5. Boyle, Robert, A Discourse of Things above Reason. Inquiring Whether a Philosopher should admit there are any such (London, 1681)Google Scholar. B., R., Sir Isaac Newton's Account of the Æther (Dublin, 1745)Google Scholar; the following works by Sir Isaac Newton: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, ed. Hutchins, R. M. [Great Books of the Western World, XXXIV] (Chicago, 1952)Google Scholar; Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, ed. and tr. Hall, A. R. and Hall, Marie B. (Cambridge, 1962)Google Scholar; Pour Letters to Doctor Bentley. Containing Some Arguments in Proof of a Deity (London, 1756)Google Scholar; Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy, ed. Cohen, Bernard (Cambridge, 1958)Google Scholar. Bentley, Richard, The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism … in Eight Sermons (London, 1693)Google Scholar, and A Confutation of Atheism from the Structure and Origin of Humane Bodies (London, 1692)Google Scholar. Newton and Bentley specifically address themselves to Epicurus's deficiencies, Newton concentrating on those of hypothesis and Bentley on those of logic. See Newton, , Pour Letters, p. 25Google Scholar; Bentley, , The Folly of Atheism, Sermon I, pp. 7–8Google Scholar. Evelyn, in his long unpublished History of Religion, similarly attacked Epicurean thought, though he had earlier translated Epicurus's writings. See Evelyn, John, The History of Religion. A Rational Account of the True Religion (London, 1850), II, 174–78Google Scholar. Cf. the attitudes toward Epicurus espoused by John Dryden, Walter Charleton, the Earl of Clarendon, and Sir William Temple. Cf. Johnson, , English Neo-Classical Thought, pp. 82–85Google Scholar.