American people support these plans? Evidence from polls reveals that while people generally like the idea of exporting freedom, they do not view it as a top priority. Other concepts such as political and economic security are valued more by the American public. Backing for democracy promotion also seems to be waning in recent years. I examine these issues and offer possible reasons for this “gap” in response to democracy promotion among American people. I also explain the implications of these findings for America's foreign policy, including the types of government the US appears to support in the wake of military operations. I conclude with an examination of why the policy of democracy promotion has not been more popular with the American people, evaluating competing arguments that the policy is flawed, as opposed to simply a case of poor public relations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Richman, Alvin, “Trends: American Support for International Involvement: General and Specific Components of Post-Cold War Changes (in the Polls),” Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 2 (1996), 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Commission on Presidential Debates, “The Second Carter–Ford Presidential Debate,” 6 Oct. 1976. Debate delivered at the Palace of Fine Arts Theater, San Francisco, CA.

3 Kaplan, Robert D., “Kissinger, Metternich, and Realism,” Atlantic, 283, 6 (1999), 7382Google Scholar; and Schulzinger, Robert D., “Foreign Policy and Elections: The Durability of Bipartisanship,” USIA Electronic Journals, 1, 14 (1996)Google Scholar.

4 James E. Carter, “Inaugural Address,” speech delivered in Washington, DC, 20 Jan. 1977.

5 George H. W. Bush, “Inaugural Address,” speech delivered in Washington, DC, 20 Jan. 1989; and Martin Walker, “Edwards vs. Kerry on Policy,” Washington Times, 7 June 2004.

6 Anthony Lake, “Defining Missions, Setting Deadlines: Meeting New Security Challenges in the Post-Cold War World,” speech delivered at George Washington University, Washington, DC, 6 March 1996.

7 Tures, John A., “Operation Exporting Freedom: The Quest for Democratization via a United States Military Operation,” Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 7, 1 (2005), 97111Google Scholar.

8 de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno and Downs, George W., “Why Gun-Barrel Democracy Doesn't Work,” Hoover Digest, 2 (2004).Google Scholar

9 Americans cheered during the recent wave of democracy, as the Berlin Wall crumbled and freedom came to Eastern Europe. Symbols of democratizations abroad, such as Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi, and Vaclav Havel, have become celebrities in America. Hollywood films are quick to show loosely factual or even fictitious cases of freedom triumphing over a tyrant.

10 “Gallup/CCFR Survey of American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy 1986,” Gallup/Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 30 Oct.–12 Nov. 1986.

11 “Do You Think the U.S. Government Should Try to Promote Democracy around the World?” ABC News/Washington Post, 10–14 Feb. 1989.

12 “New World Order – What that Peace Should Be,” Americans Talk Security, 19–24 March 1991. Poll conducted by Market Strategies.

13 “International Policy Opinion Survey,” Times Mirror, 9–15 Sept. 1993. Poll conducted by the Princeton Survey Research Associates.

14 “People and the Press: Global Attitudes Survey,” Pew Research Center, 9–15 Sept. 2002. Poll conducted by the Princeton Survey Research Associates.

15 George W. Bush, “State of the Union,” speech delivered in Washington, DC, 20 Jan. 2004.

16 As quoted by Marie Horrigan, “Bush Foreign Policy Speech Knocks Realists,” United Press International, 2 June 2004.

17 Condoleezza Rice, “A Balance of Power that Favors Freedom,” Wriston Lecture delivered at the Manhattan Institute, New York City, 1 Oct. 2002.

18 As quoted by Ghassan Al-Atiyyah, “The Road Map to Democratic Governance in Post-Saddam Iraq,” Daily Star, 23 Sept. 2002.

19 “Promoting and Defending Democracy in the World,” Americans Talk Security, 22–27 March 1988. Poll conducted by Marttila and Kiley Inc.

20 Martin Walker, “Edwards vs. Kerry on Polic.”

21 John F. Kerry, “Security and Strength for a New World,” speech delivered at the Seattle Center in Seattle, WA, 27 May 2004; and Jackson Diehl, “Kerry the Realist,” Washington Post, 7 June 2004, A23.

22 Martin Walker, “Edwards vs. Kerry on Policy.”

23 “Grenada Survey,” ABC News/Washington Post, 25 Oct. 1983.

24 “Gallup/CCFR Survey of American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy 1986,” Gallup/Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 30 Oct.–12 Nov. 1986.

25 “New World Order – What that Peace Should Be.”

26 “International Policy Opinion Survey.”

27 “Do You Support or Oppose the United States Using Its Superpower Status to Promote Democracy around the World?” Fox News, 25–26 Feb. 2003.

28 “America's Evangelicals,” US News & World Report, 16 March–4 April 2004. Poll conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research.

29 “Worldviews 2002 Survey,” Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 1–30 June 2002. Poll conducted by Harris Interactive.

30 “America's Place in the World: Callback Survey,” Pew Research Center, 15–21 Oct. 2001. Poll conducted by the Princeton Survey Research Associates.

31 “United States Foreign Policy Goals,” Gallup Organization, 3–6 Feb. 2003.

32 “United States Foreign Policy Goals,” NBC News/Wall Street Journal, 18–22 May 1990.

33 “What Do You Think Is the Most Important Reason for the United States to Take Military Action against Iraq?” Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, 11–12 March 2003.

34 “In Order to Help Promote Democracy in Russia, Do You Think the United States Should or Should not Give Financial Aid to Russia?” CBS News, 18–19 Oct. 1993.

35 “US Foreign Policy Goals in the Middle East,” Los Angeles Times, 15–18 Nov. 2003.

36 Ottaway, Marina, “Promoting Democracy after Conflict: The Difficult Choices,” International Studies Perspectives, 4, 3 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Commission on Presidential Debates, “The Second Bush–Gore Presidential Debate,” 11 Oct. 2000. Debate delivered at Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.

38 Ivan Eland, “The Empire Has no Clothes,” Independent Institute, 10 Sept. 2003.

39 Bueno de Mesquita and Downs, “Why Gun-Barrel Democracy Doesn't Work”.

42 Minxin Pei, Samia Amin, and Seth Garz, “Why Nation-Building Fails in Mid-course,” International Herald Tribune, 17 Mar. 2004.

43 Mohammed Shaker Abdallah, “Blood for ‘Democracy,’” Middle East & International Review, 2 (2002); Ahmad Faruqui, “Battling for the Soul of the American Republic,” Asia Times, 4, 30 (2003); Stephen D. Krasner, “We Don't Know How to Build Democracy,” Los Angeles Times, 26 Nov. 2003; Chappell Lawson and Strom C. Tucker, “Democracy? In Iraq?” Hoover Digest, 3 (2003); and Larry Diamond, “The Long Haul,” Hoover Digest, 2 (2004).

44 David Reilly, “Peace through Coercion: The Effect of Foreign Military Intervention on Democratization and War,” Online Journal of Peace and Conflict Resolution 2, 1 (1999); and Nils Petter Gleditsch, Lene Siljeholm Christiansen, and Havard Hegre, “Democratic Jihad? Military Intervention and Democracy,” paper presented at the workshop on Resources, Governance Structure, and Civil War, Uppsala, Sweden, 13–18 April 2004.

45 John A. Tures, “Operation Exporting Freedom.”

46 “US Foreign Policy Goals in the Middle East.”

47 “Bush Edges Kerry,” Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, 22–23 June 2004.

48 “Showdown in the Middle East,” Americans Talk Security, 21–26 Sept. 1990. Poll conducted by Market Strategies.

49 Bueno de Mesquita and Downs, “Why Gun-Barrel Democracy Doesn't Work”.

50 The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Peter Pace, claimed that the problems in Iraq are the result of the United States military inadequately explaining to the American people what is going on in Iraq in a speech at the National Defense University in Fort McNair (Robert Burns, “Pace: Message of Iraq Progress Stymied,” Associated Press, 1 Dec. 2005). On the same day it was revealed that members of the United States Defense Department and contractors were paying Iraqi newspapers to publishing propaganda stories casting America's efforts in Iraq in a positive light (Jamie Wilson, “Pentagon Pays Iraqi Papers to Print Its ‘Good News’ Stories,” Guardian, 1 Dec. 2005).

51 As Forsythe and Rieffer note, “Democracy building is not very glamorous work, does not lend itself to patriotic flag waving by political leaders in Washington, and takes much longer than the typical American attention-span favors.” David P. Forsythe and Barbara Ann J. Rieffer, “U.S. Foreign Policy and Enlarging the Democratic Community,” Human Rights Quarterly, 22, 4 (2000), 988–1010.

52 CBS, “Poll: Iraq War Takes Toll on U.S.,” 16 Sept. 2005 (New York); and CBS, “Poll: Fading Support For Iraq War,” 10 Oct. 2005 (New York).

53 Harris Poll, “Iraq, 9/11, Al-Qaeda, and Weapons of Mass Destruction: What the Public Believes Now, According to the Latest Harris Poll,” 21 Oct. 2004, Harris Interactive, Poll #79.

54 David P. Forsythe, “Democracy, War and Covert Action,” Journal of Peace Research, 29, 4 (1992), 385–95.

55 Forsythe and Rieffer.

56 CBS, “Poll: Iraq War Takes Toll On U.S.,”; CBS “Poll: Fading Support For Iraq War.”

57 Shaker Abdallah, “Blood for ‘Democracy.’”

58 One may wonder why American elites are more enthusiastic about democracy promotion than are the masses. As noted by Bueno de Mesquita and Downs (“Why Gun-Barrel Democracy Doesn't Work”), such support for freedom gives the leaders the appearance of being on the side “of angels.” A democratic government appears to be easier for American foreign-policymakers to control than an independent-minded autocracy. John A. Tures, “The Impact of Instability and Institutions on U.S. Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Areas,” Journal of Conflict, Security and Development, 3, 2 (2003), 163–83.

59 Data for these polls was provided by the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut.