Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Consumer’s Guide to Regulatory Impact Analysis: Ten Tips for Being an Informed Policymaker

  • Susan Dudley (a1), Richard Belzer (a2), Glenn Blomquist (a3), Timothy Brennan (a4), Christopher Carrigan (a5), Joseph Cordes (a6), Louis A. Cox (a7), Arthur Fraas (a8), John Graham (a9), George Gray (a10), James Hammitt (a11), Kerry Krutilla (a12), Peter Linquiti (a13), Randall Lutter (a14), Brian Mannix (a15), Stuart Shapiro (a16), Anne Smith (a17), W. Kip Viscusi (a18) and Richard Zerbe (a19)...
Abstract

Regulatory impact analyses (RIAs) weigh the benefits of regulations against the burdens they impose and are invaluable tools for informing decision makers. We offer 10 tips for nonspecialist policymakers and interested stakeholders who will be reading RIAs as consumers.

1.

Core problem: Determine whether the RIA identifies the core problem (compelling public need) the regulation is intended to address.

2.

Alternatives: Look for an objective, policy-neutral evaluation of the relative merits of reasonable alternatives.

3.

Baseline: Check whether the RIA presents a reasonable “counterfactual” against which benefits and costs are measured.

4.

Increments: Evaluate whether totals and averages obscure relevant distinctions and trade-offs.

5.

Uncertainty: Recognize that all estimates involve uncertainty, and ask what effect key assumptions, data, and models have on those estimates.

6.

Transparency: Look for transparency and objectivity of analytical inputs.

7.

Benefits: Examine how projected benefits relate to stated objectives.

8.

Costs: Understand what costs are included.

9.

Distribution: Consider how benefits and costs are distributed.

10.

Symmetrical treatment: Ensure that benefits and costs are presented symmetrically.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Consumer’s Guide to Regulatory Impact Analysis: Ten Tips for Being an Informed Policymaker
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Consumer’s Guide to Regulatory Impact Analysis: Ten Tips for Being an Informed Policymaker
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Consumer’s Guide to Regulatory Impact Analysis: Ten Tips for Being an Informed Policymaker
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
*e-mail: sdudley@gwu.edu
References
Hide All
Arrow, Kenneth J., Cropper, Maureen L., Eads, George C., Hahn, Robert W., Lave, Lester B., Noll, Roger G., Portney, Paul R., Russell, Milton, Schmalensee, Richard, Kerry Smith, V. & Stavins, Robert N. (1996). Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation? Science, 272, 221222. April 12, 1996.
Carrigan, Christopher & Shapiro, Stuart(2016). What’s Wrong with the Back of the Envelope? A Call for Simple (and Timely) Benefit-Cost Analysis. Regulation & Governance. Accessed January 16, 2017. doi:10.1111/rego.12120.
Clinton, William(1993). Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and Amendments. Accessed January 16, 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_regmatters#eo12866.
Cox, Louis Anthony(2016). A Causal Analytics Toolkit (CAT) for Assessing Potential Causal Relations in Data. The George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center. Last modified May 10, 2016. https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/causal-analytics-toolkit-cat-assessing-potential-causal-relations-data.
Cox, Louis Anthony & Popken, Douglas A. (2008). Overcoming Confirmation Bias in Causal Attribution: A Case Study of Antibiotic Resistance Risks. Risk Analysis, 28(5), 11551172. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01122.x.
Dominici, Francesca, Greenstone, Michael & Sunstein, Cass (2014). Science and Regulation. Particulate Matter Matters. Science. April 18, 2014.
Dudley, Susan E. & Gray, George M. (2012). Improving the Use of Science to Inform Environmental Regulation. In Johnston, Jason (Ed.), Institutions and Incentives in Regulatory Science. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Environmental Protection Agency (2000). Guidelines for Preparing Economic Impact Analysis. 240-R-00-003. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/tiff2png.cgi/P1004DN9.PNG?-r+75+-g+7+D%3A%5CZYFILES%5CINDEX%20DATA%5C00THRU05%5CTIFF%5C00001350%5CP1004DN9.TIF.
Fraas, Art & Lutter, Randall (2012). Uncertain Benefits Estimates for Reductions in Fine Particle Concentrations. Risk Analysis, 33(3), 434449. Accessed January 16, 2017. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01883.x.
Fraas, Art, Lutter, Randall, Dudley, Susan E., Gayer, Ted, Graham, John, Shogren, Jason F. & Viscusi, W. Kip (2016). Social Cost of Carbon: Domestic Duty. Science. February 5, 2016. Accessed January 16, 2017. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6273/569.2.
Gayer, Ted & Viscusi, W. Kip (2013). Overriding Consumer Preferences with Energy Regulations. J. Regul. Econ., 43, 248264. Accessed January 16, 2017. doi:10.1007/s11149-013-9210-2.
Graham, John D. (2008). Saving Lives through Administrative Law and Economics. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157(2), 395540.
Gray, G. M. & Cohen, Joshua T. (2012). Rethink Chemical Risk Assessments. Nature, 489, 2728.
Greenstone, Michael (2009). Toward a Culture of Persistent Regulatory Experimentation and Evaluation. In Moss, David & Cisternino, John (Eds.), New Perspectives on Regulation (pp. 111125). Cambridge: The Tobin Project.
Hamilton, James T. & Viscusi, W. Kip (1999). Calculating Risks: The Spatial and Political Dimensions of Hazardous Waste Policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Harrington, Winston, Heinzerling, Lisa & Morgenstern, Richard D.(Eds.) (2009). In Reforming Regulatory Impact Analysis. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Kirkpatrick, Colin & Parker, David(Eds.) (2007). In Regulatory Impact Assessment: Towards Better Regulation? London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Krutilla, Kerry, Good, David H. & Graham, John D. (2015). Uncertainty in the Cost-Effectiveness of Federal Air Quality Regulations. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6(1), 66111. Accessed January 16, 2017. doi:10.1017/bca.2015.7.
Lackey, Robert T. Normative Science. Terra Magazine, 8(2), 36. Accessed January 16, 2017. http://terra.oregonstate.edu/2013/01/normative-science/.
Lutter, Randall (1999). The Role of Economic Analysis in Regulatory Reform. Regulation, 22(2), 3846. Accessed January 16, 2017. https://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv22n2/econanalysis.pdf.
Lutter, Randall & Zorn, David (2016). Reinforcing Reproducibility: What Role for the Federal Government? Regulation, Winter 2015–16, 1516. Accessed January 16, 2017. https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2015/12/regulation-v38n4-8_4.pdf#page=10.
Mannix, Brian (2014). Employment and Human Welfare: Why Does Benefit-Cost Analysis Seem Blind to Job Impacts? In Coglianese, Cary, Finkel, Adam M. & Carrigan, Christopher (Eds.), Does Regulation Kill Jobs? (pp. 190206). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mannix, Brian & Dudley, Susan E. (2015). The Limits of Irrationality as a Rationale for Regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(3), 705712. doi:10.1002/pam.21841. Accessed January 16, 2017. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.21841/full.
Newcomer, Kathryn E., Hatry, Harry P. & Wholey, Joseph S. (2015). In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nichols, A. L. & Zeckhauser, Richard J. (1988). The Perils of Prudence: How Conservative Risk Assessments Distort Regulation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 8(1), 6175. Accessed January 16, 2017. doi:10.1016/0273-2300(88)90007-4.
Obama, Barack(2011). Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review. Accessed January 16, 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_regmatters#eo13563.
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and Office of Science & Technology Policy (OIRA & OSTP) (2007). M-07-24, Updated Principles for Risk Analysis. Susan E. Dudley and Sharon Hays. Last modified September 19, 2007. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/regulatory_matters_pdf/m07-24.pdf.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2002). Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies. Last modified February 22, 2002. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/fedreg/reproducible2.pdf.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2003). Circular A-4, Regulatory Analysis. Last modified September 17, 2003. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/circulars/a004/a-4.pdf.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2010). Agency Checklist: Regulatory Impact Analysis. Last modified October 28, 2010. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/regpol/RIA_Checklist.pdf.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2011a). Circular A-4, Regulatory Impact Analysis: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). Last modified February 7, 2011. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/OMB/circulars/a004/a-4_FAQ.pdf.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2011b). Circular A-4, Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Primer. Last modified August 15, 2011. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/regpol/circular-a-4_regulatory-impact-analysis-a-primer.pdf.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2011c). M-11-10, Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review. Last modified February 2, 2011. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-10.pdf.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2017). Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs.” Last modified April 5, 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2017/M-17-21.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002). Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing; http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264177437-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008). Introductory Handbook for Undertaking Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). Paris: OECD Publishing; https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/44789472.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015). OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing; http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264238770-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016). Regulatory Impact Analysis. Accessed January 16, 2017. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/ria.htm.
Sutherland, W. J., Spiegelhalter, David & Burgman, Mark A. (2013). Twenty Tips for Interpreting Scientific Claims. Nature. November 20, 2013. Accessed January 16, 2017. http://www.nature.com/news/policy-twenty-tips-for-interpreting-scientific-claims-1.14183.
Thaler, Richard H. & Sunstein, Cass R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Trump, Donald J.(2017). Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs. Accessed March 24, 2017. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/02/03/2017-02451/reducing-regulation-and-controlling-regulatory-costs.
Viscusi, W. Kip, Vernon, John M. & Harrington, Joseph E. Jr. (2005). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. (4th ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Zerbe, Richard O., Davis, Tyler, Garland, Nancy & Scott, Tyler (2010). Towards Principles and Standards in the Use of Benefit-Cost Analysis. In MacArthur Foundation Power of Measuring Social Benefits Initiative. Seattle: Benefit-Cost Analysis Center, University of Washington. Accessed January 16, 2017. https://evans.uw.edu/sites/default/files/public/Final-Principles-and%20Standards-Report.pdf.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
  • ISSN: 2194-5888
  • EISSN: 2152-2812
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-benefit-cost-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 518
Total number of PDF views: 1381 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1933 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 27th July 2017 - 18th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.