Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T03:13:03.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How children aged 2;6 tailor verbal expressions to interlocutor informational needs*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

KIRSTEN ABBOT-SMITH*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Kent, UK
ERIKA NURMSOO
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Kent, UK
REBECCA CROLL
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Kent, UK
HEATHER FERGUSON
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Kent, UK
MICHAEL FORRESTER
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Kent, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Kirsten Abbot-Smith, School of Psychology, University of Kent, Keynes College, Canterbury CT2 7NP, UK. e-mail: K.Abbot-Smith@kent.ac.uk

Abstract

Although preschoolers are pervasively underinformative in their actual usage of verbal reference, a number of studies have shown that they nonetheless demonstrate sensitivity to listener informational needs, at least when environmental cues to this are obvious. We investigated two issues. The first concerned the types of visual cues to interlocutor informational needs which children aged 2;6 can process whilst producing complex referring expressions. The second was whether performance in experimental tasks related to naturalistic conversational proficiency. We found that 2;6-year-olds used fewer complex expressions when the objects were dissimilar compared to highly similar objects, indicating that they tailor their verbal expressions to the informational needs of another person, even when the cue to the informational need is relatively opaque. We also found a correlation between conversational skills as rated by the parents and the degree to which 2;6-year-olds could learn from feedback to produce complex referring expressions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Many thanks to Carly Rother and Louise Schwartz for collecting the data, to the parents and children of the Kent Child Development Unit for giving up their time, and to Bernice Anum for coding reliabilities and LUI data entry. This study was funded by the School of Psychology, University of Kent, UK.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C., Gaile, J., Lockton, E. & Freed, J. (2011). Targeted observation of pragmatics in children's conversations (TOPICC): adapting a research tool into a clinical assessment profile. Speech and Language Therapy in Practice, 710.Google Scholar
Adams, C., Green, J., Gilchrist, A. & Cox, A. (2002). Conversational behavior of children with Asperger syndrome and conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 43(5), 679690.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 390412.Google Scholar
Bahtiyar, S. & Küntay, A. C. (2009). Integration of communicative partner's visual perspective in patterns of referential requests. Journal of Child Language 36, 529554.Google Scholar
Begeer, S., Malle, B., Nieuwland, M. & Keysar, B. (2010). Using Theory of Mind to represent and take part in social interactions: comparing individuals with high-functioning autism and typically developing controls. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 7(1), 104122.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. & Adams, C. (1991). What do referential communication tasks measure? A study of children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 199215.Google Scholar
Brandt, S. (2011). Learning from social interaction: the form and function of relative clauses in discourse and experimental studies with children. In Kidd, E. (ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: processing, typology and function (pp. 6179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective-taking during on-line language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 16, 893900.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J. & Hix, H. R. (1998). The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief. Child Development 69, 672691.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, W. & Pechmann, T. (1982). Social-interaction and the development of definite descriptions. Cognition 11(2), 159184.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., Slevc, L. R. & Rogers, E. S. (2005). How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions? Cognition 96, 263284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillis, R. & Nilsen, E. (2014). Cognitive flexibility supports pre-schoolers’ detection of communicative ambiguity. First Language 34(1), 5871.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. & Krauss, R. (1967). What do people say after they have learned how to talk? Studies of the development of referential communication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 13, 309316.Google Scholar
Graf, E. & Davies, C. (2014). The production and comprehension of referring expressions. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 161181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. & Allen, S. (2013). The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 1530.Google Scholar
Liebal, K., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2010). Infants' use of shared experience in declarative pointing. Infancy 15, 545556.Google Scholar
Lin, S., Keysar, B. & Epley, N. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(3), 551556.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. & Banham, L. (1997). Does drawing attention to the referent constrain the way in which children construct verbal messages? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26, 509518.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Butcher, J., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2012) Two- and four-year-olds learn to adapt referring expressions to context: effects of distracters and feedback on referential communication. TopiCS 4, 184210.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. E., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2007). How toddlers and preschoolers learn to uniquely identify referents for others: a training study. Child Development 78(6), 17441759.Google Scholar
Moll, H., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2007). Fourteen-month-olds know what others experience only in joint engagement with them. Developmental Science 10(6), 826835.Google Scholar
Nilsen, E. & Graham, S. (2009). The relations between children's communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology 58, 220249.Google Scholar
Norbury, C. (2014). Practitioner review: social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 55, 204216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, D. K. (1996). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests. Child Development 67, 659677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, D. K. (2009). Language use inventory. Waterloo, Canada: Knowledge in Development, Inc. Google Scholar
O'Neill, D. K. & Topolovec, J. (2001). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to the referential (in)efficacy of their own pointing gestures. Journal of Child Language 28, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resches, M. & Perez Pereira, M. (2007). Referential communication abilities and theory of mind development in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 34, 2152.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J. & Robinson, W. P. (1985). Teaching children about verbal referential communication. International Journal of Behavioral Development 8, 285299.Google Scholar
Rossnagel, C. (2004). Lost in thought: cognitive load and the processing of addressees’ feedback in verbal communication. Experimental Psychology 51, 191200.Google Scholar
Salomo, D., Graf, E., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2010). The role of perceptual availability and discourse context in young children's question answering. Journal of Child Language 38(4), 918931.Google Scholar
Santiesteban, I., Shah, P, White, S., Bird, G. & Heyes, C. M. (2015). Mentalizing or submentalizing in a communication task? Evidence from autism and a camera control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22, 844849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saylor, M., Baird, J. & Gallerani, C. (2006). Telling others what's new: preschoolers’ adherence to the given–new contract. Journal of Cognition and Development 7(3): 341379.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax–pragmatics interface: subjects and objects in English–Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition . Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(3), 183205.Google Scholar
Shwe, H. I. & Markman, E. M. (1997) Young children's appreciation of the mental impact of their communicative signals. Developmental Psychology 33(4), 630636.Google Scholar
Vurpillot, E. (1968). The development of scanning strategies and their relation to visual differentiation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 6(4), 632650.Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G., Sonnenschein, S. & Ianfolla, B. (1981). Learning to communicate from models: children confuse length with information. Child Development 52, 507513.Google Scholar