Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T16:50:07.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential Fertility by Religious Group in Rural Sierra Leone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Mohamed Bailey
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA

Summary

This study examines the influence of Islam and Christianity (Catholicism and Protestantism) on fertility in rural Sierra Leone. Analyses using number of children ever born and number of living children for currently married women of childbearing ages 15–49 as measures of fertility show that Muslim fertility is lower than either Catholic or Protestant fertility net of relevant demographic and socioeconomic variables.

The interaction between wife's educational level and her religious affiliation was statistically significant for number of children ever born but not for number of living children. Religion is shown to be an important factor in differentiating fertility behaviour at different educational levels. Among wives with no schooling, differences in religion lead to small fertility differentials; among those with primary or higher education, the fertility differentials are substantial.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, B. (1981) Differential fertility in Bangladesh: a path analysis. Social Biol. 28, 102.Google ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, J.C. (1969) Some factors affecting fertility in Ghana. In: International Population Conference, Vol. 1, p. 751. IUSSP, Liège.Google Scholar
Chamie, J. (1977) Religious differentials in fertility: Lebanon, 1971. Popul. Stud. 31, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamie, J. (1981) Religion and Fertility: Arab Christian-Muslim Differentials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chaudhury, R.H. (1971) Differential fertility by religious groups in East Pakistan. Social Biol. 18, 188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clairin, R. (1969) Levels and factors of fertility in French speaking African countries. In: International Population Conference, Vol. 1, p. 760. IUSSP, Liège.Google Scholar
Cochrane, S. (1979) Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know? Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Encarnacion, J. (1974) Fertility and Labor Force Participation: Philippines 1968. Population and Employment Working Paper No. 2. International Labour Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
Gaisie, S.K. (1975) Fertility trends and differentials. In: Population Growth and Socio-economic Change in West Africa, p. 344. Edited by Caldwell, J. C.. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Goldscheider, C. (1971) Population, Modernization and Social Structure. Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. (1970) Religious fertility differentials in Thailand 1960. Popul. Stud. 24, 325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, D. (1967) Factors affecting Moslem natality. In: Proceedings of the World Population Conference, Vol. 2, p. 149. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Kish, L. (1965) Survey Sampling. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Mabogunje, A.L. (1972) Urban land policy and population in Nigeria. In: Population Growth and Economic Development in Africa, p. 238. Edited by Ominde, S. A. and Ejiogu, C. N.. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Page, H.J. (1975) Fertility levels: patterns and trends. In: Population Growth and Socio-economic Change in West Africa, p. 41. Edited by Caldwell, J. C.. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Podlewski, A. (1975) Cameroon. In: Population Growth and Socio-economic Change in West Africa, p. 553. Edited by Caldwell, J. C.. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sembajwe, I. (1980) Religious fertility differentials among the Yoruba of western Nigeria. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed