Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T00:15:34.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

P. E. Bryant ,
L. Bradley ,
M. Maclean  and
J. Crossland
P. E. Bryant*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
L. Bradley
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
M. Maclean
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
J. Crossland
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
*
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nursery rhymes are an almost universal part of young English-speaking children's lives. We have already established that there are strong links between children's early knowledge of nursery rhymes at 3;3 and their developing phonological skills over the next year and a quarter. Since such skills are known to be related to children's success in learning to read, this result suggests the hypothesis that acquaintance with nursery rhymes might also affect children's reading. We now report longitudinal data from a group of 64 children from the age of 3;4 to 6;3 which support this hypothesis. There is a strong relation between early knowledge of nursery rhymes and success in reading and spelling over the next three years even after differences in social background, I.Q and the children's phonological skills at the start of the project are taken into account. This raises the question of how nursery rhymes have such an effect. Our answer is that knowledge of nursery rhymes enhances children's phonological sensitivity which in turn helps them to learn to read. This paper presents further analyses which support the idea of this path from nursery rhymes to reading. Nursery rhymes are related to the child's subsequent sensitivity to rhyme and phonemes. Moreover the connection between knowledge of nursery rhymes and reading and spelling ability disappears when controls are made for differences in these subsequent phonological skills.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 407 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This research is supported by a research Grant from the Medical Research Council. We are also grateful for the help of Marie Clay, Chris Pratt and Usha Goswami, all of whom read and commented on an earlier version of this paper. We should like to thank Kathryn Rhodes for her part in helping to collect data during the first year of our project. We are very grateful to the teachers and staff of several local Primary and First schools for letting us visit the children in our project at school. The schools are: Bernwood, Botley, Church Cowley, East Oxford, Greycoates, Headington Quarry, Kennington, Larkrise, New Marston, Orchard Meadow, Our Lady's, Pegasus, St Andrews, St Ebbes, St Francis, St John Fisher, St Josephs, St Mary and St John, St Nicholas, St Thomas More, Sandhills, Speedwell, Speenhamland, The Crescent, The Queen's Dyke, Windmill, Wolvercote and Wood Farm.

References

REFERENCES

Bradley, L. (1980). Assessing reading difficulties. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. (1988). Making connections in learning to read and to spell. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature 271. 746–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read – a causal connection. Nature 301. 419–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. I.A.R.L.D. Monographs No. 1. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, P. E. & Bradley, L. (1985). Children's reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E. & Goswami, U. (1987). Phonological awareness and learning to read. In Beech, J. and Colley, A. (eds), Cognitive approaches to reading. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Bruce, D. J. (1964). The analysis of word sounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology 34. 158–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chukovsky, K. (1963). From two to five. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Denckla, M. & Rudel, R. (1976). ‘Rapid automatised naming’: dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia 14. 471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S. M., Cunningham, C. C. & Joyce, P. F. (1981). A study of auditory preferences in non-handicapped infants and infants with Down's syndrome. Child Development 52. 1303–7.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: a developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 42. 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. E. (1988). Rhyming, analogy and children's reading. In Gough, P. B. (ed.), Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Knafle, J. D. (1973). Auditory perception of rhyming in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 16. 482–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knafle, J. D. (1974). Children's discrimination of rhyme. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 17. 367–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenel, J. C. & Cantor, J. H. (1981). Rhyme recognition and phonemic perception in young children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 10. 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18. 201–12.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C. & Fischer, F. W. (1978). Phonetic segmentation and receding in the beginning reader. In Reber, A. S. and Scarborough, D. L. (eds), Toward a psychology of reading. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maclean, M., Bryant, P. E. & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33. 255–82.Google Scholar
Mann, V. (1986). Phonological awareness: the role of reading experience. Cognition 24. 65–92.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Gary, L., Alegria, J. & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition 7. 323–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Gary, L. & Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition 24. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H. & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition 24. 31–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., De Blauw, A. & Van Roosmalen, G. (1979). Talking and playing with babies: the role of ideologies of child-rearing. In Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before speech. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1986). Development of intersubjective motor control in infants. In Wade, M. G. & Whiting, H. T. A. (eds), Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1987). Sharing makes sense. In Steele, R. & Treadgold, T. (eds), Language topics – essays in honour of Michael Halliday. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. & Marwick, H. (1986). Signs of motivation for speech in infants, and the nature of a mother's support for development of language. In Lindblom, B. & Zetterström, R. (eds), Precursors of early speech. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar