Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • M. Mazharul Islam (a1), Faisal M. Ababneh (a1) and MD Hasinur Rahaman Khan (a2)


This study examined the recent level, trends and determinants of consanguineous marriage in Jordan using time-series data from the Jordan Population and Family Health Surveys (JPFHSs). According to the 2012 JPFHS, 35% of all marriages were consanguineous in Jordan in 2012. There has been a declining trend in consanguinity in the country, with the rate decreasing from a level of 57% in 1990. Most consanguineous marriage in 2012 were first cousin marriages, constituting 23% of all marriages and 66% of all consanguineous marriages. The data show that women with a lower age at marriage, older marriage cohort, larger family size, less than secondary level of education, rural place of residence, no employment, no exposure to mass media, a monogamous marriage, a husband with less than higher level of education and lower economic status, and those from the Badia region, were more likely to have a consanguineous marriage. Increasing age at marriage, level of education, urbanization and knowledge about the health consequences of consanguinity, and the ongoing socioeconomic and demographic transition in the country, will be the driving forces for further decline in consanguinity in Jordan.


Corresponding author

1 Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Al-Salem, M. & Rawashdeh, N. (1993) Consanguinity in north Jordan: prevalence and pattern. Journal of Biosocial Science 25(4), 553556.
Assaf, S. & Bradley, S. E. K. (2014) Trends in Demographic and Health Indicators in Jordan: Data from the 1990–2012 Jordan Population and Family Health Surveys. DHS Trends Report No. 8. ICF International. Rockville, MD, USA.
Bakoush, O., Bredan, A. & Denic, S. (2016) Kin and non-kin marriages and family structure in a rich tribal society. Journal of Biosocial Science 48(6), 797805.
Bittles, A. H. (2012) Consanguinity in Context. Cambridge University Press, London.
Department of Statistics & ICF International (2013) Jordan Population and Family Health Survey 2012. Department of Statistics, Jordan, and ICF International, Calverton, MD, USA.
Hamamy, H. A., Masri, A. T., Al-Hadidy, A. M. & Ajlouni, K. M. (2005) Consanguinity and genetic disorders. Profile from Jordan. Saudi Medical Journal 28, 10151017.
Hijazi, S. (1997) Child Growth and Nutrition in Jordan. Royal Scientific Society Publishers, Amman, Jordan.
Islam, M. M. (2012) The practice of consanguineous marriage in Oman: prevalence, tends and determinants. Journal of Biosocial Science 44, 571594.
Islam, M. M. (2017) Consanguineous marriage in Oman: understanding the community awareness about congenital effects of and attitude towards consanguineous marriage. Annals of Human Biology 44, 273286.
Jurdi, R. & Saxena, P. C. (2003) The prevalence and correlates of consanguineous marriage in Yemen: similarities and contrasts with other Arab countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 35, 113.
Khlat, M. (1997) Endogamy in the Arab world. In Teebi, A. S. & Farag, T. I. (eds) Genetic Disorders Among Arab Populations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 6382.
Khoury, S. A. & Massad, D. (1992) Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. American Journal of Medical Genetics 43(5), 769775.
Radovanovic, Z., Shah, N. & Behbehani, J. (1999) Prevalence and social correlates of consanguinity in Kuwait. Annals of Saudi Medicine 19(3), 206210.
Raz, A. E. & Atar, M. (2005) Perceptions of cousin marriage among young Bedouin adults in Israel. Marriage & Family Review 37(3), 2745.
Setlur, B. (2012) Project Information Document (Appraisal Stage) – JO-Badia Ecosystem and Livelihoods – P127861. World Bank, Washington, DC. URL:
Tadmouri, G. O., Nair, P., Obeid, T., Al Ali, M. T., Al Khaja, N. & Hamamy, H. A. (2009) Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproductive Health 6, 17.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


  • M. Mazharul Islam (a1), Faisal M. Ababneh (a1) and MD Hasinur Rahaman Khan (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.