66 The influence of 1970s drug laws on mass incarceration has been well documented. See Garland, David, The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Alexander, Michelle, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness (New York: New Press, 2010)Google Scholar. These policies drew on racially coded “color-blind” campaigns to urge for a reduction in welfare aid. See Lassiter, Mathew, The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; and Fornter, Michael Javen, The Black Silent Majority: The Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Politics of Punishment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015)Google Scholar. Who should be entitled to welfare was a significant debate of the twentieth century. Klein, Jennifer, in For All These Rights: Business, Labor, and the Shaping of America's Public–Private Welfare State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, examines the New Deal foundation for these debates in the mixture of public and private welfare policy. The gendered, racialized, and sexualized aspects of these debates are detailed in Gordon's, Linda “Social Insurance and Public Assistance: The Influence of Gender in Welfare Thought in the U.S., 1890–1935,” American Historical Review, 97 (Feb. 1992), 19–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Canaday's, Margot The Straight State: Sexuality and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.