Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Misreporting in rural fertility data: an analysis of husband–wife disagreement

  • C. Vlassoff (a1) and M. Vlassoff (a1)
Summary
Summary

Two independent, concurrent demographic surveys in rural India, one male, the other female, were used to examine misreporting of ever-born children among 223 couples common to both samples. Husband-wife disagreements were checked in detail and characteristics of the errors and of the misreporters themselves were analysed. ‘Forgetting’ of dead children was the main cause of mistaken reporting. Another type of error was found to be sex-related: men, but not women, confused fetal deaths with live births. Of the various correlates of male misreporting tested, only age appeared to be a determining factor. On the other hand, traditional attitudes and overall response reliability were more important than age in explaining female errors. No significant relationships between faulty reporting and socio-economic status or family size were established. Various suggestions are made for minimizing fertility misreporting in surveys of rural, illiterate populations.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bogue D.G. & Bogue E.J. (1970) Techniques of Pregnancy History Analysis. University of Chicago, Chicago.
Brass W. & Coale A.J. (1968) Methods of analysis and estimation. In: The Demography of Tropical Africa, pp. 88142. Edited by Brass W. et al. . Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Brass W. (1975) Methods for Estimating Fertility and Mortality from Limited and Defective Data. Laboratories for Population Statistics, Chapel Hill.
Cartwright A. & Moffett J. (1974) A comparison of results obtained by men and women interviewers in a fertility survey. J. biosoc. Sci. 6, 315.
Cartwright A. & Prince E. (1975) The repeatability of data obtained in a fertility survey. J. biosoc. Sci. 7, 207.
Freedman R. & Takeshita J.Y. (1969) Family Planning in Taiwan. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Poffenberger T. & Poffenberger S.B. (1973) The social psychology of fertility behaviour in a village in India. In: Psychological Perspectives on Population, pp. 135162. Edited by Fawcett J. T.. Basic Books, New York.
Potter J.E. (1977) Methods of detecting errors in WFS data: an application to the Fiji Fertility Study, Part 2. In: International Population Conference, Mexico 1977, Vol. 1, pp. 101120. IUSSP, Liege.
Shryock H.S., Siegel J.S. et al. . (1973) The Methods and Materials of Demography, Vol. 2, Government Printing Office, Washington.
Srivastava M.L. (1976) Utility of male and female investigators in surveys related to fertility and family planning—a pilot study. J. Family Welfare, 22, 9.
Van De Walle E. (1968) Characteristics of African demographic data. In: The Demography of Tropical Africa, pp. 1287. Edited by Brass W. et al. . Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Vlassoff C. (1978) The Significance of Cultural Tradition for Contraceptive Change: A Study of Rural Indian Women. Ph.D. thesis. University of Poona, Poona.
Wyon J.B. & Gordon J.E. (1971) The Khanna Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Biosocial Science
  • ISSN: 0021-9320
  • EISSN: 1469-7599
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 59 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.