Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T01:48:31.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indirect measurements of family size preferences and of abortion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

J. C. Barret
J. C. Barret
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Matrices are derived for converting the proportions of couples wanting various completed family sizes to proportions attaining given sizes of families at a given time, based on a simulation model in which couples commence the regular use of contraception as soon as the decision is made to have not more than one further child. The matrices are adapted to include a proportion of ‘prospective aborters’ who are prepared to have recourse to abortion if contraception fails. A measure of consistency between the family size preferences estimated for different durations of marriage is introduced. This measure, together with the conversion matrices, is used to estimate the distribution of aborters and of family size preferences among a cohort of women married in England and Wales in 1920–24 at ages 20–24.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 1977 , pp. 279 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © 1977, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J.C. & Brass, W. (1974) Systematic and change components in fertility measurement. Popul. Stud. 28, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. (1967) Population policy: will current programs succeed?. Science, N.Y. 158, 730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, M., Steinhoff, P.A., Palmore, J.A. & Smith, R.G. (1973) Sexuality, birth control and abortion: a decision-making sequence. J. biosoc. Sci. 5, 347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, C. (1973) Decision-making in therapeutic abortion. In: Experience with Abortion, p. 333. Edited by Horobin, G.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freedman, R., Coombs, L.C. & Bumpass, L. (1965) Stability and change in expectations about family size: a longitudinal study. Demography, 2, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, R. & Takeshita, J.Y. (1969) Family Planning in Taiwan: An Experiment in Social Change. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, D.V. & Grebenik, E. (1954) The Trend and Pattern of Fertility in Great Britain. Papers of the Royal Commission on Population, Vol. VI, Part 2, Tables G and H. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Greenberg, B.G., Kuebler, R.R., Abernethy, J.R. & Horvitz, D.V. (1971) Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data. J. Am. statist. Ass. 66, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horobin, G. (1973) Experience with Abortion, p. 358. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
James, W. (1971) The incidence of illegal abortion. Popul. Stud. 25, 327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leete, R. (1976) Some comments on the demographic and social effects of the 1967 Abortion Act. J. biosoc. Sci. 8, 229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis-Faning, E. (1949) Report on an Enquiry into Family Limitation and its Influence on Human Fertility during the Past Fifty Years. Papers of the Royal Commission on Population, Vol. 1. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mandani, M. (1972) The Myth of Population Control. Monthly Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
Namboodiri, K. (1974) Which couples at given parties expect to have additional births? An exercise in discriminant analysis. Demography, 11, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, P.C. (1973) Social and psychological characteristics at referral. In: Experience with Abortion, p. 165. Edited by Horobin, G.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Potter, R. (1972) Additional births averted when abortion is added to contraception. Stud. Fam. Plann. 3, 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tietze, C. (1969) Demographic Aspects of Abortion in the United States. Paper T, 4.2, International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, London.Google Scholar
Tietze, C. & Bongaarts, J. (1975) Fertility rates and abortion rates: simulation of family limitation. Stud. Fam. Plann. 6, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tietze, C. & Dawson, D.A. (1973) Induced Abortion: a Factbook. Reports on Population/Family Planning, 14, p. 1. The Population Council, New York.Google Scholar