Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Retrospective Analysis of U.S. Federal Environmental Regulation

  • Richard Morgenstern (a1)
Abstract

Retrospective, or ex post, analysis of U.S. federal regulation aims to rigorously document regulatory outcomes using cost, benefit, and distributional metrics. This paper presents nine new case studies involving a total of 34 comparisons of ex ante and ex post estimates from a diverse group of environmentally oriented rules. Despite the potential for selection bias and other limitations of the case study approach, the results suggest a slight tendency to overestimate both costs and benefits (or effectiveness) of regulation. This paper considers various analytic issues relevant to developing credible baselines for comparison, and offers policy lessons regarding the design of emissions trading programs along with approaches for incorporating uncertainty into both preregulatory studies and policy designs. Recommendations to facilitate and support future retrospective analyses are also presented.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Retrospective Analysis of U.S. Federal Environmental Regulation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Retrospective Analysis of U.S. Federal Environmental Regulation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Retrospective Analysis of U.S. Federal Environmental Regulation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Administrative Conference of the United States(2014). Retrospective Review of Agency Rules. Recommendation number 2014–5, adopted December 4, 2014, published December 9, 2014. https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/retrospective-review-agency-rules.
Aldy, Joseph E.(2014). Learning from Experience: An Assessment of the Retrospective Reviews of Agency Rules & the Evidence for Improving the Design & Implementation of Regulatory Policy. Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States.http://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Aldy%20Retro%20Review%20Draft%2011-17-2014.pdf.
Bridgeland, John & Peter, Orszag (2013). Can Government Play Moneyball? The Atlantic, June 19. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/07/can government-play-moneyball/309389/.
Chan, H. Ron, Chupp, B. Andrew, Cropper, Maureen L. & Muller, Nicholas Z.(2017). The Impact of Trading on the Costs and Benefits of the Acid Rain Program. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15–25 REV. Washington, DC.
Cropper, Maureen, Fraas, Arthur & Morgenstern, Richard D. (2017). Looking Backward to Move Regulations Forward. Science, 355(6332), 13751376.
Dale, Larry, Camille, Antinori, Michael, McNeil, McMahon, James E. & Fujita, K. Sydney (2009). Retrospective Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends. Energy Policy, 37, 597605.
Deschenes, Oliver, Greenstone, Michael & Shapiro, Joseph(2016). Defensive investments & the demand for air quality: evidence from the NOx budget program. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. NBER Working Paper No. w1826.7.
Elrod, Aaron A. & Malik, Arun S. (2017). The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Plant-Level Product Mix. Journal of Environmental Management, 83, 164184.
Fowlie, Meredith & Perloff, Jeffrey (2013). Distributing pollution rights in cap-and-trade programs in the United States Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 16401652.
Fraas, Arthur G. & Egorenkov, Alexander(forthcoming). Retrospective Analyses Are Hard: A Cautionary Tale from EPA’s Air Toxics Regulations. Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis.
Gray, Wayne B. & Shadbegian, Ronald (2015). Multimedia Pollution Regulation and Environmental Performance: EPA’s Cluster Rule. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15–26. Washington, DC.
Greenstone, Michael (2009). Toward a Culture of Persistent Regulatory Experimentation and Evaluation. In David, Moss & John, Cisternino (Eds.), New Perspectives on Regulation (pp. 111126). Cambridge, MA: The Tobin Project.
Hahn, Robert W. & Tetlock, Paul C. (2008). Has Economic Analysis Improved Regulatory Decisions? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 6784 (Winter).
Harrington, Winston(2006). Grading Estimates of the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulation. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 06–39. Washington, DC.
Harrington, Winston & Malinovskaya, Anna (2015). Expected vs. Actual Outcomes of Environmental Policies: The Clean Water State Revolving Fund. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper. Washington, DC.
Harrington, Winston, Morgenstern, Richard & Nelson, Peter (2000). On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2), 297322.
Harrington, Winston, Morgenstern, Richard, Shih, Jhih-Shyang & Bell, Michelle (2012). Did the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Really Improve Air Quality? Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 5(4), 353367.
Institute of Policy Integrity (2016). Strengthening Regulatory Review: Recommendations for the Trump Administration from Former OIRA Leaders. New York: New York University; http://policyintegrity.org/publications/detail/strengthening-regulatory-review.
Kopits, Elizabeth, McGartland, Al, Morgan, Cynthia, Pasurka, Carl, Shadbegian, Ron, Simon, Nathalie B., Simpson, David & Wolverton, Ann (2014). Retrospective Cost Analyses of EPA Regulations: A Case Study Approach. Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis, 5(2), 173192.
Lade, Gabriel E., Cynthia Lin, C.-Y. & Smith, Aaron(2015). Ex Post Costs and Renewable Identification Number (RIN) Prices under the Renewable Fuel Standard. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15–22. Washington, DC.
Lutter, Randall(2012). The role of retrospective analysis and review in regulatory policy. Mercatus Center Working Paper 12–14. Arlington, VA: George Mason University.
Lutter, Randall(2015). How Effective Are Federal Food Safety Regulations? The Case of Eggs and Salmonella Enteritidis. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15–24. Washington, DC.
Nelson, Erik J., Withey, John C., Pennington, Derric & Lawler, Joshua J. (2017). Identifying the Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation on Land Cover Change. Resource and Energy Economics, 47, 89126.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2006). Validating Regulatory Analysis: 2005 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations and Unfunded Mandates on State, Local, and Tribal Entities. Washington, DC: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
Seong, Si Kyung & Mendeloff, John (2004). Assessing the Accuracy of OSHA’s Projections of the Benefits of New Safety Standards. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 45(4), 313328.
Simpson, David (2014). Do Regulators Overestimate the Costs of Regulation? Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis, 5(2), 315332.
Sunstein, Cass(2011a). Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments & Agencies: Facilitating Scientific Research by Streamlining the Paperwork Reduction Act Process. M-11-07. December 9, 2010. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-07.pdf.
Sunstein, Cass(2011b). Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments & Agencies: Retrospective Analysis of Existing Significant Regulations. M-11-19. April 25, 2011.https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-19.pdf.
Taylor, Margaret, Spurlock, C. Anna & Yang, Hung-Chia(2015). Confronting Regulatory Cost and Quality Expectations: An Exploration of Technical Change in Minimum Efficiency Performance Standards. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15–50. Washington, DC.
Thompson, Kimberly M., Sequi-Gomez, Maria & Graham, John D. (2002). Valuing Benefit and Cost Estimates: The Case of Airbag Regulation. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 803811.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
  • ISSN: 2194-5888
  • EISSN: 2152-2812
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-benefit-cost-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed