Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T02:11:31.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some remarks on regression with autoregressive errors and their residual processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

R. J. Kulperger*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
*
Postal address: Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, Faculty of Science, Room 3005 EMSc, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B9.

Abstract

We consider some linear regression models Y = Σα lfl(z) + X, where X is an autoregressive (AR) process. The residuals estimate the i.i.d. innovations sequence which drives the AR process. We then consider the partial sum process of the residuals and show they converge to Brownian bridges in certain cases. Some remarks are also made on similar processes when differencing is first applied to remove trends. When an AR process is differenced the residual partial sum can be asymptotically a random polynomial.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1987 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, grant number A5724.

References

Billingsley, P. (1968) Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. (1976) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Pierce, D. A. (1970) Distribution of residual autocorrelations in autoregressive-integrated moving average time series models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 65, 15091526.Google Scholar
Chitturi, R. V. (1974) Distribution of the residual autocorrelations in multiple autoregressive schemes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69, 928934.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. (1973) Weak convergence of the sample distribution function when parameters are estimated. Ann. Statist. 1, 279290.Google Scholar
El-Sharaawi, A. and Esterby, S. (1982) Time Series Methods in Hydrosciences., Developements in Water Sciences 17, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hannan, E. J. (1970) Multiple Time Series. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Jandhyala, V. K. and Kulperger, R. J. (1985) Estimation of the autoregressive parameters in some non-stationary ARMA(p, 1) models. Technical Report, Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Koerts, J. (1967) Some further notes on disturbance estimates in regression analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 62, 169183.Google Scholar
Kulperger, R. J. (1985) On the residuals of autoregressive processes and polynomial regression. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 21, 107118.Google Scholar
Loynes, R. M. (1980) The empirical distribution function of residuals from generalized regression. Ann. Statist. 8, 285298.Google Scholar
Macneill, I. B. (1974) Tests for change of parameter at unknown times and distributions of some related functionals on Brownian motion. Ann. Statist. 2, 950962.Google Scholar
Macneill, I. B. (1978) Properties of sequences of partial sums of polynomial regression residuals with applications to tests for change of regression at unknown times. Ann. Statist. 6, 422433.Google Scholar
Macneill, B. and Jandhyala, V. K. (1985) The residual process for non-linear regression. J. Appl Prob. 22, 957963.Google Scholar
Mcleod, A. I. (1978) On the distribution of residual autocorrelations in Box–Jenkins models. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 40, 296302.Google Scholar
Pierce, D. A. (1985) Testing normality in autoregressive models. Biometrika 72, 293297.Google Scholar
Pierce, D. A. and Kopecky, K. J. (1979) Testing goodness of fit for the distribution of errors in regression models. Biometrika 66, 15.Google Scholar
Tiao, G. C. and Tsay, R. S. (1983) Consistency properties of least squares estimates of autoregressive parameters in ARMA models. Ann. Statist. 11, 856871.Google Scholar