Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:01:23.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voluntary sterilisation among Canadian women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Margaret De Wit  and
Fernando Rajulton
Margaret De Wit
Affiliation:
Population Studies Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Fernando Rajulton
Affiliation:
Population Studies Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Using data from the 1984 Canadian Fertility Survey, proportional hazards modelling was employed to determine factors associated with the likelihood of voluntary sterilisation among 5315 women of childbearing age, and the trends in timing and differences in the likelihood associated with different age cohorts. Multivariate analysis suggests that educational attainment, parity and duration since last birth at the time of sterilisation, religious commitment, province of residence and marital status at the time of sterilisation, are all important predictors. Education and parity attainment emerged as the best predictors of the timing of voluntary sterilisation in all age cohorts, but the contribution of other covariates varies between cohorts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1991 , pp. 263 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balakrishnan, T. R. & Chen, J. (1990) Religiosity, nuptiality and reproduction in Canada. Can. Rev. Social. Anthropol. 27, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, T. R., Krotki, K. & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (1985) Contraceptive use in Canada, 1984. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 17, 209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birdsall, N. & Chester, L. A. (1987) Contraception and the status of women: what is the link? Fam. Plann. Perspect. 19, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, D. R. (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J. R. statist. Soc. Ser. B, 34, 184.Google Scholar
Pratt, W. F., Mosher, W. D., Bachrach, C. A. & Horn, M. C. (1984) Understanding US fertility: findings from the National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 3. Popul. Bull. 39, 1.Google Scholar
Rajulton, F., Balakrishnan, T. R. & Chen, J. (1990) Changes in the timing of fertility—a Canadian experience. J. biosoc. Sci. 22, 33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughan, B., Trussell, J., Menken, J. & Jones, E. F. (1977) Contraceptive failure among married women in the United States, 1970–1973. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 9, 251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C. F. & McCarthy, J. (1979) Sterilization in the United States. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 11, 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C. F. & Ryder, N. B. (1977) The Contraceptive Revolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
Wolfe, B. L. (1980) Childbearing and/or labour force participation: the education connection. Res. Popul. Econ. 2, 365.Google Scholar