Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T05:32:32.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Making of a Translator: James Strachey and the Origins of British Psychoanalysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2014

Erik Linstrum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both critics and defenders of James Strachey's translations of Sigmund Freud have tended to judge their worth by the standard of “accuracy”—in other words, their faithfulness to Freud's theories. This article takes a different approach, tracing Strachey's choices as a translator to his own experiences in Edwardian, wartime, and interwar Britain. Convinced that the ruling elite and the mass public alike were captive to dangerously irrational forces, Strachey saw the science of the unconscious as a vehicle for political and social criticism. As an attempt to mobilize expert knowledge against the status quo, Strachey's translation represents a divergence from two influential paradigms for interpreting the history of psychoanalysis: Carl Schorske's account of the Freudian “retreat from politics” and Michel Foucault's portrait of the “superstructural” state as an extension and ally of the human sciences. Strachey's translation also demonstrates that the political and social ambitions of British psychoanalysis were powerfully formed by the era of the First World War, and not only the Second, which historians have often identified as the crucial moment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 685 - 704
Copyright
Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lord Cromer to James Strachey, 12 May 1911, British Library (hereafter BL) Add. MSS 60664.

2 James Strachey to Rupert Brooke, 3 June 1910, in Hale, Keith, ed., Friends and Apostles: The Correspondence of Rupert Brooke and James Strachey, 1905–1914 (New Haven, 1998), 123Google Scholar.

3 Strachey, James, general preface to the Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 1, Pre-Psycho-Analytic Publications and Unpublished Drafts (London, 1966), xviii–xixGoogle Scholar.

4 MacCarthy, Desmond, “Notes on the Novel,” in Criticism (London, 1932), 171–72Google Scholar; Johnson, George M., “‘The Spirit of the Age’: Virginia Woolf's Response to Second Wave Psychology,” Twentieth Century Literature 40, no. 2 (1994): 139–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jouve, Nicole Ward, “Virginia Woolf and Psychoanalysis,” in The Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf (Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar; Abel, Elizabeth J., Virginia Woolf and the Fictions of Psychoanalysis (Chicago, 1989)Google Scholar; Nicholson, Nigel, ed., The Letters of Virginia Woolf, vol. 3 (New York, 1976), 134–35Google Scholar; Woolf, Virginia, “Freudian Fiction,” in The Essays of Virginia Woolf, ed. McNeillie, Andrew, vol. 3, 1919–1924 (San Diego, 1988)Google Scholar.

5 Winslow, Ted, “Bloomsbury, Freud, and the Vulgar Passions,” Social Research 57, no. 4 (1990): 785–819Google Scholar; Williams, Raymond, “The Bloomsbury Fraction,” in The Raymond Williams Reader, ed. Higgins, John (Oxford, 2001)Google Scholar.

6 Williams, “Bloomsbury Fraction.”

7 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 25 November 1909, BL Add. MSS 60708; Alix Strachey to James Strachey, 23 November 1924, in Meisel, Perry and Kendrick, Walter, eds., Bloomsbury/Freud: The Letters of James and Alix Strachey, 1924–1925 (New York, 1985), 126Google Scholar; James Strachey, “Noses or Hypnoses?” 1 February 1908, BL Add. MSS 81952.

8 Earl of Cromer, Modern Egypt (New York, 1908), 7Google Scholar.

9 Caine, Barbara, Bombay to Bloomsbury: A Biography of the Strachey Family (Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar. For the criticism, see Bettelheim, Bruno, Freud and Man's Soul (New York, 1983)Google Scholar; Ornston, Darius, “Strachey's Influence: A Preliminary Report,” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 63 (1982): 409–26Google ScholarPubMed; idem, “The Invention of ‘Cathexis’ and Strachey's Strategy,” International Review of Psycho-Analysis 12 (1985): 391–99Google Scholar; idem, ed., Translating Freud (New Haven, CT, 1992)Google Scholar. For an eloquent defense, see Wilson, Emmett, “Did Strachey Invent Freud?” International Review of Psycho-Analysis 14 (1987): 299–315Google Scholar.

10 The most detailed treatment of James Strachey, along with his wife and collaborator, Alix, is Caine, Barbara, “The Stracheys and Psychoanalysis,” History Workshop Journal 45 (1998): 145–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar, which discusses the intellectual problems of translation only in passing. Correspondence from two different phases of Strachey's life has been published in Hale, Friends and Apostles, and Meisel and Kendrick, Bloomsbury/Freud. Biographical accounts of varying detail can be found in studies of the Strachey family, including Caine, Bombay to Bloomsbury; Holroyd, Michael, Lytton Strachey: The New Biography (New York, 1994)Google Scholar; Sanders, Charles Richard, The Strachey Family, 1588–1932 (Durham, NC, 1953)Google Scholar; Strachey, Barbara, The Strachey Line: An English Family in America, in India, and at Home, 1570 to 1920 (London, 1985)Google Scholar. On his role in the English publication of Freud, see Willis, J. H., Leonard and Virginia Woolf as Publishers: The Hogarth Press, 1917–41 (Charlottesville, VA, 1992)Google Scholar, chap. 8. On the important context of Cambridge, see Lubenow, W. C., The Cambridge Apostles, 1820–1914: Liberalism, Imagination and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar.

11 Gay, Peter, Freud: A Life for Our Time (New York, 1998)Google Scholar; Sulloway, Frank J., Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend (Cambridge, MA, 1992)Google Scholar; Toews, John E., “Historicizing Psychoanalysis: Freud in His Time and for Our Time,” Journal of Modern History 63, no. 3 (1991): 504–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The general editor of the recent New Penguin Freud has professed admiration for Strachey's Standard Edition, if not for the idea of a “standard” edition itself: see Phillips, Adam, “After Strachey,” London Review of Books 29, no. 19 (2007): 36–38Google Scholar.

12 Winslow, “Bloomsbury, Freud, and the Vulgar Passions,” 786.

13 See, for instance, Elshakry, Marwa, Reading Darwin in Arabic, 1860–1950 (Chicago, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Burke, Peter, The Fortunes of The Courtier: The European Reception of Castiglione's Cortegiano (University Park, PA, 1996)Google Scholar, chap. 5; Hofmeyr, Isabel, The Portable Bunyan: A Transnational History of The Pilgrim's Progress (Princeton, 2004)Google Scholar; Sheehan, Jonathan, The Enlightenment Bible: Translation, Scholarship, Culture (Princeton, NJ, 2005)Google Scholar. On the ideal of “transparency” that has pushed translation to the margins of Anglo-American literary culture, see Venuti, Lawrence, The Translator's Invisibility: A History of Translation (London, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Foucault, Michel, “Truth and Power” (1976), in Power, ed. Faubion, James D. and trans. Hurley, Robert (New York, 2000)Google Scholar; Rose, Nikolas, Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London, 1999), xxiGoogle Scholar; Schorske, Carl E., Fin-de-Siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture (New York, 1981)Google Scholar.

15 Froula, Christine, Virginia Woolf and the Bloomsbury Avant-Garde: War, Civilization, Modernity (New York, 2005)Google Scholar; Brantlinger, Patrick, “‘The Bloomsbury Fraction’ versus War and Empire,” in Seeing Double: Revisioning Edwardian and Modernist Literature, ed. Kaplan, Carola and Simpson, Anne (New York, 1996)Google Scholar.

16 Thomson, Matthew, Psychological Subjects: Identity, Culture, and Health in Twentieth-Century Britain (Oxford, 2006), 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Thomson, Psychological Subjects; Rapp, Dean, “The Early Discovery of Freud by the British General Educated Public, 1912–1919,” Social History of Medicine 3, no. 2 (1990): 217–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

18 Hinshelwood, R. D., “Psychoanalysis in Britain: Points of Cultural Access,” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 76 (February 1995): 135–51Google ScholarPubMed; Forrester, John, “Freud in Cambridge,” Critical Quarterly 46, no. 2 (2004): 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Forrester, John, “1919: Psychology and Psychoanalysis, London and Cambridge,” Psychoanalysis and History 10, no. 1 (2008)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

19 Overy, Richard, The Morbid Age: Britain between the Wars (London, 2009)Google Scholar, chap. 4; Makari, George, Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis (New York, 2009), 446–47Google Scholar.

20 Rose, Nikolas, The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England, 1869–1939 (London, 1985), 182Google Scholar; Overy, Morbid Age, 145–51.

21 Shapira, Michal, The War Inside: Child Psychoanalysis and the Democratic Self in Britain, 1930–1960 (Cambridge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zaretsky, Eli, Secrets of the Soul: A Social and Cultural History of Psychoanalysis (New York, 2004), chap. 10Google Scholar; Rose, Governing the Soul, 157; Waters, Chris, “The Homosexual as a Social Being in Britain, 1945–1968,” Journal of British Studies 51, no. 3 (2012): 685–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 The most prominent stimulus to psychological research in the Second World War—the equivalent of shell shock in the First—was the evacuation of children from urban centers during the Blitz. See Titmuss, Richard M., Problems of Social Policy (London, 1951)Google Scholar; Welshman, John, “Evacuation and Social Policy during the Second World War: Myth and Reality,” Twentieth Century British History 9 (1998): 28–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michal Shapira, “The Psychological Study of Anxiety in the Era of the Second World War,” Twentieth Century British History 24, no. 1 (2012).

23 Hayward, Rhodri, “The Invention of the Psychosocial: An Introduction,” History of the Human Sciences 25, no. 5 (2012): 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hayward, Rhodri, “Enduring Emotions: James L. Halliday and the Invention of the Psychosocial,” Isis 100 (2009): 827–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Forrester, “Freud in Cambridge,” 19–20; Winslow, Ted, “Keynes and Freud: Keynes's Account of the ‘Animal Spirits’ of Capitalism,” Social Research 53, no. 4 (1986): 549–78Google Scholar.

25 Wells, H. G., “The Gifts of the New Sciences,” Strand Magazine 67 (1924): 156Google Scholar.

26 Strachey, James, “Obituary: Joan Riviere (1883–1962),” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 44 (1963): 229Google Scholar. On the Society for Psychical Research and the broader context of spiritualism, see Oppenheim, Janet, The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914 (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar; Owen, Alex, The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern (Chicago, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 “Can We Purify Cemeteries?” 11 May 1907, BL Add. MSS 81952; Forrester, John, “Freud in Cambridge,” Critical Quarterly 46, no. 2 (2004): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “1919: Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Cambridge and London—Myers, Jones and MacCurdy,” Psychoanalysis and History 10, no. 1 (2008): 37–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strachey, “Obituary: Joan Riviere,” 229.

28 Freud, Sigmund, “A Note on the Unconscious in Psycho-Analysis,” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research 26 (November 1912): 312–18Google Scholar.

29 Noel Olivier to James Strachey, 5 August 1912, BL Add. MSS 60684; James Strachey to John St. Loe Strachey (draft), 5 December 1913, BL Add. MSS 60713. On the typicality of these symptoms, see Oppenheim, Janet, “Shattered Nerves”: Doctors, Patients, and Depression in Victorian England (New York, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lubenow, Cambridge Apostles, 72–78.

30 Holroyd, Lytton Strachey, 9–10, 157; Caine, Bombay to Bloomsbury, 32–34.

31 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 5 April 1907, BL Add. MSS 60706.

32 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 14 August 1910 and 28 November 1910, BL Add. MSS 60708; Belloc, H., A Change in the Cabinet (London, 1909)Google Scholar.

33 Caine, Bombay to Bloomsbury, chap. 11.

34 James Strachey to Rupert Brooke, 5 January 1909, in Hale, Friends and Apostles, 54; James Strachey to John Henderson, 31 December 1913, BL Add. MSS 60713.

35 On the “gentleman leader” in Victorian politics, see Joyce, Patrick, Visions of the People: Industrial England and the Question of Class, c. 1848–1914 (Cambridge, 1991), 45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Biagini, Eugenio F., Liberalism, Retrenchment, and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860–1880 (Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar; Epstein, James and Belchem, John, “The Nineteenth-Century Gentleman Leader Revisited,” in Epstein, James, In Practice: Studies in the Language and Culture of Popular Politics in Modern Britain (Stanford, 2003)Google Scholar.

36 Holroyd, Lytton Strachey, 156; Tickner, Lisa, The Spectacle of Women: Imagery of the Suffrage Campaign, 1907–14 (Chicago, 1988), 73–78Google Scholar.

37 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 9 June 1910, BL Add. MSS 60708.

38 Tickner, Spectacle of Women; Vernon, James, Hunger: A Modern History (Cambridge, MA, 2007), 65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 31 July 1914, BL Add. MSS 60710.

40 Winnicott, D. W., “James Strachey, 1887–1967,” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 50 (1969): 129Google ScholarPubMed; James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 20 August 1914, 31 July 1914, and 18 August 1914, BL Add. MSS 60710.

41 Castle, H. G., Fire over England: The German Air Raids of World War I (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Grayzel, Susan R., At Home and Under Fire: Air Raids and Culture in Britain from the Great War to the Blitz (Cambridge, 2012)Google Scholar.

42 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 8 September 1915, BL Add. MSS 60710.

43 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 15 June 1915, BL Add. MSS 60710; James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 2 October 1917, BL Add. MSS 60711; James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 15 October 1914, BL Add. MSS 60710.

44 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 24 April 1918, BL Add. MSS 60711.

45 James Strachey to H. T. J. Norton, 3 May 1915, BL Add. MSS 60713.

46 Lella Sargant-Florence to James Strachey, 6 December 1929, BL Add. MSS 60696.

47 Noel Olivier to James Strachey, 9 December 1920 and 24 April 1921, BL Add. MSS 60686.

48 Karin Stephen, 30 September 1917, BL Add. MSS 60700.

49 Woolf, Leonard, Sowing: An Autobiography of the Years 1880–1904 (London, 1960), 160–61Google Scholar; MacGowan, John, “Modernity and Culture: The Victorians and Cultural Studies,” in Victorian Afterlife: Postmodern Culture Rewrites the Nineteenth Century, ed. Kucich, John and Sadoff, Dianne F. (Minneapolis, 2000)Google Scholar; Sweet, Matthew, Inventing the Victorians (New York, 2001)Google Scholar.

50 Holroyd, Lytton Strachey, 148; James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 23 January 1914, BL Add. MSS 60709.

51 Wilson, “Did Strachey Invent Freud?”

52 Standard Edition, vol. 1, xix. See also Caine, “Stracheys and Psychoanalysis,” 156–57.

53 Sigmund Freud to Ernest Jones, 1 December 1927 and 7 July 1935, in The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Ernest Jones, 1908–1939, ed. Paskauskas, R. Andrew (Cambridge, MA, 1993)Google Scholar, 637, 745.

54 For the classic statement on the “indeterminacy of translation,” see Quine, W. V. O., Word and Object (Cambridge, MA, 1960)Google Scholar.

55 Girard, Claude, “La psychanalyse en Grande-Bretagne,” in Histoire de la Psychanalyse, ed. Jaccard, Roland (Paris, 1982), 383Google Scholar. See also Freud, Sigmund, “The Question of Lay Analysis,” in Standard Edition, vol. 20, An Autobiographical Study . . . and Other Works (London, 1959)Google Scholar.

56 Anna Freud to James Strachey, 21 April 1923, P17-F-B-02, British Institute of Psychoanalysis, London (hereafter BIP); Steiner, Riccardo, “A World Wide International Trade Mark of Genuineness? Some Observations on the History of the English Translation of the Work of Sigmund Freud, Focusing Mainly on His Technical Terms,” International Review of Psycho-Analysis 14 (1987): 33–102Google Scholar.

57 Ornston, “Strachey's Influence,” 414.

58 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 23 January 1914, BL Add. MSS 60710, and James Strachey to Charles Scott, 28 January 1916 (draft), BL Add. MSS 60713; Anna Freud to James Strachey, 16 December 1924, P17-F-B-02, BIP.

59 Noel Olivier to James Strachey, 7 July 1920, BL Add. MSS 60686.

60 James Strachey, “Mr. Bennett's ‘Judith,’” Athenaeum (9 May 1919): 310–11; idem, “Rostand and Mr. Loraine,” Athenaeum (11 April 1919): 181–82.

61 Rapp, Dean, “The Early Discovery of Freud by the British General Educated Public, 1912–1919,” Social History of Medicine 3, no. 2 (1990): 230–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Jones, Ernest, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, vol. 3 (New York, 1957), 36Google Scholar.

62 Freud, Sigmund, Sammlung kleiner Schriften zur Neurosenlehre, vol. 2 (Leipzig, 1921), 71Google Scholar; idem, Collected Papers, vol. 3, Case Histories, trans. Alix and Strachey, James (London, 1946 [1925]), 96Google Scholar.

63 Jones, Ernest, ed., Glossary for the Use of Translators of Psycho-Analytical Works (London, 1924)Google Scholar; Strachey, James, “Obituary: Joan Riviere (1883–1962),” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 44 (1963): 229Google Scholar.

64 James Strachey to Alix Strachey, 9 October 1924, in Meisel and Kendrick, Bloomsbury/Freud, 83.

65 Ornston, “Invention of ‘Cathexis’”; Steiner, “A World Wide International Trade Mark of Genuineness?”

66 On the varieties of psychoanalysis in this period, see Raitt, Suzanne, “Early British Psychoanalysis and the Medico-Psychological Clinic,” History Workshop Journal 58 (2004): 63–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Bettelheim, Freud and Man's Soul, 70–78; Strachey, Alix, A New German-English Psycho-Analytical Vocabulary (Baltimore, 1943)Google Scholar, iii, 61.

68 Caine, “Stracheys and Bloomsbury,” 158.

69 James Strachey to Ernest Jones, 27 November 1921, P04-C-E-14, BIP; King, Pearl and Steiner, Riccardo, eds., The Freud–Klein Controversies, 1941–1945 (London, 1991)Google Scholar.

70 Standard Edition, vol. 1, 125n, 344–46; Standard Edition, vol. 19, The Ego and the Id and Other Works (London, 1953), 65Google Scholar; Standard Edition, vol. 2, Studies on Hysteria (London, 1955), xviGoogle Scholar.

71 Forrester, “Freud in Cambridge.”

72 James Strachey to Alix Strachey, 12 March 1925 and 20 May 1925, in Meisel and Kendrick, Bloomsbury/Freud, 232, 270.

73 James Strachey to Alix Strachey, 7 February 1925, 16 May 1925, and 20 May 1925, in Meisel and Kendrick, Bloomsbury/Freud, 197, 266, 270.

74 Standard Edition, vol. 1, 290.

75 Ornston, “Invention of ‘Cathexis,’” 393; Rosenwein, Barbara H., “Worrying about Emotion in History,” American Historical Review 107 (2002): 821–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

76 William Temple, “The Workers' Educational Association” (1908), BL Add. MSS 60672.

77 James Strachey, notes for “Lecture I: Changing People's Minds,” n.d., P17-C-C-01, BIP. Strachey gave a lecture course on the “theory of psycho-analytic technique” in 1932: see the Bulletin of the International Psychoanalytic Association 14 (1933): 294Google Scholar.

78 Standard Edition, vol. 2, xxiii.

79 James Strachey to Alix Strachey, 8 December 1924 and 19 February 1925, in Meisel and Kendrick, Bloomsbury/Freud, 141, 210.

80 James Strachey to Lytton Strachey, 22 April 1921, BL Add. MSS 60712; Standard Edition, vol. 18, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Group Psychology, and Other Works (London, 1955), 68Google Scholar.

81 Standard Edition, vol. 13, Totem and Taboo and Other Works (London, 1955), xiGoogle Scholar; Standard Edition, vol. 22, New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis and Other Works (London, 1964), 4Google Scholar; Standard Edition, vol. 23, Moses and Monotheism, An Outline of Psycho-Analysis, and Other Works (1964), 5.

82 Standard Edition, vol. 18, 95; Freud, Sigmund and Bullitt, William C., Woodrow Wilson: A Psychological Study (New Brunswick, NJ, 1999)Google Scholar. On Freud's animus for Wilson as well as the uncertainty surrounding his collaboration with Bulitt, see Erik H. Erikson, “The Strange Case of Freud, Bulitt, and Woodrow Wilson,” New York Review of Books (9 February 1967).

83 James Strachey to Charles Clark, 25 March 1964, DM1952/02.1735, “Freud General ‘Special’ File (Correspondence)”; Charles Clark memorandum, 7 July 1964, DM1952/643, “Yellow Freud File,” Penguin Archive, University of Bristol. I am indebted to Deborah Cohen for this reference.

84 James Strachey to Alix Strachey, 7 February 1925, in Meisel and Kendrick, Bloomsbury/Freud, 205.

85 Standard Edition, vol. 21, The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and Its Discontents, and Other Works (London, 1961), 60–61Google Scholar. For James Strachey's query and Sigmund and Anna Freud's response regarding the Little Hans translation, see the undated exchange in P17-F-B-02, BIP.

86 Cohen, Deborah, Family Secrets: Shame and Privacy in Modern Britain (New York, 2013), 168–69Google Scholar.

87 This point is well made by Mandler, Peter, Return from the Natives: How Margaret Mead Won the Second World War and Lost the Cold War (New Haven, CT, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 James Strachey to John Hall, 9 September 1957, BL Add. MSS 60716.