Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-97xxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T22:46:03.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scitovsky reversals in benefit-cost analysis with normal goods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Richard E. Just ,
Andrew Schmitz  and
Richard O. Zerbe
Richard E. Just
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, 1130A McCarty Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Andrew Schmitz
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Agricultural and Resource Economics, College Park, MD, USA
Richard O. Zerbe*
Affiliation:
The Evans School, University of Washington, Box 353 055, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
*
Richard O. Zerbe, The Evans School, University of Washington, Box 353 055, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, Tel.: 2066165470, e-mail: zerbe@uw.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , 01 December 2013 , pp. 411 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2013

References

Hicks, J. (1940). The valuation of social income. Economica, 7(26), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, R. E., Schmitz, A., & Zerbe, R. O. Jr. (2012). Scitovsky reversals and practical benefit-cost analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 3, Article 3 (10 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare propositions and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Economic Journal 49(145), 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, A., & Zerbe, R. O. Jr. (2008). Applied benefit-cost analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scitovsky, T. (1941). A note on welfare propositions in economics. Review of Economic Studies 9, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar