Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:55:43.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

James I and the Historians: Toward a Reconsideration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Marc L. Schwarz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 1974 , pp. 114 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. This is a slightly revised version of a paper delivered at the annual meeting of the New England Branch of the Conference on British Studies in Boston, Massachusetts on May 6, 1972.

2. Willson, D. H., King James VI and I (London, 1956), p. 242Google Scholar.

3. Macaulay, T. B., The History of England from the Accession of James II (London, 1858), I, 76Google Scholar.

4. Trevor-Roper, H. R., “James I and his Bishops,” in Historical Essays (London, 1957), pp. 131–32Google Scholar.

5. SirWeldon, Anthony, The Court and Character of King James (London, 1650)Google Scholar reprinted in its 1651 ed. in SirScott, Walter (ed.), Secret History of the Court of James the First (Edinborough, 1811), I, 298–482Google Scholar. See also Weldon's brief character study of James in ibid., II, 1-12.

6. Wilson, Arthur, The History of Great Britain, Being the Life and Reign of King James the First (London, 1653)Google Scholar. A good selection of contemporary views of James I may be conveniently found in Ashton, Robert (ed.), James I by his Contemporaries (London, 1969)Google Scholar. Professor Ashton's commentary is generally unfavorable to King James.

7. See SirScott's, WalterSecret History and his novel The Fortunes of Nigel (1822)Google Scholar. For modern criticism of Scott, see Carter, Charles H., The Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs 1598-1625 (New York, 1964), pp. 110–11Google Scholar.

8. Gardiner's conclusion that the reign was disastrous may be found in Gardiner, S. R., History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War 1603-1642 (London, 1894–1896), V, 316Google Scholar. But here (V, 315-16) and elsewhere (I, 48-49) Gardiner takes a not unsympathetic approach to the King's character and aims. Moreover, anyone who reads Gardiner's volumes on the reign of James I will find other examples of his recognition that James had certain abilities.

9. Tanner, J. R., English Constitutional Conflicts of the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, 1928), p. 51Google Scholar. Like Gardiner, however, Tanner has some very interesting and illuminating things to say in defense of James (pp. 1-50).

10. Trevelyan, G. M., England under the Stuarts (21st ed.; London, 1949), pp. 60-63 and 106–07Google Scholar.

11. Notestein, Wallace, The English People on the Eve of Colonization 1603-1630 (New York, 1954), pp. 172–78Google Scholar.

12. Davies, Godfrey, “The Character of James VI and I,” Huntington Library Quarterly, V (October, 1941), 33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. Willson, , King James VI and I, pp. 222, 273 and 420Google Scholar.

14. Curtis, Mark H., “Hampton Court Conference and its Aftermath,” History, XLVI (Feb., 1961), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. Babbage, Stuart, Puritanism and Richard Bancroft (London, 1962)Google Scholar.

16. Carter, , Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs, esp. pp. 109–19Google Scholar.

17. Willson, D. H., A History of England (New York, 1967), pp. 354–76Google Scholar.

18. Kenyon, J. P., The Stuarts (London, 1958), pp. 39–72Google Scholar.

19. Kenyon, J. P. (ed.), The Stuart Constitution (Cambridge, 1966)Google Scholar.

20. Akrigg, G. P. V., Jacobean Pageant (Cambridge, Mass., 1963)Google Scholar.

21. Mathew, David, James I (London, 1967)Google Scholar.

22. Goodman, G., The Court of King James I, ed. Brewer, J. S. (London, 1839)Google Scholar.

23. SirSanderson, William, A Compleat History of the Lives and Reigns of Mary Queen of Scotland and of her Son … James the Sixth (London, 1656)Google Scholar.

24. SirD'Ewes, Simonds, The Autobiography of Sir Simonds D'Ewes, ed. Halliwell, J. O. (London, 1845), I, 264–65Google Scholar.

25. Fuller, Thomas, The Church History of Britain, ed. Brewer, J. S. (Oxford, 1845), V, 386Google Scholar.

26. Ibid., V, 572-73. I am indebted for these references from Fuller to Professor W. Brown Patterson of Davidson College who kindly provided me with a copy of his paper, “Thomas Fuller's Interpretation of the English Revolution,” which was presented at the December, 1971 meeting of the American Historical Association in New York City. Fuller's view of James is discussed on pp. 3-4. Patterson notes (p. 3) that Fuller thought “James I … a remarkably successful king.”

27. Curtis, , “Hampton Court Conference,” History, XLVI, 1–12Google Scholar.

28. Ibid., pp. 13-15.

29. Despite James's tirades against “Puritans,” it seems to me that he generally meant those who favored “parity” or engaged in sedition. Unlike McIlwain, I do not believe the King was necessarily being hypocritical in this regard. See Mcllwain's, C. H. introduction in The Political Works of James I (Cambridge, Mass., 1918), p. xciGoogle Scholar. In fact, most Puritans themselves opposed the same groups.

30. Babbage, , Puritanism and Richard Bancroft, pp. 147–219Google Scholar.

31. See Curtis, , “Hampton Court Conference,” History, XLVI, 9Google Scholar; Kenyon, , Stuart Constitution, p. 127Google Scholar.

32. Marchant, Ronald, The Puritans and the Church Courts in the Diocese of York 1590-1642 (London, 1960), p. 29Google Scholar.

33. Trevor-Roper, , “James I and his Bishops,” Historical Essays, pp. 135–36Google Scholar.

34. For Abbott, see Welsby, Paul, George Abbott the Unwanted Archbishop 1562-1633 (London, 1962)Google Scholar.

35. Ibid., p. 37. See also Welsby, Paul, Lancelot Andrewes 1555-1626 (London, 1958), pp. 111–12Google Scholar.

36. Russell, Conrad, The Crisis of Parliaments: English History 1509-1660 (Oxford, 1971), p. 280Google Scholar.

37. Kautz, Arthur B., “The Selection of Jacobean Bishops,” in Early Stuart Studies: Essays in Honor of David Harris Willson, ed. Reinmuth, H. R. Jr. (Minneapolis, 1970), pp. 152-79, esp. 156–57Google Scholar.

38. Parker, T. M., “Arminianism and Laudianism in Seventeenth Century England,” in Studies in Church History, eds. Dugmore, C. W. and Duggan, C. (London, 1964), I, 31Google Scholar.

39. I am referring here, among others, to the Millenary Petition of 1603 and the Petition on Religion of 1610. For these documents, see Tanner, J. R. (ed.), Constitutional Documents of the Reign of James I (Cambridge, 1930), pp. 13-14, 77–80Google Scholar.

40. Lamont, William, Marginal Prynne (London, 1963), pp. 13-14, 20–22Google Scholar.

41. There is a very good short analysis of this point in Russell, , Crisis of Parliaments, pp. 210–17Google Scholar. Russell's account is based upon Tyacke, N. R. N., “Arminianism in England in Religion and Politics, 1604-1640” (Oxford University, D. Phil, thesis, 1968)Google Scholar. See ibid., p. 211 n. 83.

42. See Parker, , “Arminianism and Laudianism in Seventeenth Century England,” Studies in Church History, pp. 23–24Google Scholar, and Schriver, F., “Orthodoxy and Diplomacy: James I and the Vorstius Affair,” E.H.R., LXXXV (July, 1970), 452–53Google Scholar.

43. On the Vorstius affair see Schriver, , “Orthodoxy,” E.H.R., LXXXVGoogle Scholar. Also see Harrison, A. W., The Beginnings of Arminianism to the Synod of Dort (London, 1926), pp. 164–89Google Scholar. Harrison's account is now superseded by Schriver's careful research.

44. For the Synod of Dort see Harrison, , Beginnings of Arminianism, pp. 300–83Google Scholar.

45. Willson, , King lames VI and I, p. 400Google Scholar.

46. Welsby, , Lancelot Andrewes, pp. 166–67Google Scholar.

47. An interesting question, however, is why James supported the Arminian Richard Montagu in 1624 when the cleric was attacked in Parliament and opposed by Archbishop Abbot for his outspoken views. See Russell, , Crisis of Parliaments, pp. 213–14Google Scholar. One may hope that Dr. Tyacke's long-awaited study will illuminate this point.

48. Curtis, Mark H., Oxford and Cambridge in Transition 1558-1642 (Oxford, 1959), pp. 207–08Google Scholar. For a contemporary picture of the Calvinist atmosphere of Jacobean Cambridge, see Marsden, J. H. (ed.), College Life in the Time of James I as Illustrated by an Unpublished Diary of Sir Symonds D'Ewes (London, 1851)Google Scholar.

49. For Preston and the Puritan circle at the court of James I, see Morgan, I., Prince Charles's Puritan Chaplain (London, 1957)Google Scholar.

50. Hexter, Jack H., The Reign of King Pym (Cambridge, Mass., 1941), p. 198Google Scholar n. 11.

51. Rous, Francis, The Diseases of the Time (London, 1622)Google Scholar, preface *A6-*A6v.

52. Ibid., pp. 477, 486-89.

53. Rous, Francis, Testis Veritatis (London, 1626)Google Scholar, title page. For additional praise from Caroline Puritans of James's dedication to true doctrine, see Prynne, William, Anti Arminianism (London, 1630), pp. 88–89Google Scholar, and Bastwick, John, The Answer of John Bastwick … to the Information of Sir John Bancks (1637), pp. 20–21Google Scholar.

54. Collinson, Patrick, The Elizabethan Puritan Movement (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967), pp. 449-50, 460Google Scholar. See also Russell, , The Crisis of Parliaments, p. 262Google Scholar.

55. McIlwain, , Political Works of James I, p. xcGoogle Scholar. Moreover, any reader of James's works against Rome will note their strong emphasis on the royal supremacy.

56. Curtis, , “Hampton Court Conference and its Aftermath,” History, XLVI, 4–9Google Scholar.

57. Collinson, , Elizabethan Puritan Movement, pp. 458, 460Google Scholar.

58. Welsby, , Lancelot Andrewes, p. 111Google Scholar. For the King's view of Laud, see Willson, , King James VI and I, p. 400Google Scholar.

59. Parker, , “Arminianism and Laudianism in Seventeenth Century England,” Studies in Church History, pp. 31–33Google Scholar and, more importantly, Parker, William, Godly Rule (London, 1959), pp. 35–42Google Scholar. Lamont makes the interesting point that the theory of divine right episcopacy may have been a device developed by the bishops as a consequence of fear of James's Scottish background and his actions at the Hampton Court Conference.

60. For an illuminating example of Charles's readiness to permit independent action by Archbishop Laud even at the risk of diminishing his prerogative, see Curtis, , Oxford and Cambridge in Transition, pp. 32–34Google Scholar. On Charles's limited view of the royal supremacy see Lamont, , Marginal Prynne, p. 18Google Scholar.

61. Mattingly, Garrett, Renaissance Diplomacy (Boston, 1955), pp. 255–68Google Scholar.

62. Jones, J. R., Britain and Europe in the Seventeenth Century (London, 1966), pp. 14–20Google Scholar.

63. Carter, Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs and Carter, Charles H., “Gondomar: Ambassador to James I,” The Historical Journal, VII (1964), 189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64. Jones, , Britain and Europe, pp. 14–15Google Scholar; Carter, , Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs, p. 60Google Scholar.

65. Jones, , Britain and Europe, p. 17Google Scholar.

66. Carter, , Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs, pp. 47–48Google Scholar. Jones also notes the danger from France, (Britain and Europe, p. 16)Google Scholar.

67. Carter, , Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs, pp. 47–49Google Scholar.

68. Ibid., pp. 26, 214-215; Jones, , Britain and Europe, pp. 16–17Google Scholar.

69. Jones, , Britain and Europe, p. 17Google Scholar. See also Schriver, , “Orthodoxy,” E.H.R., LXXXVGoogle Scholar, and Lee, Maurice Jr., “The Jacobean Diplomatic Service,” A.H.R., LXXII (July, 1967), 1269–72Google Scholar.

70. Lee, Maurice Jr., James I and Henri IV (Urbana, 1970)Google Scholar.

71. Jones, , Britain and Europe, p. 17Google Scholar.

72. Lee, , James I and Henri IV, pp. 176–79Google Scholar.

73. Carter, , “Gondomar,” The Historical Journal, VIIGoogle Scholar, and Carter, , Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs, pp. 120–33Google Scholar.

74. Carter, , Secret Diplomacy of the Hapsburgs, p. 133Google Scholar.

75. Gardiner, , History of England, V, 134–60Google Scholar.

76. Ruigh, Robert, The Parliament of 1624 (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), pp. 152, 385Google Scholar.

77. Judson, Margaret, The Crisis of the Constitution (New Brunswick, 1949), pp. 17–34Google Scholar; Greenleaf, W. H., “James I and the Divine Right of Kings,” Political Studies, V (Feb., 1957), 36–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Greenleaf, W. H., Order, Empiricism and Politics (Oxford, 1964), pp. 58–67Google Scholar; Ritter, G., “Divine Right and Prarogative der englischen Könige 1603-1640,” Historische Zeitschrift, CXCVI (1963), 584–625Google Scholar.

78. Wormuth, Francis, The Royal Prerogative 1603-1649 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1939), pp. 85–86Google Scholar.

79. Sisson, C. J., “King James the First of England as Poet and Political Writer,” in Seventeenth Century Studies Presented to Sir Herbert Grierson, ed. Wilson, J. Dover (Oxford, 1938), pp. 47–63Google Scholar.

80. Judson, , Crisis of the Constitution, p. 44Google Scholar; Wormuth, , Royal Prerogative, p. 92Google Scholar.

81. Wormuth, , Royal Prerogative, p. 93Google Scholar.

82. Kenyon, , Stuart Constitution, p. 8Google Scholar.

83. Notestein, W., The House of Commons 1604-1610 (New Haven, 1971)Google Scholar.

84. Moir, T. L., The Addled Parliament of 1614 (Oxford, 1958)Google Scholar.

85. Zaller, R., The Parliament of 1621 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1971)Google Scholar.

86. A complete citation for Ruigh's monograph is given in footnote 76. Theodore K. Rabb has provided an informative review of the studies by Notestein, Zaller and Ruigh in his “Parliament and Society in Early Stuart England: The Legacy of Wallace Notestein,” A.H.R., LXXVII (June, 1972), 705–14Google Scholar.

87. Foster, E. R. (ed.), Proceedings in Parliament 1610 (New Haven, 1966)Google Scholar.

88. Notestein, W., “The Winning of the Initiative by the House of Commons,” Proceedings of the British Academy, XI (1924), 125–75Google Scholar.

89. Willson, D. H., The Privy Councillors in the House of Commons 1604-1629 (Minneapolis, 1940)Google Scholar.

90. Elton, G. R., “A High Road to Civil War?” in From the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation: Essays in Honor of Garrett Mattingly, ed. Carter, Charles H. (New York, 1965), pp. 325–47Google Scholar.

91. Judson, , Crisis of the Constitution, pp. 235–37Google Scholar. Another illuminating example of this parliamentary attitude is provided by the Petition of Right of 1610 as described by Hinton, R. W. K. in “Government and Liberty under James I,” Cambridge Historical Journal, XI (1953), 48–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Hinton makes the point that while the Petition does reflect the awareness of a possible future threat of despotism in England arising out of the enlargement of the prerogative, the major concern was not to limit strong executive power, but rather to direct it through established and legal channels.

92. Zaller, , The Parliament of 1621, pp. 177–84Google Scholar.

93. Ruigh, , The Parliament of 1624, pp. 156Google Scholar n. 13, 172-74, and 382-85.

94. Foster, , Proceedings in Parliament 1610, I, xix–xxGoogle Scholar.

95. Russell, , Crisis of Parliaments, pp. 292–97Google Scholar.

96. Calendar of State Papers, Venetian, 1636-1639, 16 June 1637, p. 124Google Scholar, quoted in Rowe, V. A., “Robert, Second Earl of Warwick and the Payment of Ship-Money in Essex,” Transactions of the Essex Archaeological Society I, Pt. 2, 3rd Series (1962), p. 162Google Scholar.

97. Donaldson, Gordon, Scotland James V-James VII (Edinburgh, 1965), pp. 214–15Google Scholar.

98. Ibid., p. 237.

99. Ibid., pp. 206-07.

100. Ibid., pp. 209-10.

101. Ibid., p. 211.

102. Ashton, R., The Crown and the Money Market 1603-1640 (Oxford, 1960)Google Scholar.

103. Tawney, R. H., Business and Politics under James I (Cambridge, 1958)Google Scholar.

104. Prestwich, M., Cranfield (Oxford, 1966)Google Scholar.

105. See Stone, Lawrence, The Crisis of the Aristocracy 1558-1641 (Oxford, 1965), pp. 65–128Google Scholar.

106. Elton, , “High Road to Civil War?” pp. 326–27Google Scholar.

107. Hill, C., Century of Revolution, 1603-1714 (London, 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

108. Aylmer, G. E., The Struggle for the Constitution, 1603-1689 (New York, 1963)Google Scholar. Also published in the United States under the title A Short History of 17th Century England 1603-1689 (New York, 1963)Google Scholar.

109. Lockyer, R., Tudor and Stuart Britain 1471-1714 (New York, 1964)Google Scholar.

110. Russell, Crisis of Parliaments.

111. McElwee, W., The Wisest Fool in Christendom (New York, 1958)Google Scholar.