Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T07:30:05.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A longitudinal study of the relationship between early language development and play development*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Tamiko Ogura
Tamiko Ogura*
Affiliation:
Shimane University
*
Faculty of Education, Shimane University, Matsue, Japan, 690.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Temporal correspondences between the attainment of specific milestones in play and language were examined through a longitudinal study of four Japanese children (aged 0;7 to 0;11 at the beginning of the study). There were developmental correspondences between the onset of six language landmarks (the emergence of first words, naming words, vocabulary spurts, word-chains, nonproductive two-word utterances, productive two-word utterances) and the onset of subcategories of play. Language and play both reflected the development of underlying symbolic ability, and both developed in a parallel manner at the single-word stage. After the emergence of word-chains, language and play developed interdependently. All the children proceeded through the same sequence of stages, but the rate of development was different depending on their environment.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 273 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Philip Dale, Toru Watamaki and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper. I also thank Yukie Yamashita for her reliability checks. I am grateful to the children, the caretakers, and the parents who made this study possible.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, L., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Snyder, L. Shore & Volterra, V. (1980). Vocal and gestural symbols at 13 months. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 26, 407–23.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. & Most, R. K. (1981). From exploration to play: a cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology 17, 603–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Broughton, J. (1985). The convergence of early cognition and language in the second year of life: problems in conceptualization and measurement. In Barett, M. D. (ed.), Children's single-word speech. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Braine, M. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41, No. 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casby, M. W. & Ruder, K. F. (1983). Symbolic play and early language development in normal and mentally retarded children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 26, 404–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrigan, R. L. (1978). Language development as related to stage of object permanence development. Journal of Child Language 5, 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, J., Franklin, M., Miller, R. & Ramer, A. (1975). Transitional phenomena in early language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 3, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fein, G. (1981). Pretend play in childhood: an Integrative review. Child Development 52, 1095–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenson, L., Kagan, J., Kearsley, R. B. & Zelazo, P. R. (1976). The developmental progression of manipulative play in the first two years. Child Development 47, 232–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Meltozoff, A. N. (1986). Relationship between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage: the specificity hypothesis. Child Development 57, 1040–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, D. & Fujiwara, H. (1981). Gengojiko Jiten. Tokyo: Zenkyoto.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1978). Sensori-motor intelligence and language development. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: the emergence of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B., Lezine, I., Sinclair, H. & Stambak, M. (1972). Les débuts de la function symbolique. Archives de Psychologie 163, 187–243.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. & Dale, P. (1989). Cognitive skills associated with the onset of multiword utterances. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 32, 645–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, M. & Costello, A. J. (1976). Manual for the symbolic play test (Experimental edition). Windsor: NFER.Google Scholar
Morehead, D. & Morehead, A. (1973). From signal to sign: a Piagetian view of thought and language during the first two years of life. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. (eds), Language perspectives, acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
McCune-Nicolich, L. (1977). Beyond sensorimotor intelligence: assessment of symbolic maturity through analysis of pretend play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 23, 89–99.Google Scholar
McCune-Nicolich, L. (1981). Toward symbolic functioning: structure of early pretend games and potential parallels with language. Child Development 52, 785–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune-Nicolich, L. (1986). Play-language relationships: implications for a theory of symbolic development. In Gottfried, A. & Brown, C. C. (eds), Play interactions. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
McCune-Nicolich, L. & Bruskin, C. (1982). Combinatorial competency in symbolic play and language. In Pelper, D. & Rubin, K. (eds), The play of children: current theory and research. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Murata, K. (1968). Yoji no gengo hattatsu. Tokyo: Baifukan.Google Scholar
Ogura, T. (1985). A study of early language development – from proto-language to language. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Shimane University 19, 25–49.Google Scholar
Ogura, T. (1988). A longitudinal study of relationship between early language development and manipulation of objects and play development. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 36, 19–28.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1953). The origin of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rossenblatt, D. (1977). Developmental trends in infant play. In Tijard, B. & Harvey, D. (eds), The biology of play. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Sigman, M. & Ungerer, J. (1984). Cognitive and language skills in autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Developmental Psychology 2, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, J. & Sigman, M. (1987). Categorization skills and receptive language development in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 17, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzgiris, I. C. & Hunt, J. McV. (1975). Assessment in infancy: ordinal scales of psychological development. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: an organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zachry, W. (1978). Ordinality and interdependence of representation and language development in infancy. Child Development 49, 681–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. R. & Kearsley, R. B. (1980). The emergence of functional play in infants: evidence for a major cognitive transition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar