Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T04:01:05.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lockean Sensationalism and American Literary Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Ian F. A. Bell
Affiliation:
Ian F. A. Bell is Lecturer in the Department of American Studies, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs ST5 5BG.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dressman, Michael R., “Another Whitman Debt to Emerson,” Notes and Queries, N.S., 26, 3 (08 1979), 305–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Dressman compares the following passage from Whitman with the succeeding one from Emerson:“ …the term right means literally only straight. Wrong primarily meant twisted, distorted. Integrity meant oneness. Spirit meant breath, or flame. A supercilious person was one who raise'd his eyebrows” (“Slang in America,” Prose Works 1892, 2, Collect and Other Prose, ed. Floyd Stovall, The Collected Writings of Walt Whitman, ed. Wilson, Gay and Bradley, Sculley, New York University Press, New York, 1964, p. 573)Google Scholar. “Right originally meant straight; wrong means twisted. Spirit primarily means wind; transgression, the crossing of a line: supercilious, the raising of the eyebrow” (“Nature”, The collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1, Nature, Addresses and Lectures, ed. Ferguson, Alfred R., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971, p. 18)Google Scholar.

2 Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (thirtieth edition, Thomas Tegg, London, 1846), p. 289Google Scholar.

3 Emerson, “Nature,” p. 18.

4 Whitman, “Slang in America,” p. 573.

5 Locke, p. 381.

7 Whitman, p. 577.

8 Emerson, p. 18.

9 “Because of this radical correspondence between visible things and human thoughts, savages, who have only what is necessary, converse in figures. as we go back in history, language becomes more picturesque, until its infancy, when it is all poetry; or, all spiritual facts are represented by natural symbols” (Ibid., p. 19).

10 Ibid., p. 20.

11 Fenollosa, Ernest. The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry, ed. Pound, Ezra (1920), City Lights Books, San Francisco, n.d., p. 22Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., p. 25.