Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:15:14.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GETTING READY FOR THE MARRIAGE MARKET? FURTHER COMMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2012

PETTER LUNDBORG ,
PAUL NYSTEDT  and
BJÖRN LINDGREN
PETTER LUNDBORG
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Lund University, Sweden
PAUL NYSTEDT
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Linköping University, Sweden
BJÖRN LINDGREN
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Sweden National Bureau of Economic Research, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Debate
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 251 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Lundborg, P., Nystedt, P. & Lindgren, B. (2007) Getting ready for the marriage market? The association between divorce risks and investments in attractive body mass among married Europeans. Journal of Biosocial Science 39, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundborg, P., Nystedt, P. & Lindgren, B. (2012) Getting ready for the marriage market? A response. Journal of Biosocial Science 44, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. & Grimps, F. (2012) Getting ready for the marriage market? A comment. Journal of Biosocial Science 44, 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimps, F. & Schneider, B. (2012) Getting ready for the marriage market? A rejoinder. Journal of Biosocial Science 44, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar