Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T17:57:43.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is early pragmatic development measurable?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Philip S. Dale
Philip S. Dale
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measures of pragmatic development for children in the second year of life were developed, based on a brief (30 minute) language sample and on structured elicitation conditions. When age is partialled out, number of pragmatic functions expressed is not statistically related to MLU, due to the fact that the number of functions grows steadily during the one-word and very early two-word phases. Performance on the structured imperative tasks also reflects development during this period, though performance on the declarative tasks does not. We conclude that the range of pragmatic functions in the second year is measurable and contributes information not provided by a measure of syntactic development such as MLU. Such information should prove useful for research on language and cognition in normal and language-impaired children.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

A portion of the research reported here was presented at the First International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Tokyo, August 1978. This research was supported by Research Contract HD-3-2793 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, entitled ‘An Investigation of Certain Relationships between Hearing Impairment and Language Disability’, and by the Child Development and Mental Retardation Center, University of Washington. The work of Diana Hughes and Howard Goldstein in conducting the experiment and devising the coding systems, and the help of Nancy Cook and Carol Stoel-Gammon in preparing this paper, are gratefully acknowledged. Address for correspondence: Psychology Department NI-25, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: studies in the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. MPQ 21. 205–26.Google Scholar
Blank, M., Gessner, M. & Esposito, A. (1979). Language without communication: a case study. JChLang 6. 329–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. (1973) One word at a time. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. MonogrSocResChDevel 41 (1, Serial No. 164).Google Scholar
Campbell, R. & Wales, R. (1970). The study of language acquisition. In Lyons, J. (ed.). New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: an introduction to psycho-linguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J. G & De Villiers, P. A. (1978). Semantics and syntax in the first two years: the output of form and function and the form and function of the input. In Minifie, F. D. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds). Communicative and cognitive abilities – early behavioral assessment. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language development. JPsycholingRes 4. 423–30.Google Scholar
Dore, , (1975). Holophrases, speech acts, and language universals. JChLang 2. 21–40.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and responses in children's speech. JChLang 2. 41–64.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B. & Weintraub, S. (1978). Input language and the acquisition of communicative competence. In Nelson, K. (ed.). Children's language, Vol. I. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. & Smith, P. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974). Stages in the development of one-word utterances. Paper presented at the Stanford Child Language Research Forum, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Snyder, L. S. (1978). Communicative and cognitive abilities and disabilities in the sensorimotor period. MPQ 24. 161–80.Google Scholar
Sugarman, S. (1976). Some organizational aspects of preverbal communication. In Markova, I. (ed.). The social context of language. London: Wiley.Google Scholar