Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-z9m8x Total loading time: 0.514 Render date: 2022-10-01T09:56:25.775Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Effects of age and stimulus material on character introductions of Swedish-speaking four- to six-year-olds*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2017

JOSEFIN LINDGREN*
Affiliation:
Uppsala University, Sweden
*
Address for correspondence: Josefin Lindgren, Uppsala University, Department of Linguistics and Philology, Box 635, 751 26 Uppsala, Sweden. e-mail: josefin.lindgren@lingfil.uu.se

Abstract

This study investigates effects of age on character introductions in the oral narratives of seventy-two monolingual Swedish-speaking four- to six-year-olds, comparing results from the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (MAIN; Gagarina et al., 2012, 2015), and the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument (ENNI; Schneider et al., 2005). The proportion of appropriate referring expressions for introducing story characters clearly increases from age four to six. However, the children's performance is strongly stimulus-dependent. All age groups perform better on MAIN than on ENNI. One should thus be careful when drawing conclusions about the age at which children are able to use referring expressions appropriately.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The author is grateful to Ute Bohnacker and Jorrig Vogels, the members of the Uppsala University empirical linguistics reading group, two anonymous reviewers, and the editors for valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper; to the children who participated in the study and their parents; and to the preschool teachers who helped recruiting the children.

References

REFERENCES

Aksu-Koç, A. & Nicolopoulou, A. (2015). Character reference in young children's narratives: a crosslinguistic comparison of English, Greek, and Turkish. Lingua 155, 6284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S. E. M., Skarabela, B. & Hughes, M. (2008). Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. In Behrens, H. (ed.), Trends in language acquisition research (Vol. 6, pp. 99137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E. (2008). Reference production: production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4), 495527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.) (1994). Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, U. (2003). Nominal phrases. In Josefsson, G., Platzack, C. & Håkansson, G. (eds), The acquisition of Swedish grammar, 195260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, U. (2007). The role of input frequency in article acquisition in early child Swedish. In Gülzow, I. & Gagarina, N. (eds), Frequency effects in language acquisition: defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept, 5182. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 2555. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Cat, C. (2013). Egocentric definiteness errors and perspective evaluation in preschool children. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 5869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emslie, H. C. & Stevenson, R. J. (1981). Pre-school children's use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions. Journal of Child Language 8(2), 313–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagarina, N., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., Tantele, K., Välimaa, T., Balčiūnienė, I., Bohnacker, U. & Walters, J. (2012). MAIN: Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 56, 1155.Google Scholar
Gagarina, N., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., Tantele, K., Välimaa, T., Balčiūnienė, I., Bohnacker, U. & Walters, J. (2015). Assessment of narrative abilities in bilingual children. In Armon-Lotem, S., de Jong, J. & Meir, N. (eds), Assessing multilingual children, 243–69. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K. (2010). Reference and accessibility from a givenness hierarchy perspective. International Review of Pragmatics 2(2), 148–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2), 274307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K. & Johnson, K. (2013). Children's use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: implications for theory of mind development. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 4357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Roland, F. & Liang, J. (1996). The marking of new information in children's narratives: a comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language 23(3), 591619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M. E. & Allen, S. E. M. (2013). The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kail, M. & Hickmann, M. (1992). French children's ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language 12(34), 7394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kail, M. & Sanchez y Lopez, I. (1997). Referent introductions in Spanish narratives as a function of contextual constraints: a crosslinguistic perspective. First Language 17(51), 103–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küntay, A. C. (2002). Development of the expression of indefiniteness: presenting new referents in Turkish picture-series stories. Discourse Processes 33(1), 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. (1993). Referential structure in Japanese children's narratives: the acquisition of wa and ga. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3, 8499.Google Scholar
Schneider, P., Dubé, R. V. & Hayward, D. (2005). The Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument. Edmonton: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Schneider, P. & Hayward, D. (2010). Who does what to whom: introduction of referents in children's storytelling from pictures. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 41(4), 459–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, P., Rivard, R. & Debreuil, B. (2011). Does colour affect the quality or quantity of children's stories elicited by pictures? Child Language Teaching and Therapy 27(3), 371–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L. (2007). Referential cohesion in the narratives of bilingual English–Italian children and monolingual peers. Journal of Pragmatics 39(6), 1058–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. R. & Hudson, J. A. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: coherence and cohesion in young children's picture-elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology 27(6), 960–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B., Allen, S. E. M. & Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2013). Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, N. L. & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In Freedle, R. (ed.), Discourse processing: multidisciplinary perspectives, 53120. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Teleman, U., Hellberg, S. & Andersson, E. (1999). Svenska Akademiens grammatik. Part 3. Stockholm: Norstedts Ordbok.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warden, D. A. (1976). The influence of context on children's use of identifying expression and references. British Journal of Psychology 67(1), 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. (1990). Children's narrative acquisition: a study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First Language 10(29), 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Effects of age and stimulus material on character introductions of Swedish-speaking four- to six-year-olds*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Effects of age and stimulus material on character introductions of Swedish-speaking four- to six-year-olds*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Effects of age and stimulus material on character introductions of Swedish-speaking four- to six-year-olds*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *