Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T16:02:53.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Births by Caesarean section in the United States of America and in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Colin Francome  and
Peter J. Huntingford
Colin Francome
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science, Middlesex Polytechnic, The Burroughs, London
Peter J. Huntingford
Affiliation:
London Hospital Medical College, Turner Street, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The rise in Caesarian section rates has been much greater in the United States than in Britain. This article analyses the reasons for these trends and finds they are not clearly related to good medical practice. It is concluded that it should be a cause for concern if rates rise above 6% of live births. In this case operations must be shown to be in the best interests of the mothers and their babies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1980 , pp. 353 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, D. (1960) The evolution of modern obstetrics. Lancet, ii, 557, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskett, T.F. (1978) Casarean section: what is an acceptable rate? Can. med. Ass. J. 118, 1019.Google Scholar
Bunker, J. (1970) Surgical manpower: a comparison of operations and surgeons in the United States and in England and Wales. New Engl. J. Med. 283, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buremetta, E. (1974) Trends in Casarean section 1963–1972. Department of Health, State of New York.Google Scholar
Caire, J.B. (1978) Are current rates of Cesarean section justified? South. med. J. 71, 571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalmers, I., Richards, M. (1977) Intervention and causal inference in obstetric practice. In: Benefits and hazards of the New Obstetrics, p. 34, Edited by Chard, T. and Richards, M. P. M.. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 64. Spastics International/Heinemann Medical, London.Google Scholar
Cole, K.C. (1978) Cesarean sections. Newsday, 18 09, 8A–9A.Google Scholar
Coleman, W.S. (1978) Mother–newborn relationship following Ceasarean section. J. Pediat. 92, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1979) Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales 1973–1975. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Edington, P.T., Sibanda, J. & Beard, R.W. (1975) Influence on clinical practice of routine intrapartum fetal monitoring. Br. med. J. 3, 341.Google Scholar
Editorial (1976) Ceasarean section and respiratory distress syndrome. Br. med. J. 1, 978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, B..& English, D. (1978) For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts' Advice to Women. Plito press, London.Google Scholar
Evrard, J.R. & Gold, E.M. (1977) Cesarean section and maternal mortality in Rhode Island. Obstet. Gynec. N.Y. 50, 594.Google ScholarPubMed
Haddad, H. & Lundy, L. (1978) Changing indications for Cesarean section. Obstet. Gynec. N.Y. 51, 133.Google ScholarPubMed
Hibbard, L.T. (1976) Changing trends in Cesarean section. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 125, 798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughey, M.J., LaPata, R.E., McElin, T.W. & Lussky, R.L. (1977) The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of Cesarean section. Obstet. Gynec. N.Y. 49, 513.Google ScholarPubMed
Huntingford, P.J. (1978) Obstetrics: past, present and future. In: The Place of Birth. Edited by Kitzinger, S. and Davis, J.A.. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Huntingford, P.J. (1979) Obstetric practice—whose baby? Update, 18, 1529.Google Scholar
Jones, O.H. (1976) Cesarean section in present day obstetrics. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 126, 521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, V.C. & Kulkarni, D. (1973) Experience with fetal monitoring in a community hospital Obstet. Gynec. N.Y. 41, 818.Google Scholar
Merrill, R.S. & Gibbs, C.E. (1978) Planned vaginal delivery following Cesarean section. Obstet. Gynec. N.Y.. 52, 50.Google ScholarPubMed
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1979) Infant and Perinatal Mortality. DH1 79/1. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Stein, J.J. (1978) Making Medical Choices, p. 103. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar