Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T22:24:42.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Anglo-Russian Convention and the Problem of Central Asia, 1907–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Ira Klein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For the British, the Anglo-Russian Convention was the culmination of repeated efforts, first begun by Lord Salisbury's government in the 1880s, later reiterated by the ministry of Arthur Balfour after the turn of the century, to come to terms with Russia in Asia. What was the effect on the British position in Asia of the agreement which the Liberal administration of Henry Campbell-Bannerman finally obtained in 1907? The actual working of the Convention in Asia has not received close attention. Since Britain and Russia were wartime allies, it appears to have been taken for granted that, before World War I, the Anglo-Russian Convention produced no major disenchantment or dangers for either partner. One purpose of this essay is to show that for the British, the Convention eventually generated serious dissatisfaction, that it failed to fulfill the British aim of halting Russian expansion in areas strategically crucial to the defense of India, and that in Central Asia after 1912, the Anglo-Russian Convention hindered rather than furthered the British quest for security. Further, a thesis of this paper is that Anglo-Russian relations dominated British policy in Central Asia, and that it was British anxiety about Russian expansion in Central Asia which led the British after 1912 to attempt to establish a veiled protectorate in Tibet. This view diverges from that of a recent major work on the once obscure history of Central Asia: in The McMahon Line, Professor Alastair Lamb emphasized the importance of Sino-Indian relations to the formulation of British policy in Central Asia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , November 1971 , pp. 126 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lamb, Alastair, The McMahon Line, (London, 1966) passimGoogle Scholar.

2. India Office Library, Lytton to Northbrook, Dec. 10, 1876, Lytton Papers.

3. India Office Library, Dufferin to Kimberley, Feb. 3, 1885, Dufferin Papers.

4. Greaves, R. L., Persia and the Defense of India (London, 1959), p. 60Google Scholar.

5. Greaves, R. L., “British Policy in Persia, 1892–1903,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, XXVIII (1965), 302Google Scholar. See also Christ Church, Oxford, Salisbury to O'Connor, Nov. 11, 1896, Salisbury Papers. PRO, Salisbury to Lansdowne, Oct. 15, 1901, Lansdowne Papers.

6. PRO, Spring-Rice to Grey, April 18, 1906, Grey Papers.

7. PRO, Cox to Government of India, June 6, 1908, FO 416, Persia, vol. 37.

8. PRO, Marling to Grey, July 15, 1909, FO 416, vol. 37.

9. PRO, Grey to Buchanan, Nov. 29, 1911; Grey to Buchanan, Dec. 2, 1911, FO 416, vol. 50.

10. PRO, Foreign Office to India Office, March 17, 1913, FO 535, Tibet, vol. 16.

11. PRO, Jordan to Campbell, Feb. 6, 1908, Jordan Papers; PRO, Jordan to Campbell, Dec. 23, 1910, Jordan Papers; PRO, Jordan to Grey, Jan. 11, 1911, Jordan Papers; PRO, Rose to Jordan, Dec. 22, 1909, Alston Papers.

12. Lamb, , McMahon Line, I, 230–32Google Scholar.

13. Lamb, , McMahon Line, II, 226-34, 371-85, 588–89Google Scholar.

14. Ibid., pp. 412-55.

15. Lamb, , McMahon Line, I, 226–34 and passimGoogle Scholar.

16. Ibid., p. 228.

17. Ibid., p. 229.

18. Ibid., p. 231.

19. Ibid.

20. Lamb, , McMahon Line, II, 588Google Scholar.

21. Ibid.

22. Ibid., p. 589.

23. Ibid.

24. Ibid.

25. PRO, Rockhill to Roosevelt, Nov. 8, 1908, FO 535, vol. 12.

26. PRO, Bryce to Grey, Dec. 17, 1908, FO 535, vol. 12.

27. PRO, Muller to Campbell, April 1, 1910, Alston Papers.

28. India Office, Morley to Minto, Jan. 3, 1908, Morley Papers.

29. India Office, Morley to Minto, Jan. 24, 1908, Morley Papers.

30. India Office, Morley to Minto, Feb. 8, 1907, Morley Papers.

31. PRO, Rose to Jordan, Dec. 22, 1909, Alston Papers.

32. India Office, Minto to Morley, July 28, 1910, Morley Papers.

33. PRO, Prince Ching to Jordan, March 31, 1911, FO 535, vol. 14.

34. PRO, Muller to Campbell, April 1, 1910, Alston Papers.

35. PRO, Government of India to Crewe, Sept. 21, 1911, FO 535, vol. 14.

36. Lamb, , McMahon Line, II, 416–17Google Scholar.

37. PRO, Government of India to Crewe, Sept. 21, 1911, FO 535, vol. 14; PRO, Jordan to Grey, April 12, 1912, FO 535, vol. 15; PRO, Jordan to Grey, Aug. 14, 1912, FO 535, vol. 15; India Office Library, Minto to Morley, Jan. 21, 1909, Morley Papers; PRO, Campbell to Jordan, March 31, 1911, Jordan Papers; Cambridge University Library, Telegraphic corr., Viceroy to Secretary of State, Nov. 8, 1911, Hardinge Papers.

