Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T19:38:45.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's understanding of indirect requests: comparing child and adult comprehension*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Patricia L. Carrell
Patricia L. Carrell
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on Clark & Lucy's (1975) study of adult comprehension of different types of indirect requests, this study addresses the questions: ‘How well are children aged 4 to 7 able to understand these same indirect requests?’ and ‘How does the relation between request type and ease of comprehension compare from children to adults?’ Results showed: (1) these children are able to comprehend a wide variety of indirect requests; (2) there is a general developmental pattern of acquisition; (3) interrogative forms are more difficult than declarative forms; (4) conveyed negative requests are more difficult than corresponding conveyed positive requests; (5) children are heavily influenced by the surface polarity of the conveyed request; and (6) the relationship between request type and ease of comprehension is strikingly similar for both children and adults.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 329 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. MPQ 21. 205–26.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. CogPsych 11. 430–77.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. CogPsych 3. 472–517.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1974). Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions. Memory & Cognition 2. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Lucy, P. (1975). Understanding what is meant from what is said: a study in conversationally conveyed requests. JVLVB 14. 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language development. JPsycholingRes 4. 343–50.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1974). The comprehension and production of requests by children. PRCLD 8. 188–95.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1977). Wait for me, roller stake! In Ervin-Tripp, S. & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (eds), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and responses in children's speech. JChLang 2. 41–63.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1979) Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests. Discourse Processes 2. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. & Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational postulates. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 63–84.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3. Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. & Kernan, K. T. (1977). Pragmatics of directive choice among children. In Ervin-Tripp, S. & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (eds), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 9. Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Munro, A. (1979). Indirect speech acts are not strictly conventional. LI 10. 353–6.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1970). Whimperatives. In Sadock, J. & Vanek, A. (eds), Studies presented to R. B. Lees by his students. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1972). Speech act idioms. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 329–39.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1974). Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3. Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1974). The comprehension of indirect directives. Can two-year-olds shut the door? Paper presented at Summer LSA Meeting,Amherst., Mass.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1978). On the development of communicative understandings: an early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. CogPsych 10. 271–301.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Tenenhaus, M. K., Carroll, J. M. & Bever, T. G. (1976). Sentence–picture verification models as theories of sentence comprehension: a critique of Carpenter and Just. PsychRev 83. 310–17.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T. (1972). Mental operations in language comprehension. In Carroll, J. B. & Freedle, R. O. (eds), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, D.C.: Winston.Google Scholar
Willbrand, M. L. & Geery, C. (1979). Sentence types in children's requests. In Haller, R. (ed.), Papers from the 1979 Mid-America Linguistics Conference. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar