Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T18:27:43.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution of coitus within the human intermenstruum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

William H. James
William H. James
Affiliation:
Department of Biometry, Galton Laboratory, University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Daily records are the only acceptable basis for determining human coital rates. A re-analysis of such data presented by earlier writers and a study of new data suggest that within the intermenstruum (viz. the days on which there is no bleeding) the rate of coitus is highest immediately after menstruation ceases, declines thereafter and is lowest (within the intermenstruum) just before menstruation recurs.

It is not clear whether there is a minor peak around ovulation time, but such a correlation, if it exists, is certainly not very powerful.

The major cause of the higher coital rate after menstruation could be abstinence during menstruation and a post-menstrual feeling of release on the part of the woman.

The fact that coital rates are largely independent of the time of ovulation might be due to their being largely determined by the male. In any case, it provides evidence for Morris's view that human sexuality has important evolutionary functions other than reproduction.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , April 1971 , pp. 159 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bailey, J. & Marshall, J. (1970) The relationship of the post-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle to total cycle length. J. biosoc. Sci. 2, 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, J.& Hartman, C.G. (1935) Sexual excitability as related to the menstrual cycle in the monkey. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 29, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. & Marshall, J. (1969) The risk of conception on different days of the menstrual cycle. Popul. Stud. 23, 455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, W.G., Mosteller, F. & Tukey, J.W. (1954) Statistical problems of the Kinsey Report. American Statistical Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Davis, K.B. (1926) Periodicity of sex desire. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 12, 824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.A. (1963) Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 13th edn, p. 99. Oliver & Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Harter, H.L. (1964) A new table of percentage points of the chi square distribution. Biometrika, 51, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W.H. (1963) A note of correction with reference to parameters of the menstrual cycle and the efficiency of rhythm methods of contraception. Popul. Stud. 22, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W.H. (1968) The arithmetic of the rhythm method of contraception. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Commonw. 70, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. & Gebhard, P.H. (1953) Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
McCance, R.A., Luff, M.C. & Widdowson, E.E. (1937) Physical and emotional periodicity in women. J. Hyg., Camb. 37, 571.Google ScholarPubMed
Michael, R.P., Herbert, J. & Welegalla, J. (1967) Ovarian hormones and the sexual behaviour of the male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) under laboratory conditions. J. Endocr. 39, 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, R.P. & Zumpe, D. (1970) Rhythmic changes in the copulatory frequency of rhesus monkeys in relation to the menstrual cycle and a comparison with the human cycle. J. Reprod. Fert. 21, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. (1967) The Naked Ape, p. 58. Corgi Books, London.Google Scholar
Muggeridge, M. (1965) The American way of sex. Radio Times, 169 (No. 2188), 57.Google Scholar
Potter, R.G., Burch, T.K. & Matsumoto, S. (1967) Long cycles, late ovulation and calendar rhythm. Int. J. Fert. 12, 127.Google ScholarPubMed
Stopes, M.C. (1923) Married Love: a New Contribution to Sex Difficulties. Putnam's, London.Google Scholar
Terman, L.M. (1938) Psychological Factors in Marital Happiness. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1948) Kinsey's ‘Sexual Behavior in the Human Male’: some comments and criticisms. Psychol. Bull. 45, 443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udry, J.R. & Morris, N.M. (1967) A method for validation of reported sexual data. J. Marriage Fam. 29, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udry, J.R. & Morris, N.M. (1968) Distribution of coitus in the menstrual cycle. Nature, Lond. 220, 593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallis, W.A. (1949) Statistics of the Kinsey Report. J. Am. Statist. Ass. 44, 463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, S. & Parkes, A.S. (1932) The menstrual cycle of the Primates. V. The cycle of the baboon. Proc. zool. Soc. Part 1, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar