Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:55:33.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Galton Lecture 1970: The Obstetrician and Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

Dugald Baird
Dugald Baird
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am honoured to be asked to give the Galton Lecture and, as an obstetrician, I am particularly glad to give it in the context of this symposium devoted to biosocial aspects of fertility.

By comparison with the frightening problems of population control on a world scale, the control of Britain's population should be easy but, unfortunately, it has not been tackled with the urgency it demands. In the North East of Scotland, however, considerable progress has been made. We have a natural human laboratory for the study of this problem and other aspects of human reproduction. It has the advantage of relative isolation, homogeneous population, convenient size (half a million) and availability of scientific personnel from Research Institutes, University and National Health Service. In addition, very good relations exist between these bodies and the general public. Continuity of medical care facilitates long-term study of patients, assessment of needs and results of treatment. The people have become knowledgeable and co-operative.

Type
Sociological aspects
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 3 , supplement S3: Biosocial Aspects of Human Fertility , 1971 , pp. 93 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Friends Service Committee (1970) Who shall live? Report on Man's Control over Birth and Death. Hill & Wang, New York.Google Scholar
Askham, J. (1969) Delineation of the lowest social class. J. biosoc. Sci. 1, 327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, D. (1936) Birth Control and Maternal Health (National Birth Control Conference in Glasgow, July 1936). The Scottish Nurse. 176.Google Scholar
De Hass-Posthuma, J.H. (1963) Perinatale sterfte in Nederland. Proceedings of the Organisation for Health Research T.N.O. Series A, No. 11, 220. Van Gorcum-Assen.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1908) Memories of My Life. Methuen, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1966) The history and future of birth control. Persp. Biol. Med. 10, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, J. (1941) The Uniqueness of Man. Chatto & Windus, London.Google Scholar
Illsley, R. (1963) Perinatal Mortality. Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Illsley, R. & Gill, D. (1968) New fashions in illegitimacy. New Society, 709.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. (1969) Referred to in Report on Symposium on ‘Man and his Science’ held in Melbourne, 15th September 1969. Lancet, ii, 739.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. & Baird, D. (1968) Follow-up of 186 sterilised women. Lancet, i, 1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. & Illsley, R. (1969) Family growth in Aberdeen. J. biosoc. Sci. 1, 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation (1966) Foetal Mortality (1961/63) According to cause per 100,000 live births. Epidem. Vital Statist. Rep. 19, No. 6, 257. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar