Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-rnj55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-08T08:39:02.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Council on Wage and Price Stability: A Retrospective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Thomas Hopkins*
Affiliation:
Economics, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA, e-mail: thopkins42@gmail.com
Laura Stanley
Affiliation:
Mercatus Center at George Mason University, USA

Abstract

Applying benefit-cost analysis in the White House regulatory oversight process served as a basic mission of the Council on Wage and Price Stability (CWPS) during its seven-year lifespan (1974–1981). This paper reviews that CWPS experience, which involved filing comments in over 300 proceedings at more than 25 federal regulatory agencies. The paper draws on those CWPS public comments (filings), identifying persistent and pervasive deficiencies in the economic analysis regulators then and now often use as support for new regulation. CWPS filings fostered greater acceptance of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory decisions; such analysis is now required by executive order.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Paul(2014). Sugar Subsidies: Lawsuit Pulls the Curtain Back on ‘Big Sugar’, Palm Beach Post; March 5.Google Scholar
Broder, Ivy et al. (Council on Wage and Price Stability), Proposed Drinking Water Regulations, Comments Submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency, September 1978, http://cwps.mercatus.org/wp-content/uploads/101401-change-2.pdf.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary(2013). Moving Toward the Evaluation State, Penn Program on Regulation RegBlog, December 9.Google Scholar
DeMuth, Christopher (2012). The Regulatory State. National Affairs, (12); (Summer).Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Quality Service (1980). Prohibition of PCB-Containing Equipment or Machinery and Liquid Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Federally-Inspected Meat Establishments, Poultry Product Establishments and Egg Product Plants: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 45 Fed. Reg. 30980.Google Scholar
Department of Transportation Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety (1978). Hours of Service of Drivers: Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 43 Fed. Reg. 21905.Google Scholar
Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2000). Hours of Service of Drivers; Driver Rest and Sleep for Safe Operations: Proposed Rule.65 Fed. Reg. 25540, https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2000/05/02/00-10703/hours-of-service-of-drivers-driver-rest-and-sleep-for-safe-operations#h-20.Google Scholar
Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2011) Hours of Service Final Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis. RIN 2126-AB26 (December 2011): ES-4.Google Scholar
Department of Transportation (2013). New Hours-of-Service Safety Regulations to Reduce Truck Driver Fatigue Begin Today, Press Release. FMCSA 40-13, July 1.Google Scholar
Eads, George C. & Fix, Michael (1984). Relief or Reform? Reagan’s Regulatory Dilemma. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Ellig, Jerry & McLaughlin, Patrick A. (2012). The Quality and Use of Regulatory Analysis in 2008. Risk Analysis, 32(5).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellig, Jerry, McLaughlin, Patrick A. & Morrall, John F. III (2012). Continuity, Change, and Priorities: The Quality and Use of Regulatory Analysis across US Administrations. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 153173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellig, Jerry(2013). Improving Regulatory Impact Analysis through Process Reform: Testimony Before the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee, June 26.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (1978a). Control of Organic Chemical Contaminants in Drinking Water: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 43 Fed. Reg. 21943.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (1978b). Proposed Regulations for Control of Organic Chemical Contaminants in Drinking Water. 43 Fed. Reg. 29135.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (1979). Control of Organic Chemical Contaminants in Drinking Water: Final Rule. 44 Fed. Reg. 68624.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (1981). Abeyance of Proposed Rule: Reductions in Use of PCBs at Agricultural Pesticide and Fertilizer Facilities. 46 Fed. Reg. 25411, 25411–18; further PCB regulatory developments across the agencies are not here examined.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (1985). Costs and Benefits of Reducing Lead in Gasoline: Final Regulatory Impact Analysis (EPA-230-05-85-006).Google Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration (1979), Aircraft and Airport Security: Air Carrier Operations – Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 44 Fed. Reg. 63048.Google Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration (1981), Airplane and Airport Operator Security: Final Rule. 46 Fed. Reg. 3782.Google Scholar
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2011a). Hours of Service of Drivers, Final Rule. 76 Fed. Reg. 81134.Google Scholar
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2011b). Hours of Service of Drivers, Final Rule. 76 Fed. Reg. 81139.Google Scholar
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2011c). Hours of Service of Drivers, Final Rule. 76 Fed. Reg. at 81141–42.Google Scholar
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2011d). Hours of Service of Drivers, Final Rule. 76 Fed. Reg. at 81138.Google Scholar
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2014). Hours of Service of Drivers, Notice of Suspension Of Enforcement. 79 Fed. Reg. 76241-42.Google Scholar
Graham, John D. (2008). Saving Lives through Administrative Law and Economics. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 395.Google Scholar
Gayer, Ted & Viscusi, W. Kip (2013). Overriding Consumer Preferences with Energy Regulations. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 43(3), 248264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. et al. (2000). Assessing Regulatory Impact Analyses: The Failure of Agencies to Comply with Executive Order 12866. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 23(3), 859871.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. & Dudley, Patrick (2007). How Well Does the Government Do Cost-Benefit Analysis? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(2), 192211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. & Litan, Robert (2005). Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs: Lessons for the U.S. and Europe. Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2), 473508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. & Tetlock, Paul C. (2008). Has Economic Analysis Improved Regulatory Decisions? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 6784 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Winston(2006). Grading Estimates of the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulation: A Review of Reviews. Discussion Paper 06-39, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, September.Google Scholar
Harrington, Winston, Morgenstern, Richard & Nelson, Peter (2000). On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2), 297332.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Thomas D. (1978). Current Inflationary Conditions and Regulatory Measures of the Council on Wage and Price Stability. In Papers and Proceedings of a Symposium on Inflation (p. 20). Knoxville: University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Thomas D. et al. (Council on Wage and Price Stability) (1976), An Evaluation of the Inflation Impact Statement Program. Report prepared for the White House Economic Policy Board, Dec. 7, p. 17, http://www.thecre.com/ombpapers/Ford.htm#f2.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Thomas D., Lenard, Thomas M., Morrall, John F. III & Pinkston, Elizabeth A. (1981). A Review of the Regulatory Interventions of the Council on Wage and Price Stability, 1974–1980. Washington, DC: Council on Wage and Price Stability; January, available at http://cowps.mercatus.org/2014/07/17/cwps-review-1974-1980/.Google Scholar
House of Representatives Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations (1976). Federal Regulation and Regulatory Reform, October, http://3197d6d14b5f19f2f440-5e13d29c4c016cf96cbbfd197c579b45.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/collection/papers/1970/1976_1001_MossConclusionsT.pdf, 515.Google Scholar
Lenard, Thomas et al. (Council on Wage and Price Stability) (1976), Before the Securities and Exchange Commission: Eligible Securities Dissemination of Quotations, October 6, 3, available at http://cwps.mercatus.org/wp-content/uploads/5-1502.pdf.Google Scholar
Mercatus Center Regulatory Report Card for Commercial Motor Vehicle Hours of Service Proposed Rule (2011). Mercatus Center at George Mason University, http://mercatus.org/reportcards/commercial-motor-vehicle-hours-service.Google Scholar
Mercatus Center Regulatory Report Card for National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead Proposed Rule (2008). Mercatus Center at George Mason University, http://mercatus.org/reportcards/national-ambient-air-quality-standards-lead.Google Scholar
Mercatus Center Regulatory Report Card for Interstate Transport of Nitrogen Oxidesand Sulfur Dioxide Proposed Rule (2010). Mercatus Center at George Mason University, http://mercatus.org/reportcards/interstate-transport-nitrogen-oxides-and-sulfur-dioxide.Google Scholar
Miller, James C. III & Yandle, Bruce(Eds.) (1979). Benefit-cost Analyses of Social Regulation – Case Studies from the Council on Wage and Price Stability. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Morrall, John F. III & Broughel, James W. (2014). The Role of Regulatory Impact Analysis in Federal Rulemaking. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University; http://mercatus.org/publication/role-regulatory-impact-analysis-federal-rulemaking.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc. (2007). v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 494 F.3d 188 (D.C. Cir.).Google Scholar
Pinkston, Elizabeth et al. (Council on Wage and Price Stability), Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, Hours of Service, Comments Before the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Nov. 1978, http://cwps.mercatus.org/wp-content/uploads/110801.pdf.Google Scholar
Pinkston, Elizabeth et al. (Council on Wage and Price Stability) (1980a), Aircraft and Airport Security; Air Carrier Operations, Comments Before the Federal Aviation Administration, http://cwps.mercatus.org/wp-content/uploads/1520012.pdf.Google Scholar
Pinkston, Elizabeth et al. (Council on Wage and Price Stability) (1980b), Prohibition of PCB-Containing Equipment or Machinery and Liquid Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Federally-Inspected Meat Establishments, Poultry Product Establishments and Egg Product Plants, Comments Before the United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Quality Service, December 1980, http://cwps.mercatus.org/wp-content/uploads/180401.pdf.Google Scholar
Regulatory Studies Program of the Mercatus Center, George Mason University (2000). Public Interest Comment on the Security and Exchange Commission’s Concept Release on Regulation of Market Information, Fees and Revenues (prepared by Jerry Ellig andS. Brown-Hruska), Release No. 34-42208, https://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72899/gramm1.htm.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (1976). Eligible Securities Dissemination of Quotations: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 41 Fed. Reg. 32856.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (1977). Dissemination of Quotations for Reported Securities: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 42 Fed. Reg. 32418.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (1978). Dissemination of Quotations for Reported Securities: Final Rule. 43 Fed. Reg. 4342.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (1995). Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk. (p. 76). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip et al. (2005). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. (4th ed) (p. 26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watson, K. William & James, Sallie (2013). Regulatory Protectionism: A Hidden Threat to Free Trade (Policy Analysis No. 723). Washington, DC: Cato Institute; April 9, http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa723.pdf.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hopkins and Stanley supplementary material

Hopkins and Stanley supplementary material 1

Download Hopkins and Stanley supplementary material(File)
File 42.2 KB