Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Islam, Towfiqua Mahfuza Tareque, Md. Ismail Sugawa, Makiko and Kawahara, Kazuo 2015. Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Bangladesh. Journal of Family Violence, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 433.


    Spiwak, Rae Logsetty, Sarvesh Afifi, Tracie O. and Sareen, Jitender 2015. Severe partner perpetrated burn: Examining a nationally representative sample of women in India. Burns, Vol. 41, Issue. 8, p. 1847.


    ×

SON PREFERENCE AND INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE VICTIMIZATION IN INDIA: EXAMINING THE ROLE OF ACTUAL AND DESIRED FAMILY COMPOSITION

  • SHAGUN SABARWAL (a1), MARIE C. McCORMICK (a1), S. V. SUBRAMANIAN (a1) and JAY G. SILVERMAN (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002193201100037X
  • Published online: 15 July 2011
Abstract
Summary

Son preference has been considered as a determinant of women's risk of intimate partner violence (IPV) experience in India, although quantitative evidence from large nationally representative studies testing this relationship is limited. This study examines the association between husband's son preference, sex composition of children and risk of physical and sexual IPV victimization among wives. Information was collected for 26,284 couples in the nationally representative 2005–2006 National Family Health Survey of India. The exposures were husband's son preference measured as husband's desire for one or more sons greater than the number of daughters and sex composition of the household: only sons, only daughters and mixed. Outcome included past year physical and/or sexual IPV. The results showed that husband's reported son preference (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.98–1.13) and sex composition of children were not associated with risk for IPV victimization in the models adjusted for socio-demographic factors. The findings from this first population-based study of socio-cultural norms around son preference and married Indian women's risk for IPV victimization indicate that cultural preference for sons does not influence women's risk for IPV victimization.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. K. Ackerson , I. Kawachi , E. M. Barbeau & S. V. Subramanian (2008) Effects of individual and proximate educational context on intimate partner violence: a population-based study of women in India. American Journal of Public Health 98, 507514.

A. M. Basu (1998) Is discrimination in food really necessary for explaining sex differentials in childhood mortality? Population Studies 43, 193210.

S. Clark (2003) Son preference and sex composition of children: evidence from India. Demography 37, 95108.

C. Garcia-Moreno , H. A. F. M. Jansen , M. Ellsberg , L. Heise & C. H. Watts (2006) Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Lancet 368, 12601269.

A. Gill & T. Mitra-Kahn (2009) Explaining daughter devaluation and the issue of missing women in South Asia and the UK. Current Sociology 57, 684703

A. Jayaraman , V. Mishra & F. Arnold (2009) The relationship of family size and composition to fertility desires, contraceptive adoption and method choice in South Asia. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 35, 2938.

P. Jha , R. Kumar , P. Vasa , N. Dhingra , D. Thiruchelvam & R. Moineddin (2006) Low female-to-male sex ratio of children born in India: national survey of 1.1 million households. Lancet 367, 211218.

S. J. Jejeebhoy (1998) Associations between wife-beating and fetal and infant death: impressions from a survey in rural India. Studies in Family Planning 29, 300308.

S. J. Jejeebhoy & R. J. Cook (1997) State accountability for wife-beating: the Indian challenge. Lancet 349, 1012.

A. H. Khosla , D. Dua , L. Devi & S. S. Sud (2005) Domestic violence in pregnancy in North Indian women. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences 59, 195199.

M. A. Koenig , R. Stephenson , S. Ahmed , S. J. Jejeebhoy & J. Campbell (2006) Individual and contextual determinants of domestic violence in North India. American Journal of Public Health 96, 132138.

R. T. Naved , S. Azim , A. Bhuiya & L. A. Persson (2006) Physical violence by husbands: magnitude, disclosure and help-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine 62, 29172929.

R. Pande & N. Astone (2007) Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review 26, 129.

V. Rao (1997) Wife-beating in rural south India: a qualitative and econometric analysis. Social Science & Medicine 44, 11691180.

M. Rodrigues , V. Patel , S. Jaswal & N. de Souza (2003) Listening to mothers: qualitative studies on motherhood and depression from Goa, India. Social Science & Medicine 57, 17971806.

S. R. Schuler , S. M. Hashemi , A. P. Riley & S. Akhter (1996) Credit programs, patriarchy and men's violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine 43, 17291742.

S. Srinivasan & A. Bedi (2007) Domestic violence and dowry: evidence from a south Indian village. World Development 35, 857880.

S. Sudha & S. I. Rajan (1999) Female demographic disadvantage in India: sex selective abortions and female infanticide. Development and Change 30, 585618.

A. Winkvist & H. Z. Akhtar (2000) God should give daughters to rich families only: attitudes towards childbearing among low-income women in Punjab, Pakistan. Social Science & Medicine 51, 7381.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Biosocial Science
  • ISSN: 0021-9320
  • EISSN: 1469-7599
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×