Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Open access
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Wiese, Bettina S. Burk, Christian L. and Jaeckel, Dalit 2016. Transition to Grandparenthood and Job-Related Attitudes: Do Grandparental Sex and Lineage Matter?. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 78, Issue. 3, p. 830.


    Bressan, Paola and Kramer, Peter 2015. Human kin detection. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 299.


    Danielsbacka, Mirkka Tanskanen, Antti O. and Rotkirch, Anna 2015. Impact of Genetic Relatedness and Emotional Closeness on Intergenerational Relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 77, Issue. 4, p. 889.


    Snopkowski, Kristin and Sear, Rebecca 2015. Grandparental help in Indonesia is directed preferentially towards needier descendants: A potential confounder when exploring grandparental influences on child health. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 128, p. 105.


    ×

TESTING EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES OF DISCRIMINATIVE GRANDPARENTAL INVESTMENT

  • RALF KAPTIJN (a1), FLEUR THOMESE (a1), AART C. LIEFBROER (a1) (a2) and MERRIL SILVERSTEIN (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021932012000612
  • Published online: 15 November 2012
Abstract
Summary

This study tests two evolutionary hypotheses on grandparental investments differentiated by the child's sex: the paternity uncertainty hypothesis and the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. Data are from two culturally different countries: the Dutch Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (n=2375) and the Chinese Anhui Survey (n=4026). In the Netherlands, grandparental investments are biased towards daughters' children, which is in accordance with the paternity uncertainty hypothesis. But in China, grandparental investments are biased towards sons' children, which is in conflict with the paternity uncertainty hypothesis. This study found no support for the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. These results raise doubts over the relevance of paternity uncertainty as an explanation of a grandparental investment bias towards daughters' children that is often found in Western populations. The results suggest that discriminative grandparental investments are better understood as the outcome of cultural prescriptions and economic motives.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      TESTING EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES OF DISCRIMINATIVE GRANDPARENTAL INVESTMENT
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      TESTING EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES OF DISCRIMINATIVE GRANDPARENTAL INVESTMENT
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      TESTING EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES OF DISCRIMINATIVE GRANDPARENTAL INVESTMENT
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Almond & L. Edlund (2007) Trivers–Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983–2001. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274, 24912496.

K. G. Anderson (2006) How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Evidence from worldwide nonpaternity rates. Current Anthropology 47, 513520.

D. I. Bishop , B. C. Meyer , T. M. Schmidt & B. R. Gray (2009) Differential investment behavior between grandparents and grandchildren: the role of paternity uncertainty. Evolutionary Psychology 7, 6677.

R. Boyd & P. J. Richerson (2009) Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 32813288.

G. R. Brown , K. N. Laland & M. Borgerhoff Mulder (2009) Bateman's principles and human sex roles. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 297304.

D. M. Buss & D. P. Schmitt (1993) Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100, 204232.

E. Cardia & S. Ng (2003) Intergenerational time transfers and childcare. Review of Economic Dynamics 6, 431454.

D. J. H. Deeg , T. Van Tilburg , J. H. Smit & E. D. De Leeuw (2002) Attrition in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: the effect of differential inclusion in side studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55, 319328.

J. S. Dubas (2001) How gender moderates the grandparent–grandchild relationship: a comparison of kin-keeper and kin-selector theories. Journal of Family Issues 22, 478492.

A. R. Eisenberg (1988) Grandchildren's perspectives on relationships with grandparents: the influence of gender across generations. Sex Roles 19, 205217.

H. A. Euler , S. Hoier & P. A. Rohde (2001) Relationship-specific closeness of intergenerational family ties: findings from evolutionary psychology and implications for models of cultural transmission. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32, 147158.

M. Fieder & S. Huber (2007) The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 392398.

K. Fingerman , L. Miller , K. Birditt & S. Zarit (2009) Giving to the good and the needy: parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family 71, 12201233.

M. Fox , R. Sear , J. Beise , G. Ragsdale , E. Voland & L. A. Knapp (2010) Grandma plays favourites: X-chromosome relatedness and sex-specific childhood mortality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277, 567573.

D. Friedman , M. Hechter & D. Kreager (2008) A theory of the value of grandchildren. Rationality and Society 20, 3163.

S. J. C. Gaulin & C. J. Robbins (1991) Trivers–Willard effect in contemporary North American society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 85, 6169.

M. Gilding (2009) Paternity uncertainty and evolutionary psychology: how a seemingly capricious occurrence fails to follow laws of greater generality. Sociology 43, 140157.

R. Kaptijn , F. Thomese , T. Van Tilburg & A. Liefbroer (2010) How grandparents matter: support for the cooperative breeding hypothesis in a contemporary Dutch population. Human Nature 21, 393405.

V. King & G. H. Elder Jr (1995) American children view their grandparents: linked lives across three rural generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family 57, 165178.

V. King , M. Silverstein , G. H. Elder Jr, V. L. Bengtson & R. D. Conger (2003) Relations with grandparents: rural midwest versus urban Southern California. Journal of Family Issues 24, 10441069.

S. Koziel & S. J. Ulijaszek (2001) Waiting for Trivers and Willard: do the rich really favor sons? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 115, 7179.

H. Kunemund & M. Rein (1999) There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society 19, 93121.

S. M. Laham , K. Gonsalkorale & W. Von Hippel (2005) Darwinian grandparenting: preferential investment in more certain kin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31, 6372.

M. Lahdenpera , V. Lummaa , S. Helle , M. Tremblay & A. F. Russell (2004) Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Nature 428, 178181.

M. Lahdenpera , A. F. Russell & V. Lummaa (2007) Selection for long lifespan in men: benefits of grandfathering? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274, 24372444.

A. Magnuson , L. Bodin & S. M. Montgomery (2007) Father's occupation and sex ratio of offspring. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 35, 454459.

R. L. Michalski & T. K. Shackelford (2005) Grandparental investment as a function of relational uncertainty and emotional closeness with parents. Human Nature 16, 293305.

A. Pashos (2000) Does paternal uncertainty explain discriminative grandparental solicitude? A cross-cultural study in Greece and Germany. Evolution and Human Behavior 21, 97109.

K. Pillemer & J. J. Suitor (2006) Making choices: a within-family study of caregiver selection. The Gerontologist 46, 439448.

T. V. Pollet , D. Nettle & M. Nelissen (2007) Maternal grandmothers do go the extra mile: factoring distance and lineage into differential contact with children. Evolutionary Psychology 5, 832843.

C. A. Salmon (1999) On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature 10, 183197.

B. Strassmann & W. Garrard (2011) Alternatives to the grandmother hypothesis. Human Nature 22, 201222.

A. O. Tanskanen , A. Rotkirch & M. Danielsbacka (2011) Do grandparents favor granddaughters? Biased grandparental investment in UK. Evolution and Human Behavior 32, 407415.

R. L. Trivers & D. E. Willard (1973) Natural-selection of parental ability to vary sex-ratio of offspring. Science 179, 9092.

D. Waynforth (2012) Grandparental investment and reproductive decisions in the longitudinal 1970 British cohort study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 11551160.

J. Wheelock & K. Jones (2002) ‘Grandparents are the next best thing’: informal childcare for working parents in urban Britain. Journal of Social Policy 31, 441463.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Biosocial Science
  • ISSN: 0021-9320
  • EISSN: 1469-7599
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×