Skip to main content
×
×
Home

On the Distributional Implications of Safe Drinking Water Standards

  • Dennis C. Cory (a1) and Lester D. Taylor (a2)
Abstract

The provision of safe drinking water provides a dramatic example of the inherent complexity involved in incorporating environmental justice (EJ) considerations into the implementation and enforcement of new environmental standards. To promote substantive EJ, implementation policy must be concerned with the net risk reduction of new and revised regulations. The regulatory concern is that higher water bills for low-income customers of small public water systems may result in less disposable income for other health-related goods and services. In the net, this trade-off may be welfare decreasing, not increasing. Advocates of Health–Health Analysis have argued that the reduction in health-related spending creates a problem for traditional benefit-cost analysis since the long-run health implications of this reduction are not considered. The results of this investigation tend to support this contention. An evaluation of the internal structure of consumption expenditures reveals that low-expenditure households can be expected to react to an increase in the relative price of housing-related goods and services due to a water-rate hike by reducing both housing and health-related expenditures. That is, the representative low-expenditure household re-establishes equilibrium by not only decreasing housing-related spending, but also by decreasing spending on health-related expenditures in a modest but significant way. These results reflect the fact that expenditures on housing are a major proportion of overall household spending, and that accommodating drinking water surcharges exacerbates both health and food security concerns for low-expenditures households.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the Distributional Implications of Safe Drinking Water Standards
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the Distributional Implications of Safe Drinking Water Standards
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the Distributional Implications of Safe Drinking Water Standards
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*e-mail: dcory@ag.arizona.edu
References
Hide All
Bauman, Kurt(1998). Direct measures of poverty as indicators of economic need: evidence from the survey of income and program participation. U.S. Census Bureau Population Division Technical Paper No. 30.
Bauman, Kurt(1999). Extended measures of well-being: meeting basic needs. U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Reports No. P70-67.
Boushey, Heather, Gundersen, Bethney, Brocht, Chauna & Bernstein, Jared (2001). Hardships in America: The Real Story of Working Families. Economic Policy Institute.
Burnett, Jason K. & Hahn, Robert W.(2001). EPA’s Arsenic Rule: The Benefits of Standard Do Not Justify the Costs, AEI-Brookings Joint Center on Regulatory Studies, Regulatory Analysis Paper 01-02.
Cory, Dennis C. & Rahman, Tauhidur (2009). Environmental Justice and Enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act: The Arizona Arsenic Experience. Ecological Economics, 68, 18251837.
Cory, Dennis C., Tauhidur, Rahman, Satheesh, Aradhyula, Melissa, Anne Burns & Miles, H. Kiger (2012). Environmental Justice and Federalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Crawford-Brown, Douglas, Raucher, Robert, Rubin, Scott & Lawson, Megan(2009). Risk Tradeoffs in Public Health When Water Prices Rise: The Implications for Small Community Supplies; Available at http://nrwadev.org/benefits/whitepapers/TOC.htm.
Dalhuisen, Jasper M., Raymond, J. G. M. Florax, de Groot, Henri L. F. & Nijkamp, Peter (2003). Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis. Land Economics, 79 (2), 292308.
Energy CENTS Coalition(1999). Minnesota’s Energy Gap: Unaffordable Energy and Low Income Minnesotans. http://www.energycents.org/index.html.
Espey, Molly, Espey, James & Shaw, W. Douglass (1997). Price Elasticity of Residential Demand for Water: A Meta-Analysis. Water Resources Research, 33 (6 June), 13691374.
Espey, M. J. & Shaw, W. D. (1997). Price Elasticity of Residential Demand for Water: A Meta-analysis. Water Resources Research, 33(6), 13691374.
Gerdtham, Ulf G. & Johannesson, Magnus (2002). Do Life-Saving Regulations Save Lives? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 231249.
Griliches, Zvi (1957). Specification Bias in Estimates of Production Functions. Journal of Farm Economics, 39(1), 820.
Hendricks, David M. (1985). Arizona Soils. Tucson, AZ: College of Agriculture, University of Arizona.
Keeney, Ralph L. (1994). Mortality Risks Induced by the Costs of Regulation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 95110.
Kiger, Miles H. (2007). Environmental federalism and the safe drinking water act: The Arizona Arsenic experience, M.S. thesis. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Koorse, Steven J.(2002) Enforcement Flexibility Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, White Paper prepared for the National Rural Water Association (May), pp. 1–124. Available at http://www.nrwa.org/benefits/whitepapers/conserve/conserve01/conserve01.doc.
Logomasini, Angela (2008). Arsenic. Washington, DC: Competitive Enterprise Institute; Available at http://cei.org/studies-other-studies/arsenic.
Lutter, Randall & Morrall III, John F. (1994). Health–Health Analysis: A New Way to Evaluate Health and Safety Regulation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 4366.
Mishel, Lawrence & Shierholz, Heidi(2013) A Decade of Flat Wages: The Key Barrier to Shared Prosperity and a Rising Middle Class. Briefing Paper #365 (August). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute; Available at http://www.epi.org/publication/a-decade-of-flat-wages-the-key-barrier-to-shared-prosperity-and-a-rising-middle-class/.
National Research Council (1999). Arsenic in Drinking Water. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; Available at http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6444.
Natural Resources Defense Council (2000). Arsenic and Old Laws. New York: Clean Water and Oceans Division; Available at http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/arsenic/aolinx.asp.
Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA) (1992). Air Contaminants Proposed Rule. Federal Register, 57, 26002.
Olmstead, Sheila & Stavins, Robert(2008). Comparing price and non-price approaches to urban water conservation. Harvard Kennedy School, Faculty Research Working Paper RWP08-034.
Portney, Paul R. & Stavins, Robert N. (1994). Regulatory Review of Environmental Policy: The Potential Role of Health–Health Analysis. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8 (1 January), 111122.
Raucher, Robert S., Rubin, Scott J., Crawford-Brown, Douglas & Lawson, Megan M. (2011). Benefit-Cost Analysis for Drinking Water Standards: Efficiency, Equity and Affordability Considerations in Small Communities. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2 (1), 122 Available at http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jbca.2011.2.1/jbca.2011.2.1.1004/jbca.2011.2.1.1004.xml.
Regnier, John E. (2002). Flexibility in the SAFE Drinking Water Act. Rural Water, Fourth Quarter, 1314.
Rubin, Scott J. & Raucher, Robert(2010). Applying Environmental Justice to Drinking Water Regulations; Available at http://mail.nrwadev.org/benefits/whitepapers/TOC.htm.
Rubin, Scott J., Raucher, Robert & Lawson, Megan2008 The Relationship Between Household Financial Distress and Health: Implications for Drinking Water Regulation. White Paper for the National Rural Water Association. pp. 1–19; Available at http://www.denix.osd.mil/cmrmd/upload/NRWAPAPER.pdf.
Scheberle, Denise (2004). Implementing Drinking Water Regulations in a One-Size-Fits-All World. In Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Policies of Implementation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. (1996). Health–Health Tradeoffs. University of Chicago Law Review, 63, 15331573.
Sunstein, Cass R.(2001). The Arithmetic of Arsenic, University of Chicago Institute for Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 135; Available at http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics_wp/.
Taylor, Lester D. (2013). The Internal Structure of U.S. Consumption Expenditures. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing Co.
Taylor, Lester D.(2016). Notes on Measurement of Consumer Expenditures (With Special Reference to the On-Going BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey). Department of Economics, University of Arizona. Available from .
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000). Arsenic in Drinking Water Rule Economic Analysis. Washington, DC: Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water, EPA 815-R-00-026; Available at http://nepis.epa.gov/exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20001YQT.txt.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Sources of Technical and Financial Assistance for Small Drinking Water Systems. Washington, DC: Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water, EPA 816-K-02-005; Available at http://yosemite.epa.gov/water/owrccatalog.nsf/EPATitle?OpenView&CartID=13452-051242.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003). Environmental Justice; Available at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/environmentaljustice/index.html.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2006). Arsenic in Drinking Water, Basic Information. Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water Web Resources; Available at http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/arsenic/basic-information.cfm.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011). Drinking Water and Ground Water Statistics. Office of Water (4606 m), EPA 816-R-13-003 (March); Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/databases/drink/sdwisfed/upload.epa816r13003.pdf.
Vandervoet, Kathleen (2008). Water Rates May Rise 72.7 Percent. Tubac Villager, IV (2 December), 12.
Vandervoet, Kathleen (2009). 120 Attend Water Rate Hearing. Tubac Villager, IV (6 April), 10.
Wilson, Richard (2001). Underestimating Arsenic’s Risk. Regulation, 24 (3), 5052.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
  • ISSN: 2194-5888
  • EISSN: 2152-2812
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-benefit-cost-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 126 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 671 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th March 2017 - 21st June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.