38. PRO, Jordan to Langley, June 25, 1912, Jordan Papers.

39. PRO, Jordan to Langley, Nov. 13, 1912, Jordan Papers.

40. PRO, Jordan to Campbell, Nov. 3, 1911, Jordan Papers.

41. PRO, Jordan to Langley, June 25, 1912, Jordan Papers.

42. Ibid.

43. Ibid.

44. PRO, Langley to Jordan, Oct. 25, 1912, Jordan Papers.

45. Cambridge University Library, Memo, by Viceroy, Feb. 1, 1911, Hardinge Papers.

46. Cambridge University Library, Hardinge to Meyer, May 18, 1912, Hardinge Papers.

47. Monger, G. W., The End of Isolation (London, 1963) pp. 56-57, 61, 180–83Google Scholar.

48. Cambridge University Library, Hardinge to Meyer, May 18, 1912, Hardinge Papers.

49. PRO, Cartwright to Grey, Oct. 5, 1910, FO 421, Southeast Europe, vol. 265; PRO, Buchanan to Grey, March 5, 1912, FO 421, vol. 280; Cooper, M. B., “British Policy in the Balkans,” Historical Journal, VII (1964), pp. 258–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50. PRO, Jordan to Grey, Jan. 11, 1911, Alston Papers.

51. PRO, Jordan to Campbell, March 16, 1911, Jordan Papers.

52. PRO, Campbell to Jordan, March 17, 1911, Jordan Papers.

53. PRO, Jordan to Grey, March 6, 1913, FO 535, vol. 16.

54. Ibid.

55. Ibid.

56. PRO, Government of India to Crewe, July 27, 1912, FO 535, vol. 15.

57. PRO, “Memo. Regarding … Tibet Conference, Oct. 6 - Nov. 23, 1913,” FO 535, vol. 16.

58. Cambridge University Library, Hardinge to Crewe, Dec. 11, 1913, Hardinge Papers.

59. Cambridge University Library, Crewe to Hardinge, Dec. 14, 1913, Hardinge Papers.

60. PRO, Jordan to Grey, March 6, 1913, FO 535, vol. 16.

61. PRO, Bell to Government of India, March 29, 1911, FO 535, vol. 14; PRO, Jordan to Langley, Nov. 30, 1913, Jordan Papers; PRO, Jordan to Grey, March 6, 1913, FO 535, vol. 15; PRO, Jordan to Grey, March 10, 1913, FO 535, vol. 15; Cambridge University Library, Hardinge to Crewe, Dec. 11, 1913, Hardinge Papers.

62. PRO, “Memo. Regarding the … Tibet Conferences, Oct. 6 - Nov. 13, 1913” FO 535, vol. 16; PRO, Final Memo., enclosed in Hardinge to Crewe, July 23, 1914, FO 535, vol. 17.

63. PRO, Final Memo., enclosed in Hardinge to Crewe, July 23, 1914, FO 535, vol. 17.

64. Cambridge University Library, telegraphic corr., Viceroy to Secretary of State, June 21, 1914, Hardinge Papers.

65. Lamb, , McMahon Line, II, 507Google Scholar.

66. PRO, Buchanan to Grey, May 17, 1914, FO 535, vol. 17; PRO, Buchanan to Grey, May 19, 1914, FO 535, vol. 17.

67. PRO, Grey to Buchanan, June 6, 1914, FO 535, vol. 17.

68. PRO, Buchanan to Grey, May 17, 1914, FO 535, vol. 17; PRO, Buchanan to Grey, May 19, 1914, FO 535, vol. 17.

69. Cambridge University Library, Crewe to Hardinge, Oct. 3, 1912, Hardinge Papers.

70. Kazemzadeh, Firuz, Russia and Britain in Persia (New Haven, 1968), pp. 338–39Google Scholar.

71. Pierce, R. A., Russian Central Asia, 1867–1917 (Berkeley, 1960), p. 109Google Scholar.

72. Entner, M. L., Russo-Persian Commercial Relations, 1828–1944 (Gainesville, 1965), pp. 3-9, 69–76Google Scholar.

73. PRO, Macleay to Jordan, Oct. 1, 1917, Jordan Papers; PRO, Jordan to Macleay, April 6, 1918, Jordan Papers. For the Anglo-Japanese problem, see Klein, Ira, “The British Decline in Asia; Tibet, 1914–21,” The Historian, Nov., 1971Google Scholar.