Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:56:34.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DISTINGUISHING THE IMPACT OF POSTPONEMENT, SPACING AND STOPPING ON BIRTH INTERVALS: EVIDENCE FROM A MODEL WITH HETEROGENEOUS FECUNDITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2012

IAN M. TIMÆUS  and
TOM A. MOULTRIE
IAN M. TIMÆUS
Affiliation:
Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
TOM A. MOULTRIE
Affiliation:
Centre for Actuarial Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper investigates the impact on birth intervals of three distinct birth control strategies: stopping childbearing, spacing births and the postponement of further childbearing for reasons unrelated to women's family-building histories. A macro-simulation model of the family-building process is described that incorporates heterogeneity in fecundability. This model is used to demonstrate that the postponement of further childbearing has a distinctive impact on schedules of duration-specific fertility rates that differs from that of both family-size limitation and birth spacing. In particular, the simulation results, supplemented by an analytical exposition, show that reductions in fertility due to spacing are a function of interval duration and its log, while reductions due to postponement are a function of interval duration and its square. This provides a way to test statistically for the presence of, and distinguish between, differential postponement and spacing in regression analyses of birth history data.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 311 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderton, D. L. & Bean, L. L. (1985) Birth spacing and fertility limitation: a behavioral analysis of a nineteenth century frontier population. Demography 22(2), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bengtsson, T. & Dribe, M. (2006) Deliberate control in a natural fertility population: Southern Sweden, 1766–1864. Demography 43(4), 727–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrington, A. (2004) Perpetual postponers? Women's, men's and couple's fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends 117, 9–19.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, C., Banja, F. & Hill, A. G. (1998) Reproductive mishaps and Western contraception: an African challenge to fertility theory. Population and Development Review 24(1), 15–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaarts, J. (1977) A dynamic model of the reproductive process. Population Studies 31(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, W. (1958) The distribution of births in human populations. Population Studies 12(1), 51–72.Google Scholar
Brass, W. & Juarez, F. (1983) Censored cohort parity progression ratios from birth histories. Asian and Pacific Census Forum 10(1), 5–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Breton, D., Prioux, F. & Dutreuilh, C. (2005) Two children or three?: influence of family policy and sociodemographic factors. Population (English Edition) 60(4), 415–445.Google Scholar
Coale, A. J. & Trussell, T. J. (1974) Model fertility schedules: variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations. Population Index 40(2), 185–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Cooman, E., Ermisch, J. & Joshi, H. (1987) The next birth and the labour market: a dynamic model of births in England and Wales. Population Studies 41(2), 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dribe, M. & Scalone, F. (2010) Detecting deliberate fertility control in pre-transitional populations: evidence from six German villages, 1766–1863. European Journal of Population 26(4), 411–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, D., Eisenbach, Z. & Goldscheider, C. (1980) Family-size limitation and birth spacing: the fertility transition of African and Asian immigrants in Israel. Population and Development Review 6(4), 581–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Hanks, J. (2007) Natural intentions: fertility decline in the African Demographic and Health Surveys. American Journal of Sociology 112(4), 1008–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, L. (1961) Some data on natural fertility. Eugenics Quarterly 8(2), 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurt, L. S., Ronsmans, C. & Thorne, S. L. (2006) The effect of births on women's mortality: systematic review of the evidence for women who have completed childbearing. Population Studies 60(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, U. (2009) Infertility in sub-Saharan Africa. In Gourbin, C. (ed.) Santé de la reproduction au Nord et au Sud: de connaisance à l'action. Presses universitaires de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, pp. 243–256.Google Scholar
Lightbourne, R. E. (1985) Individual preferences and fertility behaviour. In Cleland, J. & Hobcraft, J. (eds) Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar
Menken, J., Duffy, L. & Kuhn, R. (2003) Childbearing and women's survival: new evidence from Bangladesh. Population and Development Review 29(3), 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moultrie, T. A. & Timæus, I. M. (2003) The South African fertility decline: evidence from two censuses and a Demographic and Health Survey. Population Studies 57(3), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moultrie, T. A., Sayi, T. S. & Timæus, I. M. (2012) Birth intervals, postponement and fertility decline in Africa: a new kind of transition? Population Studies DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2012.701660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okun, B. S. (1995) Distinguishing stopping behavior from spacing behavior with indirect methods. Historical Methods 28(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santow, G. (1995) Coitus interruptus and the control of natural fertility. Population Studies 49(1), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timæus, I. M. & Moultrie, T. A. (2008) On postponement and birth intervals. Population and Development Review 34(3), 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bavel, J. (2004) Deliberate birth spacing before the fertility transition in Europe: evidence from nineteenth-century Belgium. Population Studies 58(1), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Bavel, J. & Kok, J. (2004) Birth spacing in the Netherlands. The effects of family composition, occupation and religion on birth intervals, 1820–1885. European Journal of Population 20(2), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, H. (1976) Motivations for the use of birth control: evidence from West Africa. Demography 13(4), 479–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C. F. & Bankole, A. (2000) Trends in the demand for family limitation in developing countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 26(2), 56–62 & 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar