Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:46:02.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is not an independent risk factor for breech presentation among singleton term births in Vienna, Austria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2024

L. Bartsch
Affiliation:
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
M. Hämmerle
Affiliation:
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
S. Putschögl
Affiliation:
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
B. Hartmann
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinic Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
S. Kirchengast*
Affiliation:
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
*
Corresponding author: Sylvia Kirchengast; Email: sylvia.kirchengast@univie.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are still discussed critically, as there is no consensus on whether these treatments could be the cause of risk factors for obstetric problems such as breech presentation. The aim of this study was to test the association between ART and breech presentation among 11920 singleton term births taking place in Vienna from 2010 to 2020. In this single-centre medical record-based study, data concerning the conception mode (spontaneous versus IVF or ICSI), child presentation, birth mode, newborn sex and size as well as age, height, weight, and reproductive history of the mother were included. Three hundred twenty-six newborns (2.7%) were conceived by IVF or ICSI, and 527 newborns (4.4%) were delivered in breech presentation. Breech presentation occurred in 7.6% of IVF/ICSI children but only in 4.3% of spontaneously conceived children (P = 0.019). ART increased the crude risk of breech presentation significantly (OR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.71 – 2.38). After adjusting for maternal age, height, number of previous births, smoking, and newborn sex, however, ART had no longer a significant impact on the risk of breech presentation. In contrast, breech presentation was significantly associated with higher maternal age as well as a lower number of previous births, but not with ART. This study shows that the adverse outcomes of IVF and ICSI pregnancies may not be due to the ART treatment alone but might also be due to the mostly higher age and lower parity of the mothers using ART.

Type
Short Report
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Louisa Brown, the first child conceived in vitro, was born 45 years ago. At that time, a successful in vitro fertilisation (IVF) was a sensation, now assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), such as IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), are established methods in the treatment of infertility and helped millions of involuntarily childless couples (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Hwu, Chen, Hou and Cheng2020; Wyns et al., Reference Wyns, de Geyter, Calhaz-Jorge, Kupka, Motrenko, Smeenk, Bergh, Tandler-Schneider, Rugescu, Vidakovic and Goossens2017). Nevertheless, this technique is still discussed as a risk factor for preterm birth, foetal growth restriction, and several obstetric problems (Berntsen et al Reference Berntsen, Söderström-Anttila, Wennerholm, Laivuori, Loft, Oldereid, Romundstad, Bergh and Pinborg2019; Helmerhorst et al., Reference Helmerhorst, Perquin, Donker and Keirse2004; Koudstaal et al., Reference Koudstaal, Braat, Bruinse, Naaktgeboren, Vermeiden and Visser2000; Malchau et al., Reference Malchau, Loft, Henningsen, Nyboe Andersen and Pinborg2014; Pandey et al., Reference Pandey, Shetty, Hamilton, Bhattacharya and Maheshwari2012; Zadori et al., Reference Zádori, Kozinszky, Orvos, Katona, Pál and Kovács2003). It is still unclear whether these problems are directly related to ART use (Romundstad et al., Reference Romundstad, Romundstad, Sunde, von Düring, Skjaerven, Gunnell and Vatten2008; Stern et al., Reference Stern, Luke, Tobias, Gopal, Hornstein and Diop2015; Valenzuela-Alcaraz et al., Reference Valenzuela-Alcaraz, Crispi, Manau, Cruz-Lemini, Borras, Balasch and Gratacós2016), because these adverse effects are mainly associated with multiple pregnancies, which are more common after ART treatment. A typical obstetric problem associated with ART is breech presentation (Noli et al., Reference Noli, Baini, Parazzini, Mauri, Vignali, Gerli, Favilli and Cipriani2019; Romundstad et al., Reference Romundstad, Romundstad, Sunde, von Düring, Skjærven and Vatten2009; Schieve et al., Reference Schieve, Cohen, Nannini, Ferre, Reynolds, Zhang, Jeng, Macaluso and Wright2007; Slavov, Reference Slavov2021). Two recently published studies characterised by huge sample sizes (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Hunt, Palmer, Bull and Callander2023; Londero et al., Reference Londero, Massarotti, Xholli, Fruscalzo and Cagnacci2023) revealed a significant association between ART and breech presentation. In previous studies, however, it was discussed whether ART is truly an independent risk factor for breech presentation or whether factors such as older maternal age, nulliparity, or preterm birth, which are typical of ART pregnancies, might increase the risk for breech presentation independent of ART (Romundstad et al., Reference Romundstad, Romundstad, Sunde, von Düring, Skjærven and Vatten2009). Therefore, we tested the hypothesis: ART is not an independent risk factor for the increased prevalence of breech presentation among singleton term births, but ART-associated factors such as higher maternal age, nulliparity, and gestational week increase the risk of breech presentation.

In this single-centre and medical record-based study, we analysed the association patterns between the mode of conception and child presentation among 11920 singleton term births (>37 weeks of gestation) taking place between 2010 and 2020 at the Donaustadt Clinic in Vienna, Austria. We hypothesise that child presentation among singleton term births is not associated with the conception mode.

Our dataset included information regarding the conception mode (spontaneous or assisted (IVF or ICSI)), maternal age, height, prepregnancy weight status, gestational weight gain, smoking, number of previous births, caesarean section, and newborn sex and size (birth weight, birth length, and head circumference). Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 27.0. (IBM, Austria). To test group differences, t-tests were computed. For categorical variables, χ2 tests were applied. To evaluate the association of child presentation and conception mode, logistic regression was performed.

Three hundred twenty-six mothers (2.7%) conceived via either ICSI or IVF. Five hundred twenty-seven children (4.4%) were delivered in breech presentation. Table 1 demonstrates significant differences between ART and spontaneously conceived pregnancies. Mothers pregnant via ART were significantly older, taller, and heavier before pregnancy. Spontaneously conceiving mothers had experienced significantly more births and were more likely to be smokers. ART was significantly positively associated with a shorter pregnancy, although only term births have been included, an increased cesarean section rate, and more female offspring. No significant differences in newborn size apart from head circumference could be observed. ART increased the crude risk of breech presentation significantly (OR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.71 – 2.38). At first glimpse, these results plead for an independent positive association between ART and breech presentation. After adjusting for maternal age, height, parity, smoking, newborn weight, gestational week, and newborn sex, ART had no longer a significant impact on the risk of breech presentation. The logistic regression indicates a significantly positive association between breech presentation and maternal age, maternal height, birthweight, gestational week as well as the number of previous births, but not with ART (Table 2). Consequently, our hypothesis was corroborated by our results. Our results partly follow those of several other studies (Berntsen et al., Reference Berntsen, Söderström-Anttila, Wennerholm, Laivuori, Loft, Oldereid, Romundstad, Bergh and Pinborg2019; Helmerhorst et al., Reference Helmerhorst, Perquin, Donker and Keirse2004; Koudstaal et al., Reference Koudstaal, Braat, Bruinse, Naaktgeboren, Vermeiden and Visser2000; Malchau et al., Reference Malchau, Loft, Henningsen, Nyboe Andersen and Pinborg2014; Pandey et al., Reference Pandey, Shetty, Hamilton, Bhattacharya and Maheshwari2012; Slavov, Reference Slavov2021; Wyns et al., Reference Wyns, de Geyter, Calhaz-Jorge, Kupka, Motrenko, Smeenk, Bergh, Tandler-Schneider, Rugescu, Vidakovic and Goossens2017; Zadori et al., Reference Zádori, Kozinszky, Orvos, Katona, Pál and Kovács2003) but contrast with the recently published studies by Chen et al. (Reference Chen, Hunt, Palmer, Bull and Callander2023) and Londero et al. (Reference Londero, Massarotti, Xholli, Fruscalzo and Cagnacci2023). In our study, the increased rates of breech presentation in ART-conceived newborns cannot solely be explained by ART treatment itself. While older maternal age increased the risk of breech presentation significantly, a higher number of previous births (OR = 0.84) and a higher gestational week – even among term births – (OR = 0.60) led to the greatest decrease in the risk of breech presentation.

Table 1. Maternal and Newborn Characteristics among Term Births According to Conception (Spontaneous versus Assisted Conception)

To test group differences, t-tests were computed. For categorical variables, χ2 tests were applied.

We are aware that our sample size is tiny in comparison with those of Chen et al. (Reference Chen, Hunt, Palmer, Bull and Callander2023) and Londero et al. (Reference Londero, Massarotti, Xholli, Fruscalzo and Cagnacci2023), and that this fact is a major limitation of our study. Nevertheless, we could verify our hypothesis. For our sample, the higher rates of breech presentation among IVF and ICSI pregnancies may not be due to the ART treatment alone but might be due to the mostly higher maternal age, the lower parity, and shorter pregnancy among women suffering from infertility (Table 2).

Table 2. The Associations Between Birth Presentation and Maternal as well as Newborn Parameters among Singleton Term Births

Logistic regression analysis.

Funding statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial entity, or not-for-profit organisation.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical standard

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Vienna (responsible for Public Hospitals) (Protocol number: EK 19-274-VK 18 March 2020).

References

Berntsen, S, Söderström-Anttila, V, Wennerholm, UB, Laivuori, H, Loft, A, Oldereid, NB, Romundstad, LB, Bergh, C and Pinborg, A (2019) The health of children conceived by ART: “The chicken or the egg?” Human Reproduction Update 25(2), 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, HY, Hwu, WL, Chen, CH, Hou, CY and Cheng, W (2020) Children conceived by assisted reproductive technology prone to low birth weight, preterm birth, and birth defects: a cohort review of more than 50,000 live births during 2011–2017 in Taiwan. Frontiers in Pediatrics 8, 87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, AX, Hunt, RW, Palmer, KR, Bull, CF and Callander, EJ (2023) The impact of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation induction on breech presentation: a whole of population-based cohort study. Australian New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 63, 434440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helmerhorst, FM, Perquin, DAM, Donker, D and Keirse, MJNC (2004) Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. British Medical Journal 328, 261264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koudstaal, J, Braat, DDM, Bruinse, HW, Naaktgeboren, N, Vermeiden, JPW and Visser, GHA (2000) Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals IVF group, and in half of them an increased incidence of. Human Reproduction 15, 18191825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londero, AP, Massarotti, C, Xholli, A, Fruscalzo, A and Cagnacci, A (2023) Assisted reproductive technology and breech delivery: a nationwide cohort study in singleton pregnancies. Journal of Personalized Medicine 13, 1144. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071144 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malchau, SS, Loft, A, Henningsen, AK, Nyboe Andersen, A and Pinborg, A (2014) Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: the influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertility and Sterility 102, 11101116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noli, SA, Baini, I, Parazzini, F, Mauri, PA, Vignali, M, Gerli, S, Favilli, A and Cipriani, S (2019) Preterm birth, low gestational age, low birth weight, parity, and other determinants of breech presentation: results from a large retrospective population-based study. BioMed Research International 2019, 9581439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, S, Shetty, A, Hamilton, M, Bhattacharya, S and Maheshwari, A (2012) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 18, 485503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, von Düring, V, Skjaerven, R, Gunnell, D and Vatten, LJ (2008) Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilization: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 372(9640), 737743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, von Düring, V, Skjærven, R and Vatten, LJ (2009) Assisted fertilization and breech delivery: risks and obstetric management. Human Reproduction 24, 32053210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schieve, LA, Cohen, B, Nannini, A, Ferre, C, Reynolds, MA, Zhang, Z, Jeng, G, Macaluso, M, Wright, VC and the Massachusetts Consortium for Assisted Reproductive Technology Epidemiologic Research (MCARTER) (2007) A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Maternal and Child Health Journal 11, 517525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slavov, SS (2021) Malpresentation of the fetus in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 9(B), 573576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, JE, Luke, B, Tobias, M, Gopal, D, Hornstein, MD and Diop, H (2015) Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertility and Sterility 103, 14381445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B, Crispi, F, Manau, D, Cruz-Lemini, M, Borras, A, Balasch, J and Gratacós, E (2016) Differential effect of mode of conception and infertility treatment on fetal growth and prematurity. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 29, 38793884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyns, C, de Geyter, C, Calhaz-Jorge, C, Kupka, M, Motrenko, T, Smeenk, J, Bergh, C, Tandler-Schneider, A, Rugescu, I, Vidakovic, S and Goossens, V (2017) ART in Europe, 2017: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Human Reproduction Open 3, 117.Google Scholar
Zádori, J, Kozinszky, Z, Orvos, H, Katona, M, Pál, A and Kovács, L (2003) Dilemma of increased obstetric risk in pregnancies following IVF-ET. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 20, 216221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Maternal and Newborn Characteristics among Term Births According to Conception (Spontaneous versus Assisted Conception)

Figure 1

Table 2. The Associations Between Birth Presentation and Maternal as well as Newborn Parameters among Singleton Term Births