Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-pt62b Total loading time: 0.461 Render date: 2022-01-27T00:08:37.882Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Look before you speak: children's integration of visual information into informative referring expressions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2018

Catherine DAVIES*
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, UK
Helene KREYSA
Affiliation:
Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. School of Languages, Cultures, and Societies, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. E-mail: c.n.davies@leeds.ac.uk

Abstract

Children's ability to refer is underpinned by their developing cognitive skills. Using a production task (n = 57), we examined pre-articulatory visual fixations to contrast objects (e.g., to a large apple when the target was a small one) to investigate how visual scanning drives informativeness across development. Eye-movements reveal that although four-year-olds fixate contrast objects to a similar extent as seven-year-olds and adults, this does not result in explicit referential informativeness. Instead, four-year-olds frequently omit distinguishing information from their referring expressions regardless of the comprehensiveness of their visual scan. In contrast, older children make greater use of information gleaned from their visual inspections, like adults. Thus, we find a barrier not to the incidence of contrast fixations by younger children, but to their use of them in referential informativeness. We recommend that follow-up work investigates whether younger children's immature executive skills prevent them from describing referents in relation to contrast objects.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot-Smith, K., Nurmsoo, E., Croll, R., Ferguson, H., & Forrester, M. (2016). How children aged 2;6 tailor verbal expressions to interlocutor informational needs. Journal of Child Language, 43(6), 1277–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S., Hughes, M., & Skarabela, B. (2015). The role of cognitive accessibility in children's referential choice. In Serratrice, L. & Allen, S. E. (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 123–53) (Trends in Language Acquisition Research, Vol. 15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audacity Team (2014). Audacity(R): free audio editor and recorder [Computer program]. Version 2.0.6, retrieved 12 November 2014 from <http://audacity.sourceforge.net/>..>Google Scholar
Bacso, S. A., & Nilsen, E. S. (2017). What's that you're saying? Children with better executive functioning produce and repair communication more effectively. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(4), 441–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one's age: vocabulary skill and not age is associated with the timecourse of incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Watching the eyes when talking about size: an investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 592609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunger, A., Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A. (2012). The relation between event apprehension and utterance formation in children: evidence from linguistic omissions. Cognition, 122, 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, D., Zubrick, S. R., Lawrence, D., Mitrou, F., & Taylor, C. L. (2014) Risk factors for low receptive vocabulary abilities in the preschool and early school years in the longitudinal study of Australian children. PLoS ONE 9(7), e101476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, C., Andrés-Roqueta, C., & Norbury, C. F. (2016) Referring expressions and structural language abilities in children with Specific Language Impairment: a pragmatic tolerance account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 98113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, C., & Katsos, N. (2010). Over-informative children: production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua (Special Issue on Asymmetries in Child Language), 120(8), 1956–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C., & Kreysa, H. (2017). Looking at a contrast object before speaking boosts referential informativeness, but is not essential. Acta Psychologicam, 178, 8799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C. (2015). The cognitive underpinnings of referential abilities. In Serratrice, L. & Allen, S. (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 263–83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, W., & Pechmann, T. (1982). Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions. Cognition, 11, 159–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickson, W. (1982). Two decades of referential communication research: a review and meta-analysis. In Brainerd, C. J. and Presley, M. (Eds.), Verbal processes in children (pp. 133). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., Styles, B., & Sewell, J. (2009). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale, 3rd ed. (BPVS-III). London: GL Assessment.Google Scholar
Girbau, D. (2001). Children's referential communication failure: the ambiguity and abbreviation of messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(1/2), 81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M., & Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 333–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf, E., & Davies, C. (2014). The production and comprehension of referring expressions. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition: trends in language acquisition research (pp. 161–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M. (2004). Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production. In Henderson, J. & Ferreira, F., (Eds.), The integration of language, vision, and action: eye movements and the visual world (pp. 213–47). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendriks, P. (2016). Cognitive modeling of individual variation in reference production and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00506.Google Scholar
Hendriks, P. (2017) Symposium discussion: processes underlying children's reference production. 14th International Congress for the Study of Child Language (IASCL), University Lyon 2, France, July 2017.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication: competence as a function of age. Child Development, 40, 255–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Butcher, J., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Two- and four-year-olds learn to adapt referring expressions to context: effects of distractors and feedback on referential communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 184210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2007). How toddlers and preschoolers learn to uniquely identify referents for others: a training study. Child Development, 78(6), 1744–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66(2), B25B33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, S. T. (2014). PEBL: the psychology experiment building language (Version 0.14) [Computer experiment programming language]. Retrieved from <http://pebl.sourceforge.net> (last accessed June 2014).+(last+accessed+June+2014).>Google Scholar
Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13(4), 329–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicoladis, E. (2002). The cues that children use in acquiring adjectival phrases and compound nouns: evidence from bilingual children. Brain and Language, 81, 635–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, E. S., & Graham, S. (2009). The relations between children's communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 220–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, E. S., Varghese, A., Xu, Z., & Fecica, A. (2015). Children with stronger executive functioning and fewer ADHD traits produce more effective referential statements. Cognitive Development, 36, 6882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norbury, C. F. (2014). Sources of variation in developmental language disorders: evidence from eye-tracking studies of sentence production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634). doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0393Google ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, D. K. (1996). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests. Child Development, 67, 659–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, D. K., & Happé, F. (2000) Noticing and commenting on what's new: differences and similarities among 22-month-old typically developing children, children with Down syndrome, and children with autism. Developmental Science, 3, 457–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechmann, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27, 89110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved from: <https://www.R-project.org>..>Google Scholar
Rabagliati, H., & Robertson, A. (2017). How do children learn to avoid referential ambiguity? Insights from eyetracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, H. N., Roeper, T., & De Villiers, J. G. (2003). DELV-ST (Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation) Screening Test. San Antonio TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Vanlangendonck, F., Willems, R. M., Menenti, L., & Hagoort, P. (2016). An early influence of common ground during speech planning, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31,6, 741–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varghese, A. L., & Nilsen, E. S. (2013). Incentives improve the clarity of school-age children's referential statements. Cognitive Development, 28, 364–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardlow, L. (2013). Individual differences in speakers’ perspective taking: the roles of executive control and working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 20(4), 766–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardlow, L., & Heyman, G. D. (2016) The roles of feedback and working memory in children's reference production, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 180–93.=CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (2013). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 4th ed. (WPPSI-IV). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J. (1976). Development of communication – changes with age and modeling. Child Development, 47(2), 473–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., & Sonnenschein, S. (1981). The development of informative messages in referential communication: knowing when vs. knowing how. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 127–42). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Look before you speak: children's integration of visual information into informative referring expressions
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Look before you speak: children's integration of visual information into informative referring expressions
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Look before you speak: children's integration of visual information into informative referring expressions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *