Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The value of a statistical life: some clarifications and puzzles

  • Cass R. Sunstein (a1)
Abstract

Many people have wondered why the US government conducts cost-benefit analysis with close reference to the value of a statistical life (VSL). It is helpful to answer that question by reference to the “Easy Cases,” in which those who benefit from regulatory protection must pay for it. In such cases, WTP is usually the right foundation for VSL, because beneficiaries are hardly helped by being forced to pay for regulatory protection that they believe not to be in their interests. In the Easy Cases, arguments from both welfare and autonomy support the use of WTP and VSL (with potentially important qualifications involving imperfect information and behavioral market failures). The analysis is less straightforward in harder cases, in which beneficiaries do not pay for all of the cost of what they receive (and may pay little of that cost). In such cases, arguments from welfare and autonomy might not lead in any clear direction. In the harder cases, regulation might be justified on welfare grounds even if the cost-benefit analysis (based on VSL) suggests that it is not. In principle, a direct inquiry into welfare (the master concept) would be preferable to use of cost-benefit analysis. In the harder cases, distributional considerations might also count in favor of proceeding (as prioritarianism suggests). But at the current time, direct inquiries into welfare consequences and into distributional effects are challenging in practice, and hence regulators should generally rely on cost-benefit analysis, making welfarist adjustments, or adjustments based on distributional considerations, only in compelling cases.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The value of a statistical life: some clarifications and puzzles
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The value of a statistical life: some clarifications and puzzles
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The value of a statistical life: some clarifications and puzzles
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Cass R. Sunstein, Harvard Law School, Areeda Hall 225, 1563 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USAcsunstei@law.harvard.edu
References
Hide All
Adler, M. D. (2008). Risk equity: a new proposal. Harvard Environmental Law Review 32, 1. Available at: Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=981003 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.981003.
Adler, M. D (2011). Well-being and fair distribution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Adler, M. D. (2013). Happiness surveys and public policy: what’s the use? Duke Law Journal 62, 15091601.
Adler, M., & Posner, E. (1999). Implementing cost-benefit analysis when preferences are distorted. U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper, (88).
Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (2006). New foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1984). The economic consequences of cognitive dissoncance. In: Ackerlof, G. A. (Ed.) An economic theorist′s book of tales. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Aldy, J., & Viscusi, K. W. (2007). Age differences in the value of statistical life. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(2), 241260.
Arneson, R. J. (2000). Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism. Ethics 110(2), 339349.
Ashenfelter, O., & Greenstone, M. (2002). Using mandated speed limits to measure the value of a statistical life. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w9094.
Benjamin, D. J., Kimball, M. S., Heffetz, O., & Rees-Jones, A. (2012). What do you think would make you happier? What do you think you would choose? The American Economic Review 102(5), 2083.
Bronsteen, J., Buccafusco, C., & Masur, Jonathan S. (2013). Well-being analysis versus cost-benefit analysis. Duke Law Journal 62, 16031689.
Conly, S. (2012). Against autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cropper, M., Hammitt, J., & Robinson, L. (2011). Valuing mortality risk reductions: progress and challenges. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3, 313336.
Department of Transportation. (DOT). (2013). Available at: http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/DOT%202013%20Signed%20VSL%20Memo.pdf.
de Tocqueville, A. D. (1848). 1969, Democracy in America Trans. by Lawrence, George. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4), 4564.
Dorman, P. (1996). Markets and mortality. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Dorman, P., & Hagstrom, P. (1998). Wage compensation for dangerous work revisited. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 52, 116135.
Dunn, E., & Norton, M. (2013). Happy money. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dworkin, R. (2002). Sovereign virtue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Elster, J. (1985). Sour grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J., & Roemer, J. E. (Eds.). (1993). Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2000). Agency Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0228C-07.pdf/$file/EE-0228C-07.pdf.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010). Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions for Environmental Policy: A White Paper (Review Draft). Prepared by the National Center for Environmental Economics for consultation with the Science Advisory Board – Environmental Economics Advisory Committee.
Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting. In: Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Graham, C. (2013). An economist’s perspective on well-being analysis and cost-benefit analysis. Duke Law Journal 62, 16911700.
Hedbegian, R. J., Gray, W., & Morgan, C. (2007). Benefits and costs from sulfur dioxide trading: a distributional analysis. In: Visgilio, G. R. and Whitelaw, D. M. (Eds.), Acid in the environment: lessons learned and future prospects. New York, New York: Springer.
Hicks, J. R. (1941). The rehabilitation of consumers’ surplus. The Review of Economic Studies 8(2), 108116.
Jones-Lee, M. W. (1991). Altruism and the value of other people’s safety. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4(2), 213219.
Jones-Lee, M. W. (1992). Paternalistic altruism and the value of statistical life. The Economic Journal 102(410), 8090.
Kahn, M. (2001). The beneficiaries of clean air act regulation. Regulation, 24, 3438.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review 93(5), 14491475.
Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. (1991). Notes on the psychology of utility. In: Elster, J. and Roemer, J. (Eds.), Interpersonal comparisons of utility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375406.
Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (1994). Why the legal system is less efficient than the income tax in redistributing wealth. Journal of Legal Studies 23, 667681.
Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., & McCafferty, J. (2004). The economics of meaning. Nordic Journal of Political Economy 30(1), 6175.
Khader, S. J. (2011). Adaptive preferences and women′s empowerment. OUP USA.
Kling, C. L. & Swackhamer, D. L. (2011). Review of ‘Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions for Environmental Policy: A White Paper’ (December 10, 2010). Memorandum to Lisa P. Jackson, EPA Administrator, from the EPA Science Advisory Board and Environmental Economics Advisory Committee. EPA-SAB-11-011.
Kniesner, T. J., Viscusi, K. W. & Ziliak, J. P. (2012). Willingness to accept equals willingness to pay for labor market estimates of the value of statistical life. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2221038.
Korobkin, R. (2003). The endowment effect and legal analysis. Northwestern University Law Review 97(3), 12271293.
Leung, J., & Guna, J. (2006). Value of statistical life: adults versus children, Accid Anal. Prev. 38(6), 12081217.
Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., Braathen, N. A., & Biausque, V.. (2011). Valuing mortality risk reductions from environmental, transport, and health policies: a global meta-analysis of stated preference studies. Risk Analysis 31(9), 13811407.
Livermore, M. A., & Rosenberg, J. S. (2013). The shape of distributional analysis. The Globalization of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Environmental Policy 5, 6984.
Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. (Casey, Kathy ed., 2002). New York: Dover.
Miller, T. R. (2000). Variations between countries in value of a statistical life. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 34, 169188.
Posner, E. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Dollars and death. The University of Chicago Law Review 537598.
Robinson, L. A., & Hammitt, J. K. (2011). Valuing health and longevity in regulatory analysis: current issues and challenges, In: The Handbook on the Politics of Regulation Levi-Faur, D. (Ed.), Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar. Available at www.regulatory-analysis.com.
Robinson, L. A., & Hammitt, J. K.. (2013). Skills of the trade: valuing health risk reductions in benefit-cost analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 4(1), 107130.
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sharot, T. (2010). The optimism bias. New York: Random House.
Shavell, S. (1981). A note of efficiency vs. distributional equity in legal rulemaking: should distributional equity matter given optimal income taxation? The American Economic Review 71(2), 414418.
Sunstein, C. R. (2002a). Risk and reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2002b). Probability neglect. The Yale Law Journal 112(1), 61107.
Sunstein, C. R. (2013a). The storrs lectures: behavioral economics and paternalism. Yale Law Journal, 113, Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2182619orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2182619.
Sunstein, C. R. (2013b). Simpler. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). The real world of cost-benefit analysis. Colum L Rev (forthcoming 2014).
Thaler, R., & Rosen, S. (1976). The value of saving a life. Available at http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3964.pdf.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ubel, P. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Pain and suffering awards: they shouldn’t be (just) about pain and suffering. The Journal of Legal Studies 37(S2), S195S216.
Viscusi, K. W. (1992). Fatal tradeoffs. New York: Oxford University Press.
Viscusi, W. (2010). The heterogeneity of the value of statistical life. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 40(1), 113.
Viscusi, K. W., & Aldy, J. (2003). The value of a statistical life. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1), 576.
Viscusi, K. W. (2013). The benefits of mortality risk reduction. The Duke Law Journal 62, 17351745.
Weisbach, D. A. (2003). Should legal rules be used to redistribute income? The University of Chicago Law Review 70(1), 439453.
Williams, S. H. (2013). Statistical children. Yale Journal of Regulation 30, 63125.
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In: Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
  • ISSN: 2194-5888
  • EISSN: 2152-2812
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-benefit-cost-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 99 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 93 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.