Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-ktfbs Total loading time: 0.272 Render date: 2023-01-28T00:00:58.046Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Learning conversational dependency: Children’s response using un in Japanese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2022

Tomoko TATSUMI*
Affiliation:
Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
Giovanni SALA
Affiliation:
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. Tomoko Tatsumi, 1-2-1 Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, JAPAN. E-mail: tt@port.kobe-u.ac.jp

Abstract

This study investigates how Japanese-speaking children learn interactional dependencies in conversations that determine the use of un, a token typically used as a positive response for yes-no questions, backchannel, and acknowledgement. We hypothesise that children learn to produce un appropriately by recognising different types of cues occurring in the immediately preceding turns. We built a set of generalised linear models on the longitudinal conversation data from seven children aged 1 to 5 years and their caregivers. Our models revealed that children not only increased their un production, but also learned to attend relevant cues in the preceding turns to understand when to respond by producing un. Children increasingly produced un when their interlocutors asked a yes-no question or signalled the continuation of their own speech. These results illustrate how children learn the probabilistic dependency between adjacent turns, and become able to participate in conversational interactions.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239273. doi:10.1017/S030500091400049XGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angles, J., Nagatomi, A., & Nakayama, M. (2000). Japanese responses hai, ee, and un: yes, no, and beyond. Language & Communication, 20(1), 5586. doi:10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00018-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L., & Bara, B. G. (2003). How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics35(2), 207241. doi:10.1017/S0305000915000689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, M., Bobb, S. C., & Clark, E. V. (2016). Turn-taking, timing, and planning in early language acquisitionJournal of Child Language43(6), 13101337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, F. (2017). The LuCiD language researcher’s toolkit [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.lucid.ac.uk/resources/for-researchers/toolkit/ Accessed January 29, 2020.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M. (1987). 11. The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese. In Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (eds.). Language socialization across cultures, 213–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R., & Tao, H. (1996). The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(3), 355387. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(95)00036-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cook, H. M. (1990). The sentence-final particle ne as a tool for cooperation in Japanese conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 1, 2944.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, J. M., & Patterson, C. J. (1977). Plans and the development of listener skillsDevelopmental Psychology, 13(6), 557564. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.13.6.557Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processingStudies in Second Language Acquisition24(2), 143188. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, L. J., & Johnston, J. R. (1988). Acquisition of back channel listener responses to adequate messagesDiscourse Processes11(3), 319335. doi:10.1080/01638538809544706Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. (1997). The Northridge earthquake conversations: The floor structure and the “loop” sequence in Japanese conversationJournal of Pragmatics28(6), 661693. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00070-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamori, M., Kawabata, T., & Shimazu, A. (1998). Discourse markers in spontaneous dialogue. A corpus based study of Japanese and English. In Stede, M., Wanner, L., & Hovy, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of coling/ACL workshop on discourse relations and discourse markers (pp. 93–99).Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Ide, S. (2007). Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 12421254. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushida, S. (2009). Kikite ni yoru katari no shinkou sokushin – keizoku shiji, keizoku saisoku, keizoku shikou- [Recipient’s Methods for Facilitating Progress of Telling: Sustaining, Prompting and Promoting Continuation]. Cognitive studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 16(1), 1223. doi:10.11225/jcss.16.12Google Scholar
Lammertink, I., Casillas, M., Benders, T., Post, B., & Fikkert, P. (2015). Dutch and English toddlers’ use of linguistic cues in predicting upcoming turn transitionsFrontiers in Psychology6(495), 495. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Transcription format and programs (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (2004a). Japanese – Miyata – Aki CorpusTalkBank.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (2004b). Japanese – Miyata – Ryo CorpusTalkBank.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (2004c). Japanese – Miyata – Tai CorpusTalkBank.Google Scholar
Miyata, S., & Nisisawa, H. Y. (2007). The acquisition of Japanese backchanneling behavior: Observing the emergence of aizuchi in a Japanese boyJournal of Pragmatics39(7), 12551274. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.012Google Scholar
Miyata, S., & Nisisawa, H. Y. (2009). Japanese – MiiPro – Asato CorpusTalkBank.Google Scholar
Miyata, S., & Nisisawa, H. Y. (2010). Japanese – MiiPro – Tomito CorpusTalkBank.Google Scholar
Montes, R. G. (1999). The development of discourse markers in Spanish: InterjectionsJournal of Pragmatics31(10), 12891319. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00106-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishizaka, A. (2008). Hatsugen junban nai ni oite bunsan suru bun: sougo koui no shouten to shite no hannou kikai ba [A Sentence Dispersed Within a Turn-at-Talk: Response-Opportunity Places as an Interactional Focus]Japanese Journal of Sociolinguistic Sciences10(2), 8395.Google Scholar
Nisisawa, H. Y., & Miyata, S. (2009). Japanese – MiiPro – Nanami CorpusTalkBank.Google Scholar
Nisisawa, H. Y., & Miyata, S. (2010). Japanese – MiiPro – ArikaM CorpusTalkBank.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Done wrong or said wrong? Young children understand the normative directions of fit of different speech actsCognition113(2), 205212. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005). Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 54(3), 507554.Google Scholar
Sadanobu, T. (2002). ‘Un’ to ‘so’ ni imi wa aru ka [Do ‘un’ and ‘so’ have meanings?]. In Sadanobu, T. (Ed.), ‘Un’ to ‘so’ no gengogaku [Linguistics of ‘un’ and ‘so’] (pp. 75112). Hitujisyobo.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2018). Infant statistical learningAnnual Review of Psychology69, 181203. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011805CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 7193). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, G., & Matthews, D. (2014). The communicative infant. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first langauge acquisition (pp. 1336). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Sidnell, J., & Bergen, C. (2018). Children’s responses to questions in peer interaction: A window into the ontogenesis of interactional competenceJournal of Pragmatics124, 1430. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, L. (2010). Is formality relevant? Japanese tokens hai, ee and un. Pragmatics, 20(2), 191211. doi:10.1075/prag.20.2.04tanGoogle Scholar
Togashi, J. (2002). ‘Un’ to ‘hai’ no kankei o megutte [Regarding the relationship between ‘Un’ and ‘hai’]. In Sadanobu, T. (Ed.), ‘Un’ to ‘so’ no gengogaku [Linguistics of ‘un’ and ‘so’] (pp. 127157). Hitujisyobo.Google Scholar
White, S. (1989). Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and JapaneseLanguage in Society, 18(1), 5976. doi:10.1017/S0047404500013270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Chicago linguistics society, 6th Meeting (pp. 567–578).Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Learning conversational dependency: Children’s response using un in Japanese
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Learning conversational dependency: Children’s response using un in Japanese
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Learning conversational dependency: Children’s response using un in Japanese
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *